|
|
||||||||
REVIEW |
1 Department of Endocrinology and Endocrine Oncology, Theagenion Hospital, Thessaloniki, Greece
2 Department of Pathophysiology, National University of Athens, Athens, Greece
3 Department of Endocrinology, Elena Hospital, Athens, Greece
4 Department of Endocrinology, Barts and the London School of Medicine, St Bartholomews Hospital, Queen Mary University of London, EC1A 7BE London, UK
(Correspondence should be addressed to A B Grossman; Email: a.b.grossman{at}qmul.ac.uk)
| Abstract |
|---|
|
|
|---|
| Introduction |
|---|
|
|
|---|
| Clinical features of malignant chromaffin-cell tumours |
|---|
|
|
|---|
| Biochemical diagnosis of malignant chromaffin-cell tumours |
|---|
|
|
|---|
|
Plasma chromogranin A (CgA), an acid-soluble protein stored and released along with catecholamines, has also been used for the diagnosis and prediction of malignant behaviour in chromaffin-cell tumours (OConnor & Bernstein 1984). The CgA expression is present in both benign and malignant phaeochromocytomas, although different patterns of expression exist in malignant tumours (Portel-Gomes et al. 2001). The CgA is elevated in both functioning and nonfunctioning chromaffin-cell tumours (Guignat et al. 2001), whereas markedly increased levels may be indicative of a malignant tumour in a small series of patients (Rao et al. 2000). Besides its diagnostic significance, the CgA can also be used to monitor response to treatment and/or indicate relapse of the disease (Grossrubatscher et al. 2006). The CgA levels also correlate well with plasma metanephrines and tumour mass (Giovanella et al. 2006). In addition to CgA, region-specific antibodies against epitopes to the C-terminal region of CgB and CgC (secretogranin II), that are co-secreted along with catecholamines from the synaptic vesicles, have also been used for the diagnosis of malignant chromaffin-cell tumours (Portela-Gomes et al. 2004). Secretogranin II and prohormone convertases 1 and 2 were found to be over-expressed in benign when compared with malignant tumours (Guillemot et al. 2006). Neuron-specific enolase has also been advocated as a screening marker since it can be significantly elevated in patients with malignant phaeochromocytomas (Oishi & Sato 1988). Of the several other peptides that can be produced from chromaffin-cell tumours, adrenocorticotrophin over-expression has been related to malignancy (Moreno et al. 1999).
| Anatomical and functional imaging of malignant chromaffin-cell tumours |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Anatomical imaging modalities widely used for the detection of chromaffin-cell tumours include computed tomography (CT), magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) and ultrasound (US). CT can identify primary tumours and metastatic/extra-adrenal lesions above 1 cm in diameter with a 77–98% and 29–92% sensitivity and specificity respectively (Ilias & Pacak 2004); a density of 40–50 Hounsfield units is suggestive of a chromaffin-cell tumour in the relevant clinical and biochemical setting (Sahdev & Reznek 2004, Ilias et al. 2007). MRI has a higher sensitivity (90–100%) and specificity (50–100%) when compared with CT and is superior for the detection of extra-adrenal disease (Ilias & Pacak 2004). Increased signal intensity on T2-weighted images is characteristic, but not diagnostic, for the presence of chromaffin-cell tumours. In large tumours, in particular, signal intensity at T2-weighted images may be low due to haemorrhage and/or necrosis (Ilias & Pacak 2004). Imaging with US is of inherently limited diagnostic yield and should be reserved for pregnant women and children (Ilias & Pacak 2004). However, this technique can be useful for the evaluation of neck paragangliomas (Blake et al. 2004, Ilias & Pacak 2004).
