|
|
||||||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
1 Endocrinology Service, Department of Medicine2 Human Oncology and Pathogenesis Program3 Department of Pathology, Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center, 1275 York Avenue, Box 296, New York, New York 10021, USA
(Correspondence should be addressed to M Ryder; Email: ryderm{at}mskcc.org)
| Abstract |
|---|
|
|
|---|
10 per 0.28 mm2; WDTC versus PDTC, P=0.03; WDTC versus ATC, P<0.0001; PDTC versus ATC, P<0.002). Increased TAMs in PDTC was associated with capsular invasion (P=0.034), extrathyroidal extension (P=0.009), and decreased cancer-related survival (P=0.009) compared with PDTC with a low density of TAMs. In conclusion, the density of TAMs is increased in advanced thyroid cancers. The presence of a high density of TAMs in PDTC correlates with invasion and decreased cancer-related survival. These results suggest that TAMs may facilitate tumor progression. As novel therapies directed against thyroid tumor cell-specific targets are being tested, the potential role of TAMs as potential modulators of the thyroid cancer behavior will need to be considered.
| Introduction |
|---|
|
|
|---|
| Materials and methods |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Immunohistochemical (IHC) analyses were performed on paraffin-embedded human tissue microarray sections from blocks of well-differentiated thyroid cancers (WDTC; n=33), PDTC (n=37), and anaplastic thyroid cancers (ATC; n=20), and corresponding non-neoplastic and non-thyroiditis thyroid tissues (n=46) from WDTC (n=30) and PDTC (n=15) using two monoclonal antibodies that primarily label tissue macrophages: anti-CD68 KP-1 (pre-diluted according to the manufacturer; Ventana, Tucson, AZ, USA), and anti-CD163 (1:100, Vector, Burlingame, CA, USA). Each tumor was represented by three tissue cores taken from randomly chosen fragments of the tumor (0.6 mm diameter per core). Of the 33 WDTC, 19 were classical papillary thyroid cancer (PTC), 13 were follicular variant PTC (FVPTC), and 1 was a Hürthle cell carcinoma. Of that, 9 out of 19 classical PTC and 0 out of 13 FVPTC had an increased density of TAMs (P=0.004). PDTC were defined as carcinomas showing follicular cell differentiation (at the histological and/or IHC level, i.e., positive for thyroglobulin) with tumor necrosis and/or
5 mitoses per 10 high-power fields (400x). Positive controls included tonsillar tissue and giant cell tumors rich in histiocytes. The negative control consisted of the isotype mouse monoclonal control antibody (clone MOPC-1, Ventana), which showed no specific immunostaining. A single pathologist (R A G), who was blinded to the clinical assessments of each case, scored the immunostains by counting the number of CD68+ TAMs in each of the three tissue cores from each patient's tumor sample (total core surface: 0.28 mm2), and took the mean of three counts. Sections scored with
10 CD68+ TAMs/0.28 mm2 were designated positive for a high density of TAMs and those with <10 CD68+ TAMs/0.28 mm2 were designated as negative.
Genotype
Genotyping for oncogenic BRAFV600E was performed on WDTC and PDTC using 30 micron paraffin-embedded tissue sections. DNA was extracted using the Puregene DNA purification kit for 5–10 mg tissue (Gentra, Qiagen, Valencia, CA, USA). The presence of BRAFV600E was determined by Sequenom analysis (primer and primer extension sequences are available upon request).
Statistical analysis
Clinicopathologic data were recorded for each case in a blinded manner to the IHC staining results and approved by internal review board (IRB) protocol. Statistical analyses were performed using SPSS 14.0 for windows and GraphPad Prism 5.0. Noncontinuous variables were analyzed using Fischer's exact two-sided test and continuous variables were analyzed using unpaired two-sided t-tests. Survival analyses were performed using Kaplan–Meier log-rank tests. Significance was defined as P<0.05.