In contrast to other types of tumours, most (chromaffin) cells of phaeochromocytomas express the human norepinephrine transporter (hNET) that is responsible for catecholamine uptake into presynaptic sympathetic neurons (Shulkin et al. 2006). Radiolabelled ligands that are either catecholamines or their analogues are also transported into chromaffin cells via hNET (Shulkin et al. 2006). Functional imaging of chromaffin-cell tumours is performed either using ligands specific for the catecholamine uptake and synthesis/secretion pathway or non-specific ligands (Kaltsas et al. 2005). Specific functional imaging, with 131I- or preferentially 123I-metaiodobenzylguanidine (MIBG) scintigraphy, has been extensively used for the diagnosis and staging of chromaffin-cell tumours (Kaltsas et al. 2001a,b,c, 2004a). Whole body studies can detect the extent of the disease not visible by CT and/or MRI and help identify multiple tumours and/or metastatic sites (Shulkin et al. 2006). 123I-MIBG is superior to 131I-MIBG in terms of physical properties, quality of images and sensitivity (83–100 vs 77–90% respectively); scintigraphy with 123I-MIBG should always include single photon emission computerised tomography (Shapiro 1991, Ilias & Pacak 2004). However, dopamine-secreting tumours do not usually enhance with MIBG and may benefit from specific positron emission tomography (PET) scanning (Dubois & Gray 2005). Non-specific functional imaging with scintigraphy is performed targeting tumour expression of somatostatin receptors type-2 and type-5 with 111In-pentetreotide (Kaltsas et al. 2004a). Although scintigraphy with 111In-pentetreotide is of limited value for non-metastatic, solitary/adrenal phaeochromocytomas (Shulkin et al. 2006), it can reveal extra-adrenal disease (de Herder et al. 2005) and metastases not avid to scintigraphy with MIBG (Tenenbaum et al. 1995, Kaltsas et al. 2001a).
PET imaging using the specific ligands [11C]-hydroxyephedrine (Shulkin et al. 1992) and [11C]-adrenaline (Shulkin et al. 1995) is hampered by the short half-lives of these radioisotopes (Shulkin et al. 2006). However, PET imaging using 6-[18F]-fluorodopamine ([18F]-DA) can detect metastatic phaeochromocytomas at rates higher than 131I-MIBG (Ilias et al. 2003), whereas PET with 6-[18F]-fluoroDOPA ([18F]-DOPA) is superior in imaging extra-adrenal phaeochromocytomas and neck paragangliomas (Hoegerle et al. 2002). Partial intratumoural metabolism of glucose can be used for non-specific functional PET imaging. PET using 2-[18F]-fluoro-2-deoxy-D-glucose (FDG), 18FDG-PET, can identify glucose-avid metastatic lesions (Shulkin et al. 1999), particularly if they are 131I-MIBG or 123I-MIBG negative (Mamede et al. 2006). Although not widely available, PET scanning is an efficient method to detect occult disease; in cases with high clinical suspicion, it can be supplemented with vena cava sampling for plasma metanephrines (Pacak et al. 2001b).
Overall, current imaging modalities exhibit a sensitivity of 90–100% for adrenal phaeochromocytomas and ~90% for extra-adrenal disease, and/or detection of metastases or recurrences (Pacak et al. 2004). Imaging should begin with CT and/or MRI of the adrenals and the abdomen and, depending on the clinical presentation, of the thorax and neck (Pacak et al. 2004, Kaltsas et al. 2005). If extra adrenal/metastatic disease is suspected, and particularly if the anatomical imaging results are negative or equivocal, functional imaging should follow using specific ligands; if the specific functional imaging results are negative, non-specific functional imaging should be used to ascertain the extent of disease (Pacak et al. 2004, Kaltsas et al. 2005).
| Histopathological and molecular markers of malignant chromaffin-cell tumours |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Succinate dehydrogenase (SDH) is a nuclear gene encoding a key mitochondrial enzyme. Specifically, SDH is a four-polypeptide complex (SDH A, B, C and D) located in the inner mitochondrial membrane that catalyses the oxidative dehydrogenation of succinate (Baysal 2006). Hypoxia physiologically induces hypoxia-inducible factor 1 subunit
(HIF1
), a transcription factor that is involved in glycolysis and angiogenesis (which contribute to tumorigenesis; Stoppa-Lyonnet & Lenoir 2005). Inherited or somatic mutations in the SDH genes lead to accumulation of succinate in mitochondria, which in turn inhibits HIF
prolyl hydroxylase, stabilising the HIF1
subunit even in normoxia (Dahia et al. 2005). The NF-1 gene is a tumour suppressor gene located on chromosome 17q11.2; neurofibromin (the NF-1 gene product) bears homology to the RAS/GTPase-activating protein (Koch et al. 2001). The mechanisms via which phaeochromocytoma appears in some patients with NF-1 are not known: biallelic inactivation of NF-1 and loss of neurofibromin expression have been suggested as tentative causes (Bausch et al. 2006).
A number of genomic mutations of the VHL, RET, SDHD and SDHB genes have been identified in sporadic phaeochromocytomas (Neumann et al. 2002b). The European Network for the Study of Adrenal Tumours (ENS@T) Phaeochromocytoma Working Group has recently shown that in about 25% of cases, chromaffin-cell tumours may be inherited (Gimenez-Roqueplo et al. 2006). Therefore, it has been advocated that germline mutation testing should be performed in every patient with a chromaffin-cell tumour as the expression of particular genes could identify patients at increased risk for malignant disease. Malignant chromaffin-cell tumours are rare in patients with VHL syndrome but common in patients with SDHB mutations (Amar et al. 2005, Brouwers et al. 2006a). Patients with familial phaeochromocytomas in the context of MEN 2A, VHL and NF-1 are found to have metastatic/locally invasive tumours in 4, 8 and 12% respectively (Fitzgerald et al. 2006). Malignant and/or extra-adrenal phaeochromocytomas (particularly in the abdomen) are strongly associated with SDHB mutations (Benn et al. 2006, Brouwers et al. 2006a, Gimenez-Roqueplo et al. 2006). In the case of malignant familial chromaffin-cell tumours, it has been suggested that SDHB gene mutation analysis should always be performed (Gimenez-Roqueplo et al. 2006).
As the distinction between malignant and benign phaeochromocytomas is difficult, there is a growing need to identify markers that can reliably predict tumours with malignant behaviour or potential. DNA aneuploidy and tetraploidy have been considered to suggest aggressive behaviour in phaeochromocytoma (Nativ et al. 1992), but can also be found in benign tumours (Kopf et al. 2001). A >6% Ki-67 proliferative index is most commonly found in malignant tumours (Brown et al. 1999, Salmenkivi et al. 2003). Inhibin/activin ß-subunit that is expressed in the normal adrenal medulla has been found to be high in benign phaeochromocytomas and near negative in malignant tumours (Salmenkivi et al. 2001a). Telomerase is a ribonucleoprotein complex including a catalytic subunit (hTERT). hTERT mRNA was expressed in both malignant and benign tumours, but its expression was high in malignant and low in benign tumours (Vezzosi et al. 2006). The heat shock protein (HSP) 90, a component of the telomerase complex, has also been found to be increased in malignant phaeochromocytomas (Boltze et al. 2003). Neuro-peptide Y (NPY) mRNA was expressed in all benign tumours and in only 4 of 11 malignant phaeochromocytomas (Helman et al. 1989), suggesting that lack of NPY mRNA expression may have some prognostic significance. Cyclo-oxygenase (Salmenkivi et al. 2001b) and N-cadherin were also over-expressed in malignant phaeochromocytomas (Khorram-Manesh et al. 2002) as well as genes encoding the vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF), the endothelin receptor type A and type B (Favier et al. 2002). However, these studies do not take into account that changes may appear in these indices during prolonged follow-up period. None of these markers is specific for the disease, and we will probably have to rely on a combination of immunohistochemical and molecular markers for a sound earlier diagnosis.
More recently, higher levels of EM66, produced from the intravesicular proteolysis of chromogranins, were found to be higher in benign when compared with malignant tissue, suggesting that this peptide could represent a marker for disease prognosis (Anouar et al. 2006). The genes that encode the cytoskeleton protein
-tubulin, the granulocyte–macrophage colony-stimulating factor 2 and the interleukin 2 receptor
-subunit were more aberrantly expressed in malignant when compared with benign tumours (Anouar et al. 2006). Using oligonucleotide microarray analysis, 70% of these genes were under-expressed in malignant when compared with benign tumours. Thus, malignant potential in chromaffin-cell tumours is apparently characterised by a less-differentiated pattern of gene expression (Brouwers et al. 2006b). However, these findings need to be validated in clinical practice.