| Results |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Of the 46 non-neoplastic thyroid tissue specimens, only 2 (4%) were positive for CD68 (mean number of CD68+ macrophages was <5). In tumors, the anti-CD68 antibody showed dense cytoplasmic staining of mononuclear and multinucleated giant-type cells that morphologically resembled macrophages (small bean shaped nuclei with a low nuclear:cytoplasmic ratio). In WDTC and PDTC, positively labeled cells were found within the lumen of the follicles (especially the multinucleated giant cells) and interspersed between the tumor cells. By contrast, in ATC, they were diffusely infiltrated throughout the core sections. The specificity of the stain was verified with anti-CD163 (Fig. 1). Nine out of 33 WDTC (27%), 20 out of 37 PDTC (54%), and 19 out of 20 ATC (95%) were positive for an increased density of CD68+ TAMs (Table 1; WDTC versus PDTC, P=0.030; WDTC versus ATC, P<0.0001; PDTC versus ATC, P=0.002). The mean number of CD68+ TAMs was <5 in WDTC, 9 in PDTC, and 39 in ATC. In the majority of tumor samples from individual patients, there was a consistent number of TAMs between the three cores. Figure 1 shows representative sections of each histological grade at low and high power magnifications.
|
|
As histological grade is an important determinant of tumor behavior and clinical prognosis, it was important to explore the effect of TAMs on tumor progression within a particular histological subtype, rather than comparing the impact of TAMs on clinicopathologic outcomes between grades. Although the number of WDTC with >10 TAMs/0.28 mm2 was comparatively low (9/33; 27%), there was no statistical correlation between the presence of TAMs and extrathyroidal extension (ETE), capsular invasion and vascular invasion. However, the overall abundance of TAMs in the positive cases tended to be lower than that observed in the positive cases in PDTC, but the difference was not statistically significant. None of the patients with WDTC died of their disease (0 out of 33) and few tumors had increased TAMs, whereas 18 out of 20 patients with ATC died of thyroid cancer with a median survival of 3 months (data not shown), and all but one tumor had increased TAMs. Hence, we could not explore the possible role of increased TAMs on the biological behavior and clinical outcomes in these tumor types. By contrast, patients with PDTC had variable clinical outcomes and 54% of these tumors had increased TAMs, making this histotype the most suitable to examine the effects of increased TAMs on clinicopathologic parameters. Overall, patients with PDTC had a median cancer-related survival that ranged from 2.8 to 7.1 years. When stratified according to the presence of increased TAMs, PDTC with a higher density of TAMs were associated with increased capsular invasion (P=0.034), ETE (P=0.009), and decreased cancer-related survival (P=0.009), compared with patients with a low number of TAMs (Table 2 and Fig. 2). The mean cancer-related survival of patients with PDTC and increased CD68+ TAMs was 5.4±0.8 years, compared with 9.7±1.2 years for patients with a low abundance of TAMs (P=0.009). The mean cancer-related survival for patients with ETE was 5.7±0.8 years compared with 11.0±1.2 years for patients without ETE (P=0.005; Fig. 2), consistent with the published data that ETE is a negative prognostic marker in thyroid cancers (Andersen et al. 1995). When the TAM-related survival data was adjusted for ETE, the correlation between increased TAMs and decreased cancer-related survival was lost (data not shown). There were no differences between patients with or without increased CD68+ TAMs in gender, age, stage, or mitotic rate. Patients with increased CD68+ TAMs had a trend toward larger tumors, more extensive tumor necrosis, a higher frequency of distant metastases, and increased flurodeoxyglucose (FDG)-avid positron emission tomography (PET) (+) disease, but these comparisons were not statistically significant (Table 2).