| Treatment of malignant chromaffin-cell tumours |
|---|
|
|
|---|
| Established treatment |
|---|
|
|
|---|
| Surgery of the primary tumour and cytoreductive techniques |
|---|
|
|
|---|
-probe is a valuable tool prior to surgery in order to localise lesions that are not visualised by other imaging techniques (Buhl et al. 2002). In the presence of hepatic metastases, arterial embolisation or chemoembolisation of hepatic metastases has produced transient responses (Kebebew & Duh 1998). Similar results have been obtained with cryoablation and radiofrequency ablation (Pacak et al. 2001c). Multiple hepatic metastases, especially those not amenable to chemotherapy, may benefit from transcatheter arterial embolisation, which should be performed only in specialised centres (Takahashi et al. 1999). | Treatment of malignant chromaffin-cell tumours with radiopharmaceuticals |
|---|
|
|
|---|
The rationale for using radiolabelled MIBG for therapy of phaeochromocytomas and paragangliomas lies in its ability to enter the cell membrane and be stored in cytoplasmic granules via VMA transporters (VMAT 1 and 2; Kaltsas et al. 2003, Ahlman 2006). 131I-MIBG was initially used for the treatment of malignant phaeochromocytoma in 1984, and since then several hundred patients have been treated with different therapeutic protocols using either single or cumulative doses of 131I-MIBG, with a variable total dosage (Sisson et al. 1984, Kaltsas et al. 2003, Kaltsas et al. 2005). Patients are selected on the demonstration of significant radioisotope uptake on diagnostic 123I-MIBG or 131MIBG scans (>1% uptake of the injected dose) with the only limitation of this form of treatment being the total radiation dose to critical organs as the bone marrow (Bomanji et al. 1993, Ahlman 2006). Approximately 60% of metastatic sites are 131I-MIBG avid (Fitzgerald et al. 2006). More recently, quantitative determination of VMAT 1, 2 expression in surgical phaeochromocytoma specimens has been helpful in selecting patients suitable for 131I-MIBG treatment (Kolby et al. 2006; Table 2
).
|
Treatment with 131I-MIBG is not curative in most patients. The impact of treatment depends on the extent of disease at the time of therapy, and therefore 131I-MIBG could be a useful tool to eradicate residual disease shortly after surgery in an adjuvant setting (Mukherjee et al. 2001, Kaltsas et al. 2005). In addition, possible synergistic effects with other forms of therapy need to be addressed (Scholz et al. 2007). In cases with progressive disease after surgery and/or 131I-MIBG treatment, the integration of 131I-MIBG with other therapeutic modalities should be assessed (Shapiro et al. 1995, Kaltsas et al. 2001c). Pre-treatment with131I-MIBG in patients receiving chemotherapy increased toxicity, although the tumour response was greater (Sisson et al. 1999). On the other hand, 123I-MIBG uptake may increase after a radiological response to chemotherapy, enabling successful 131I-MIBG therapy to follow (Hartley et al. 2001). However, no firm recommendations can be made on the basis of experience derived from present retrospective studies including few patients, different protocols, no dosimetric studies and different individual follow-up.
Treatment with radioactive somatostatin analogues
Due to the expression of somatostatin receptor in chromaffin-cell tumours, radiopharmaceuticals based on the somatostatin analogues, octreotide and lanreotide, have been used. Several radiopharmaceuticals with different physical properties have been applied including 111In-pentetreotide/111In-DOTA-octreotide, 90Y-DOTA-octreotide (Shapiro et al. 2001) and 177Lu-DOTA-octreotate, and 111In and 90Y-DOTA-lanreotide (Kaltsas et al. 2005). As in treatment with 131I-MIBG, only patients showing a high tumour uptake to scintigraphy (usually assessed with 111In-pentetreotide) will benefit from this form of treatment. Hormone secretion and tumour growth have been reported to be stabilised in 25% of cases and even decrease in 20% of cases (Eriksson & Oberg 1999). Side effects include mainly leucopenia and thrombocytopenia. Treatment with non-labelled octreotide has not been generally very successful, and only a few patients have showed transient responses (Wiseman & Kvols 1995, Kaltsas et al. 2005). This is because these tumours express somatostatin receptor subtype 2 (SST2), the type of somatostatin receptor with the higher affinity to currently available somatostatin analogues, at lower levels than other neuroendocrine tumours, and therefore the ratio of tumour-to-blood activity is low (Ahlman 2006).
Treatment with combinations of radiopharmaceuticals
Since some patients have MIBG-positive and MIBG-negative lesions, whereas some negative lesions can demonstrate uptake to scintigraphy with 111In-pentetreotide, it is possible that combined treatment using radiolabelled MIBG and a radiolabelled somatostatin analogue might have a synergistic effect (Ahlman 2006). The potentially divergent side effects (bone marrow toxicity for 131I and mainly renal toxicity for 177Lu) could allow the delivery of higher organ limiting doses (Ahlman 2006). Although the combination of 90Y- and 177Lu- has been shown to be more efficacious than either radionuclide alone (de Jong et al. 2002), the relatively low expression of SST2 limits their potential application. The combination of 131I-MIBG and 177Lu-octreotate might be more favourable and with fewer side effects than a single high dose of 131I-MIBG with potential severe bone marrow toxicity (Forssell-Aronsson et al. 2006). It is also possible that the introduction of somatostatin analogues with a wider array of somatostatin receptor affinities, such as pasireotide (SOM230, Novartis), will increase the applicability of this type of therapy.
| Chemotherapy |
|---|
|
|
|---|
-methyl-p-tyrosine to inhibit catecholamine synthesis has been advocated (Wu et al. 1994, Tada et al. 1998). Apart from CVD, treatments with etoposide and cisplatin (Schlumberger et al. 1992), anthracycline plus CVD (Nakane et al. 2003) and cytokine arabinoside (Iwabuchi et al. 1999) have been used with some success. Although individualised chemotherapy has been proven to be useful for palliation and may improve the prognosis of the tumour, more specific chemotherapeutic agents are needed. The over-expression of HSP 90 and hTERT in malignant phaeochromocytomas may be important signalling pathways for these tumours and specific inhibitors such as geldanamycin may prove to be helpful (Park et al. 2003, Sausville et al. 2003). Our own approach has been to use the combination of lomustine (CCNU; 1.-(2-chloroethyl)-3-cyclohexyl-1-nitrosourea) and 5-fluorouracil (or more recently its pro-drug capecitabine) for slowly progressive tumours, and etoposide and a platinum-based drug for those more rapidly progressive. External radiotherapy
Radiotherapy is considered for control of inoperable tumours and palliation of painful osseous metastases. However, during radiation therapy the patient should be closely monitored to avoid acutely exacerbated hypertension and inflammatory signs caused by radiation-induced tumour destruction (Teno et al. 1996).
Novel and evolving therapies
Recently, novel anti-neoplastic therapies have been tried in patients with malignant phaeochromocytomas. A combination of temozolomide and thalidomide achieved a 40% biochemical and a 33% radiological response in patients with malignant chromaffin-cell tumours (Kulke et al. 2006). However, lymphopenia, accompanied by opportunistic infections, occurred in the majority of patients. Novel principles for targeted therapy interfering with signalling pathways may develop following microarray studies, including high expression of angiogenic factors, receptor antibodies and tyrosine kinase inhibitors with anti-VEGF activity (Strock et al. 2006). However, imatinib mesylate did not prove to be effective in a small number of cases (Gross et al. 2006). Following the over-expression of HSP90 in malignant phaeochromocytomas, the new inhibitor of this protein 17-allylamino, 17-demethoxy-geldanamycin may be of additional value (Sausville et al. 2003). The mTOR (mammalian target of rapamycin) inhibitor everolimus (RAD001, Novartis) has been shown to have some efficacy in neuroendocrine tumours generally, although our experience with this drug in two patients with malignant paragangliomas was not very positive. Due to the complexity of the different pathways involved, it is more likely that a combination rather than a single form of treatment may be necessary to obtain adequate control.
Somatostatin-targeted chemotherapy in SST2 and SST5 positive tumours may prove useful and further studies are needed to establish its efficacy (Jenkins et al. 2001). Novel approaches including somatostatin analogues combined with anti-angiogenic factors or gene therapy may also become important tools for the management of these tumours. In addition, the physical characteristics of a variety of radionuclides could affect the response to treatment with radiopharmaceuticals. 131I exhibits very low absorbed values and is not suitable for small tumours.
-emitters, 211At, bound to MIBG (MABG) may be more efficacious for the eradication of residual disease and/or micrometastases (Ahlman 2006). 177Lu-octreotate, which shows considerable activity at short distances, might complement 131I-MIBG for small lesions/micrometastases, and has relatively few side effects due to the different limiting doses. An optimal dose-planning resulting in administration of activities up to tolerance levels for both bone marrow and kidney should allow administration of higher activities and/or more fractions (Ahlman 2006).