|
|
| Discussion |
|---|
|
|
|---|
The mechanisms by which TAMs are recruited to the tumor microenvironment in thyroid cancer are not known. Expression of oncoproteins involved in thyroid cell transformation may directly stimulate the recruitment of TAMs through increased expression of macrophage chemoattractants. Expression of oncogenic BRAF was found to be particularly potent at inducing their expression as compared with RET/PTC (Mesa et al. 2006), suggesting that cancers with this mutation may be particularly prone to macrophage infiltration. In the present series, neither WDTC nor PDTC with BRAF mutations were preferentially associated with a high density of TAMs, indicating that other TAM recruiting factors are likely at play. However, because there was a low percentage of PDTC with BRAF mutations in this series, the relationship between TAMs and tumor genotype should be viewed as inconclusive in this tumor grade. Regardless of how they are recruited, TAMs secrete a rich repertoire of chemokines and growth factors that may exert paracrine effects on tumor cells to facilitate progression. For example, TAM-derived chemokines may directly enhance tumor cell growth (Mantovani 1994) and may indirectly influence thyroid cancer cell expression of chemokine receptors, such as CXCR4 (Hwang et al. 2003, Castellone et al. 2004), that are important for tumor spread. Secretion of matrix metalloproteases by TAMs can remodel the extracellular matrix, which in turn enables tumor cell mobility, migration, and invasion at both local and distant sites (van Kempen & Coussens 2002). Decreased oxygen tension at necrotic sites may stimulate the recruitment of both phagocytic and angiogenic TAMs to scavenge debris and to stimulate tumor angiogenesis respectively (Lewis et al. 2007). Activation of an angiogenic switch is an absolute requirement for tumor progression, and TAMs have been shown to trigger this process in breast cancer animal models (Folkman et al. 1989, Lin et al. 2006).
The remarkable functional plasticity of TAMs in tumor microenvironments may explain several observations in our study. The correlation between increased TAMs, capsular invasion, ETE and the trend toward distant metastases in PDTC suggests that TAMs are not merely prognostic markers of tumor progression, but may actively participate in the biology of the process. The fact that the density of TAMs and ETE are not independent variables for cause-specific survival suggests that these two events may indeed be functionally related. A study by Fiumara et al. (1997) found no association between the presence of TAMs and ETE, lymph node disease, and distant metastases in WDTC. However, this study was limited to patients with low-grade tumors that are generally associated with favorable outcomes. The presence of both increased TAMs and extensive tumor necrosis in all ATC (data not shown) and the trend toward this association in PDTC suggests that TAMs may also be involved in thyroid cancer angiogenesis. Indeed, Dhar et al. (1998) showed an association between increased TAMs and tumor vascularity in WDTC.
There are presently vigorous efforts by many research groups to develop novel therapies for thyroid cancer, which specifically interfere with signaling pathways activated by mutated oncoproteins. The findings in this paper may impact these efforts in at least two ways. First, if TAMs are important drivers of the biological behavior of advanced tumors, therapies that do not target them may not be effective. Secondly, there is evidence that certain cytokines, such as tumor necrosis factor-
which may be expressed by macrophages, can induce resistance to drugs that target the BRAF–MEK–ERK pathway by inhibiting apoptosis following BRAF inhibition (Gray-Schopfer et al. 2007).
In summary, our results demonstrate that increased TAMs in high-grade thyroid cancers are associated with invasive cancers and decreased cancer-related survival. This study underscores the importance of expanding our understanding of thyroid cancer progression from the one that is narrowly focused on intrinsic oncogenic pathways to investigations that more accurately encompass the whole tumor microenvironment, including tumor-promoting TAMs.
| Declaration of interest |
|---|
|
|
|---|
| Funding |
|---|
| References |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Bolat F 2006 Microvessel density, VEGF expression, and tumor-associated macrophages in breast tumors: correlations with prognostic parameters. Journal of Experimental & Clinical Cancer Research 25 365–372.[Medline]
Castellone MD, Guarino V, De F V, Carlomagno F, Basolo F, Faviana P, Kruhoffer M, Orntoft T, Russell JP, Rothstein JL et al. 2004 Functional expression of the CXCR4 chemokine receptor is induced by RET/PTC oncogenes and is a common event in human papillary thyroid carcinomas. Oncogene 23 5958–5967.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]
Dhar DK, Kubota H, Kotoh T, Tabara H, Watanabe R, Tachibana M, Kohno H & Nagasue N 1998 Tumor vascularity predicts recurrence in differentiated thyroid carcinoma. American Journal of Surgery 176 442–447.[CrossRef][Medline]
Fiumara A, Belfiore A, Russo G, Salomone E, Santonocito GM, Ippolito O, Vigneri R & Gangemi P 1997 In situ evidence of neoplastic cell phagocytosis by macrophages in papillary thyroid cancer. Journal of Clinical Endocrinology and Metabolism 82 1615–1620.