Recommendations and conclusions
Malignant chromaffin-cell tumours are rare and their management requires a multidisciplinary approach. Although surgery is almost universally applied, it is rarely curative. Patients with chromaffin-cell tumours with local and/or distant metastases should have scintigraphy with both 123I-MIBG and 111In-pentetreotide to evaluate the possibility of radionuclide therapy which is currently evolving. Tumour biopsies can be used to provide expression of VMAT1-2 and SST1-5, and decide individual dose planning in patients in whom beneficial therapeutic effects are anticipated. Radionuclide therapy can achieve substantial objective tumour responses and eradication of micrometastases. Chemotherapy should be considered for patients without avidity to radionuclide treatment when there is progression of the disease (and/or in combination with other modalities). Cytoreductive techniques are used to alleviate symptoms aiming at reducing tumour load. As there is no currently specific therapy and due to the unfavourable prognosis of the disease, the quality of life of these patients must be an important issue. Experience in dealing with such patients is important and collaboration between physicians in specialised centres will help to determine the optimum therapeutic protocols and to ameliorate the current management. As various investigatory methods and therapeutic options emerge, a consensus on the best strategy should be agreed based upon the evidence from the published series and the experience gained so far (Pacak et al. 2007). We include a suggested algorithm for treatment but would emphasise that these are merely guidelines and there are no fixed rules for investigation and therapy in this difficult area (Fig 1
).
|
| Acknowledgements |
|---|
| References |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Amar L, Bertherat J, Baudin E, Ajzenberg C, Bressac-de Paillerets B, Chabre O, Chamontin B, Delemer B, Giraud S, Murat A et al. 2005 Genetic testing in phaeochromocytoma or functional paraganglioma. Journal of Clinical Oncology 23 8812–8818.
Amar L, Peyrard S, Rossignol P, Zinzindohoue F, Gimenez-Roqueplo AP & Plouin PF 2006 Changes in urinary total metanephrine excretion in recurrent and malignant phaeochromocytomas and secreting paragangliomas. Annals of New York Academy of Sciences 1073 383–391.
Anouar Y, Yon L, Guillemot J, Thouennon E, Barbier L, Gimenez-Roqueplo AP, Bertherat J, Lefebvre H, Klein M, Muresan M et al. 2006 Development of novel tools for the diagnosis and prognosis of phaeochromocytoma using peptide marker immunoassay and gene expression profiling approaches. Annals of New York Academy of Sciences 1073 533–540.
Averbuch SD, Steakley CS, Young RC, Gelmann EP, Goldstein DS, Stull R & Keiser HR 1988 Malignant phaeochromocytoma: effective treatment with a combination of cyclophosphamide, vincristine and dacarbazine. Annals of Internal Medicine 109 267–273.[ISI][Medline]
Baulieu JL, Guilloteau D, Calais G, Lefloch O & Besnard JC 1991 [131I]metaiodobenzylguanidine treatment of a malignant phaeochromocytoma. Journal of Nuclear Biology and Medicine 35 313–314.
Bausch B, Koschker AC, Fassnacht M, Stoevesandt J, Hoffmann MM, Eng C, Allolio B & Neumann HP 2006 Comprehensive mutation scanning of NF1 in apparently sporadic cases of pheochromocytoma. Journal of Clinical Endocrinology and Metabolism 91 3478–3481.
Baysal BE 2006 A phenotypic perspective on mammalian oxygen sensor candidates. Annals of New York Academy of Sciences 1073 221–233.
Benn DE, Richardson AL, Marsh DJ & Robinson BG 2006 Genetic testing in phaeochromocytoma and paraganglioma-associated syndromes. Annals of New York Academy of Sciences 1073 104–111.
Bestagno M, Pizzocaro C, Maira G, Terzi A, Panarotto MB & Guerra P 1991 Results of [131]metaiodobenzylguanidine treatment in malignant phaeochromocytoma. Journal of Nuclear Biology and Medicine 35 277–279.
Blake MA, Kalra MK, Maher MM, Sahani DV, Sweeny AT, Mueller PR, Hann PF & Boland G 2004 Phaeochromocytoma: an imaging chameleon. Radiographics 24 S87–S99.
Boltze C, Mundschenk J, Unger N, Schneider-Stock R, Peters B, Mawrin C, Hoang-Vu C, Roessner A & Lehnert H 2003 Expresssion profile of the telomeric complex discriminates between benign and malignant phaeochromocytoma. Journal of Clinical Endocrinology and Metabolism 88 4280–4286.
Bomanji J, Britton KE, Ur E, Hawkins L, Grossman AB & Besser GM 1993 Treatment of malignant phaeochromocytoma, paraganglioma and carcinoid tumours with 131I-metaiodobenzylguanidine. Nuclear Medicine Communications 14 856–861.[ISI][Medline]
Brauckhoff M, Gimm O & Dralle H 2004 Preoperative and surgical therapy in sporadic and familial phaeochromocytoma. Lehnert H (eds): Phaeochromocytoma, Pathophysiology and clinical management. Frontiers of Hormone Research 31 121–144.[ISI][Medline]
Bravo EL 1994 Evolving concepts in the pathophysiology, diagnosis and treatment of phaeochromocytoma. Endocrine Reviews 15 356–368.[CrossRef][ISI][Medline]
Bravo EL & Tagle R 2003 Phaeochromocytoma: state of the art and future prospects. Endocrine Reviews 24 539–553.
Brouwers FM, Eisenhofer G, Tao JJ, Kant JA, Adams KT, Linehan WM & Pacak K 2006a High frequency of SDHB gerline mutations in patients with malignant catecholamine-producing paragangliomas: implications for genetic testing. Journal of Clinical Endocrinology and Metabolism 91 4505–4509.
Brouwers FM, Elkahloun AG, Munson PJ, Eisenhofer G, Barb J, Lineham WM, Lenders JW, De Krijger R, Manelli M, Udelsman R et al. 2006b Gene Expression Profiling of Benign and Malignant Phaeochromocytoma. Annals of New York Academy of Sciences 1073 541–556.
Brown HM, Komorowski RA, Wilson SD, Demeure MJ & Zhu Y 1999 Predicting metastasis of phaeochromocytomas using DNA flow cytometry and immunohistochemical markers of cell proliferation. Cancer 86 1583–1589.[CrossRef][ISI][Medline]
Buhl T, Mortensen J & Kjaer A 2002 I-123 MIBG imaging and intraoperative localization of metastatic phaeochromocytoma: a case report. Clinical Nuclear Medicine 27 183–185.[CrossRef][ISI][Medline]
Buscombe JR, Cwikla JB, Caplin ME & Hilson AJ 2005 Long-term efficacy of low activity meta-[131I]iodobenzylguanidine therapy in patients with disseminated neuroendocrine tumors depends on initial response. Nuclear Medicine Communications 26 969–976.[CrossRef][ISI][Medline]
Campbell L, Mouratidis B & Sullivan P 1996 Improved detection of disseminated phaeochromocytoma using post therapy 131I-MIBG scanning. Clinical Nuclear Medicine 21 960–963.[CrossRef][ISI][Medline]
Castellani MR, Chiti A, Seregni E & Bombardieri E 2000 Role of 131I-metaiodobenzylguanidine (MIBG) in the treatment of neuroendocrine tumors. Experience of the National Cancer institute of Milan. Quarterly Journal of Nuclear Medicine 44 77–87.[ISI][Medline]
Colombo L, Lomuscio G, Vignati A & Dottorini ME 1991 Preliminary results of [131I]metaiodobenzyluanidine therapy administered in metastatic malignant phaeochromocytoma. Journal of Nuclear Biology and Medicine 35 300–304.
Coutant R, Pein F, Adamsbaum C, Oberlin O, Dubousset J, Guinebretiere JM, Teinturier C & Bougneres PF 1999 Prognosis of children with malignant phaeochromocytoma. Hormone Research 52 145–149.[CrossRef][ISI][Medline]
Dahia PL, Aguiar RC, Tsanaclis AM, Bendit I, Bydlowski SP, Abelin NM & Toledo SP 1995 Molecular and immunohistochemical analysis of p53 in phaeochromocytoma. British Journal of Cancer 72 1211–1213.[ISI][Medline]
Dahia PLM, Ross KN, Wright ME, Hayashida CY, Santagata S, Barontini M, Kung AL, Sanso G, Powers JF, Tischler AS et al. 2005 A HIF1a regulatory loop links hypoxia and mitochondrial signals in pheochromocytomas. PLoS Genetics 1 72–80.[ISI][Medline]
D Herbomez M, Gouze V, Huglo D, Nocaudie M, Pattou F, Proye C, Wemeau JL & Marchandise X 2001 Chromogranin A assay and 131I-MIBG scintigraphy for diagnosis and follow-up of pheocrhomocytoma. Journal of Nuclear Medicine 42 993–997.
Dubois LA & Gray DK 2005 Dopamine-secreting phaeochromocytomas:in search of a syndrome. World Journal of Surgery 29 909–913.[CrossRef][ISI][Medline]
Eisenhofer G, Walther MM, Huynh TT, Li ST, Bornstein SR, Vortmeyer A, Manelli M, Goldstein DS, Linehan WM, Lenders JW et al. 2001 Pheochromocytomas in von Hippel-Lindau syndrome and multiple endocrine neoplasia type 2 display distinct biochemical and clinical phenotypes. Journal of Clinical Endocrinology and Metabolism 86 1999–2008.
Eisenhofer G, Goldstein DS, Kopin IJ & Crout JR 2003 Phaeochromocytoma: rediscovery as a catecholamine-metabolizing tumor. Endocrine Pathology 14 193–211.[CrossRef][ISI][Medline]
Eisenhofer G, Bornstein S, Brouwers F, Cheung NV, Dahia PL, de Krijger RR, Giordano TJ, Greene LA, Goldstein DS, Lehnert H et al. 2004a Malignant phaeochromocytoma:current status and initiatives for future progress. Endocrine-Related Cancer 11 423–436.
Eisenhofer G, Lenders JWM & Pacak K 2004b Biochemical diagnosis of pheochromocytoma. Lehnert H (eds): Phaeochromocytoma, Pathophysiology and clinical management. Frontiers of Hormone Research 31 76–106.[ISI][Medline]
Eisenhofer G, Goldstein DS, Sullivan P, Csako G, Browers FM, Lai EW, Adams KT & Pacak K 2005 Biochemical and clinical manifestations of dopamine-producing paragangliomas: utility of plasma methoxytyramine. Journal of Clinical Endocrinology and Metabolism 90 2068–2075.
Elder EE, Elder G & Larsson C 2005 Phaeochromocytoma and functional paraganglioma syndrome: no longer the 10% tumor. Journal of Surgical Oncology 89 193–201.[CrossRef][ISI][Medline]
Eriksson B & Oberg K 1999 Summing up 15 years of somatostatin analog therapy in neuroendocrine tumors: a future outlook. Annals of Oncology 10 S31–S38.[ISI][Medline]
Mc Ewan AJB 1991 Treatment of patients with malignant phaeochromocytoma with [131I]-metaiodobenzylguanidine. Abstract book of the International Workshop The role of [131I]-metaiodobenzylguanidine in the treatment of neural crest tumors, Rome. Abstract 42.
Favier J, Plouin PF, Corvol P & Gasc JM 2002 Angiogenesis and vascular architecture in phaeochromocytomas: distinctive traits in malignant tumors. American Journal of Pathology 161 1235–1246.
Fernandez-Cruz L, Saenz A, Taura P, Sabater L, Astudillo E & Fontanals J 1998 Helium and carbon dioxide pheumoperitoneum in patients with phaeochromocytoma undergoing laparoscopic adrenalectomy. World Journal of Surgery 22 1250–1255.[CrossRef][ISI][Medline]
Fisher M 1991 Therapy of pheochromocytoma with [131] metaiodobenzylguanidine. Journal of Nuclear Biology and Medicine 35 292–294.
Fitzgerald PA, Goldsby RE, Huberty JP, Price DC, Hawkins RA, Veatch JJ, Dela Cruz F, Jahan TM, Linker CA, Damon L et al. 2006 Malignant phaeochromocytomas and paragangliomas: a phase II study of therapy with high-dose 131I-metaiodobenzylguanidine (131I-MIBG). Annals of New York Academy of Sciences 1073 465–490.
Forssell-Aronsson E, Bernhardt P, Wangberg B, Kolby L, Nilsson O & Ahlmann H 2006 Aspects on radionuclide therapy in malignant phaeochromocytomas. Annals of New York Academy of Sciences 1073 498–504.
Francis IR & Korobkin M 1996 Phaeochromocytoma. Radiologic Clinics of North America 34 1101–1112.[ISI][Medline]
Garaventa A, Gambini C, Villavecchia G, Di Cataldo A, Berolazzi L, Pizzitola MR, De Bernardi B & Haupt R 2003 Second malignancies in children with neuroblastoma after combined treatment with 131I-metaiodoben-zylguanidine. Cancer 97 1332–1338.[CrossRef][ISI][Medline]
Gimenez-Roqueplo AP, Lehnert H, Manelli M, Neumann H, Opocher G, Maher ER, Plouin PF & On behalf of the European Network for the Study of Adrenal Tumours (ENS@T) Pheochromocytoma Working Group 2006 Phaeochromocytoma, new genes and screening strategies. Clinical Endocrinology 65 699–705.[CrossRef][Medline]
Giovanella L, Squin N, Ghelfo A & Ceriani L 2006 Chromogranin A immunoradiometric assay in diagnosis of phaeochromocytoma: comparison with plasma meta-nephrines and 123I-MIBG scan. Quarterly Journal of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging 50 344–347.[ISI]