Folkman J, Watson K, Ingber D & Hanahan D 1989 Induction of angiogenesis during the transition from hyperplasia to neoplasia. Nature 339 58–61.[CrossRef][Medline]
Gray-Schopfer VC, Karasarides M, Hayward R & Marais R 2007 Tumor necrosis factor-
blocks apoptosis in melanoma cells when BRAF signaling is inhibited. Cancer Research 67 122–129.
Herrmann G, Schumm-Graeger P-M, Muller C, Atai E, Wenzel B, Fabian T, Henning K, Usadel KH & Huber K 1994 T lymphocytes, CD68-positive cells and vascularization in thyroid carcinomas. Journal of Cancer Research and Clinical Oncology 120 651–656.[CrossRef][Medline]
Hwang JH, Hwang JH, Chung HK, Kim DW, Hwang ES, Suh JM, Kim H, You KH, Kwon OY, Ro HK et al. 2003 CXC chemokine receptor 4 expression and function in human anaplastic thyroid cancer cells. Journal of Clinical Endocrinology and Metabolism 88 408–416.
van Kempen LC & Coussens LM 2002 MMP9 potentiates pulmonary metastasis formation. Cancer Cell 2 251–252.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]
Leek RD, Lewis CE, Whitehouse R, Greenall M, Clarke J & Harris AL 1996 Association of macrophage infiltration with angiogenesis and prognosis in invasive breast carcinoma. Cancer Research 56 4625–4629.
Lewis CE & Pollard JW 2006 Distinct role of macrophages in different tumor microenvironments. Cancer Research 66 605–612.
Lewis CE, De Palma M & Naldini L 2007 Tie2-expressing monocytes and tumor angiogenesis: regulation by hypoxia and angiopoietin-2. Cancer Research 67 8429–8432.
Lin EY, Li JF, Gnatovskiy L, Deng Y, Zhu L, Grzesik DA, Qian H, Xue XN & Pollard JW 2006 Macrophages regulate the angiogenic switch in a mouse model of breast cancer. Cancer Research 66 11238–11246.
Lissbrant IF, Stattin P, Wikstrom P, Damber JE, Egevad L & Bergh A 2000 Tumor associated macrophages in human prostate cancer: relation to clinicopathological variables and survival. International Journal of Oncology 17 445–451.[Medline]
Mantovani A 1994 Tumor-associated macrophages in neoplastic progression: a paradigm for the in vivo function of chemokines. Laboratory Investigation 71 5–16.[Web of Science][Medline]
Mesa C Jr, Mirza M, Mitsutake N, Sartor M, Medvedovic M, Tomlinson C, Knauf JA, Weber GF & Fagin JA 2006 Conditional activation of RET/PTC3 and BRAFV600E in thyroid cells is associated with gene expression profiles that predict a preferential role of BRAF in extracellular matrix remodeling. Cancer Research 66 6521–6529.
Schoppmann SF, Birner P, Stockl J, Kalt R, Ullrich R, Caucig C, Kriehuber E, Nagy K, Alitalo K & Kerjaschki D 2002 Tumor-associated macrophages express lymphatic endothelial growth factors and are related to peritumoral lymphangiogenesis. American Journal of Pathology 161 947–956.
Tsutsui S, Yasuda K, Suzuki K, Tahara K, Higashi H & Era S 2005 Macrophage infiltration and its prognostic implications in breast cancer: the relationship with VEGF expression and microvessel density. Oncology Reports 14 425–431.[Web of Science][Medline]
Yu JL 2003 Host microenvironment in breast cancer development: inflammatory and immune cells in tumour angiogenesis and arteriogenesis. Breast Cancer Research 5 83–88.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
J. C. Ricarte-Filho, M. Ryder, D. A. Chitale, M. Rivera, A. Heguy, M. Ladanyi, M. Janakiraman, D. Solit, J. A. Knauf, R. M. Tuttle, et al. Mutational Profile of Advanced Primary and Metastatic Radioactive Iodine-Refractory Thyroid Cancers Reveals Distinct Pathogenetic Roles for BRAF, PIK3CA, and AKT1 Cancer Res., June 1, 2009; 69(11): 4885 - 4893. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
R. C Smallridge, L. A Marlow, and J. A Copland Anaplastic thyroid cancer: molecular pathogenesis and emerging therapies Endocr. Relat. Cancer, March 1, 2009; 16(1): 17 - 44. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |