ERC
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Endocrine-Related Cancer 13 (Supplement_1) S125 -135     DOI: 10.1677/erc.1.01324
Copyright © 2006 by the Society for Endocrinology
This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Powers, M. V
Right arrow Articles by Workman, P.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Powers, M. V
Right arrow Articles by Workman, P.

Targeting of multiple signalling pathways by heat shock protein 90 molecular chaperone inhibitors

Marissa V Powers and Paul Workman

Signal Transduction and Molecular Pharmacology Team, Cancer Research UK Centre for Cancer Therapeutics, Haddow Laboratories, The Institute of Cancer Research, Sutton, Surrey SM2 5NG, UK

(Requests for offprints should be addressed to P Workman; Email: paul.workman{at}icr.ac.uk)

This paper was presented at the 2nd Tenovus/AstraZeneca Workshop, Cardiff (2006). AstraZeneca supported the meeting and the Welsh School of Pharmacy, Cardiff University has supported the publication of these proceedings.


    Abstract
 Top
 Abstract
 HSP90 as a cancer...
 Preclinical studies with 17-AAG
 Clinical evaluation of 17-AAG
 Limitations of 17-AAG and...
 Novel approaches to inhibit...
 Concluding remarks
 References
 
The last decade has seen the molecular chaperone heat shock protein 90 (HSP90) emerge as an exciting target for cancer therapy. This is because HSP90 is involved in maintaining the conformation, stability, activity and cellular localisation of several key oncogenic client proteins. These include, amongst others, ERBB2, C-RAF, CDK4, AKT/PKB, steroid hormone receptors, mutant p53, HIF-1{alpha} , survivin and telomerase hTERT. Therefore, modulation of this single drug target offers the prospect of simultaneously inhibiting all the multiple signalling pathways and biological processes that have been implicated in the development of the malignant phenotype. The chaperone function of HSP90 requires the formation of a multichaperone complex, which is dependent on the hydrolysis of ATP and ADP/ATP exchange. Most current inhibitors of HSP90 act as nucleotide mimetics, which block the intrinsic ATPase activity of this molecular chaperone. The first-in-class inhibitor to enter and complete phase I clinical trials was the geldanamycin analogue, 17-allylamino-17-demethoxygeldanamycin. The results of these trials have demonstrated that HSP90 is a valid drug target. Evidence of clinical activity has been seen in patients with melanoma, breast and prostate cancer. This article provides a personal perspective of the present efforts to increase our understanding of the molecular and cellular consequences of HSP90 inhibition, with examples from work in our own laboratory. We also review the discovery and development of novel small-molecule inhibitors and discuss alternative approaches to inhibit HSP90 activity, both of which offer exciting prospects for the future.


    HSP90 as a cancer drug target
 Top
 Abstract
 HSP90 as a cancer...
 Preclinical studies with 17-AAG
 Clinical evaluation of 17-AAG
 Limitations of 17-AAG and...
 Novel approaches to inhibit...
 Concluding remarks
 References
 
As our understanding of the genetic and molecular biology of cancer has increased, there has been a shift over the last decade in the approaches used in the discovery of novel cancer therapeutics (Workman 2005). In contrast to the earlier development of cytotoxic agents, focus has moved to the development of treatments that target the pathways responsible for malignancy. Validation of this approach has been provided by the clinical activity and approval of small-molecule kinase inhibitors such as imatinib (Gleevec), gefitinib (Iressa) and erlotinib (Tarceva) as well as the therapeutic antibodies trastuzumab (Herceptin), cetuximab (Erbutix) and bevacizumab (Avastin). However, despite the success that these agents have enjoyed, it is likely that modulation of a single molecular target will be insufficient for optimal therapy (Workman 2003). Even where malignancies are driven by single genes or pathways, the development of resistance is a major concern. For example, resistance to imatinib has been shown to arise by acquisition of mutations within the kinase domain of BCR–ABL (Gorre et al. 2001, Shah et al. 2002). Furthermore, the majority of cancers involve multiple molecular abnormalities that are likely to be involved in malignant progression. These observations have reinforced the suggestion that inhibition of multiple targets will be required to cure most human cancers (Workman 2003). It is this concern which provides the foundation for the increasing amount of interest in targeting the heat shock protein 90 (HSP90) molecular chaperone (Workman 2004).

HSP90 exerts its chaperone function to ensure the correct conformation, activity, intracellular localisation and proteolytic turnover of a range of proteins that are involved in cell growth, differentiation and survival (Maloney & Workman 2002, Whitesell & Lindquist 2005). Of particular importance is that HSP90 is essential for the stability and the function of many oncogenic client proteins, which contribute to the hallmark traits of cancer (Fig. 1Go). These include ERBB2, BCR–ABL, AKT/PKB, C-RAF, CDK4, PLK-1, MET, mutant p53, HIF-1{alpha} , steroid hormone receptors (oestrogen and androgen), survivin and telomerase hTERT (Maloney & Workman 2002). Inhibition of HSP90 function has been shown to cause degradation of client proteins via the ubiquitin-proteasome pathway (Connell et al. 2001, Demand et al. 2001), which results in the simultaneous depletion of multiple oncoproteins, the combinatorial down-regulation of signals propagated through numerous oncogenic signalling pathways and modulation of all aspects of the malignant phenotype (Maloney & Workman 2002, Workman 2004). The ability to deliver a combinatorial effect through a single drug target may have promise in treating cancers driven by multiple molecular abnormalities and could also reduce the opportunity for resistance developing (Workman 2004, 2005).


Figure 1
View larger version (60K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]

 
Figure 1 Schematic illustrating how inhibition of HSP90 may interfere with all of the six hallmark traits of cancer. Examples of client proteins involved in the various phenotypic aspects of malignancy are shown.

 
In this paper, we will focus on our interest in developing inhibitors of the HSP90 molecular chaperone family and the progress we have made in understanding the effects of this modulation in both the preclinical and clinical settings. Examples will be taken mainly from the work of our own laboratory.

Presently, five isoforms of HSP90 have been identified, which differ in their cellular localisation. The two major cytoplasmic isoforms are HSP90{alpha} and HSP90ß which share approximately 85% sequence identity at the protein level (Hickey et al. 1989, Gupta 1995). Other major isoforms are Grp94 in the endoplasmic reticulum (Argon & Simen 1999), TRAP1 in the mitochondrial matrix (Felts et al. 2000) and HSP90N, which has been suggested to be associated with cellular transformation via its association with RAF (Grammatikakis et al. 2002). It is currently believed that all the mammalian HSP90 isoforms described above share a similar overall structure, which comprises a C-terminal dimerisation domain, a middle domain that is implicated in client protein binding and also an N-terminal ATPase domain (reviewed in Pearl & Prodromou 2001, Prodromou & Pearl 2003), which is absent in HSP90N (Schweinfest et al. 1998).

The chaperone activity of HSP90 is dependent on its transient N-terminal dimerisation, which stimulates the intrinsic and essential ATPase activity (Prodromou et al. 2000). This process is controlled by an orchestrated set of interactions with a range of accessory proteins referred to as co-chaperones (Pratt et al. 2004, Riggs et al. 2004; Fig. 2Go). Initially, client proteins interact with an HSP70/HSP40/HIP complex. The HSP70 and HSP90 chaperone systems are then linked by the adaptor protein HOP/p60, which interacts with the C-terminals of both HSP90 and HSP70 via its tetracopeptide repeat domain (Scheufler et al. 2000). HOP/p60 can only bind to ADP-bound-HSP90, which has an open conformation and a high affinity for hydrophobic substrates (Pratt et al. 2004).


Figure 2
View larger version (32K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]

 
Figure 2 Model of the HSP90 chaperone cycle for steroid hormone receptor client proteins and the effect of an HSP90 inhibitor.

 
The present model for chaperone activity suggests that when HSP90 exchanges ADP for ATP, it undergoes a conformational change, which includes the transient dimerisation of the N-terminal domains (Prodromou et al. 2000). This leads to the dissociation of HSP70/HSP40/HIP and HOP, allowing the ATP-dependent association of other co-chaperones (e.g. CDC37, p23 or immunophilins) to form the mature complex (reviewed in Whitesell & Lindquist 2005, Sharp & Workman 2006). CDC37 is involved specifically in the loading of kinase clients onto HSP90 (Roe et al. 2004) and p23 has recently been shown to stabilise HSP90 in the ATP-bound form, which extends the time in which HSP90 is in the conformation required for client protein activation (Ali et al. 2006). It is while the HSP90 chaperone cycle is in the mature state that the associated client protein becomes activated to either bind ligand (steroid hormone receptor) or be phosphorylated during signal transduction (AKT/PKB).

Inhibition of ATP binding to HSP90 prevents the formation of the mature complex and results in the proteasome-dependent degradation of associated client proteins. This can occur by the recruitment of the E3-ubiquitin ligase, CHIP, which is a TPR protein that is able to interact with both HSP70 and HSP90 (Connell et al. 2001, Demand et al. 2001). Both of these molecular chaperones may be present in the immature complex, which has been stabilised by the presence of an inhibitor (Fig. 2Go).

At first sight, HSP90 would not appear to be an obvious drug candidate for the design of novel cancer therapeutics. This is because it is not, to our knowledge, subject to mutation or amplification in cancer. It is, however, well-documented as being over-expressed in a range of human malignancies (Maloney & Workman 2002, Sreedhar et al. 2004). This may be a consequence of the hostile conditions created in tumour cells by the effects of deregulated oncogenes and tumour suppressor genes (many of which are HSP90 client proteins), along with the stressful microenvironmental features of solid tumours, which include nutrient deprivation, hypoxia and acidosis (Whitesell et al. 2003, Mosser & Morimoto 2004). Collectively, these factors may lead tumour cells to become highly stressed and much more reliant on HSP90 than cells from normal, non-malignant tissue (Whitesell & Lindquist 2005). This will increase the opportunity for therapeutic selectivity when HSP90 inhibitors are used clinically. This ‘stress hypothesis’ has been explored by Kamal et al.(2003) who demonstrated that HSP90 extracted from tumour cells exists in a high-affinity, activated super-chaperone complex which is approximately 100-fold more sensitive to HSP90 inhibitors when compared with the uncomplexed HSP90 isolated from normal cells (Kamal et al. 2003). In addition to the stressed nature of cancer cells, HSP90 inhibitors could exert therapeutic selectivity by exploiting multiple oncogene addiction and via the preferential dependence of certain oncoproteins on chaperoning by HSP90 (see later).

It is known that the natural product geldanamycin exerts its antitumour effect by binding to the N-terminal ATPase domain of HSP90 to inhibit its chaperone function (Roe et al. 1999). The progress of geldanamycin into the clinic was stopped due to instability and the unacceptable hepatotoxicity seen at therapeutic doses during preclinical in vivo studies (Supko et al. 1995). Further analogues were developed for clinical use, which included 17-AAG (Schnur et al. 1995a,b).


    Preclinical studies with 17-AAG
 Top
 Abstract
 HSP90 as a cancer...
 Preclinical studies with 17-AAG
 Clinical evaluation of 17-AAG
 Limitations of 17-AAG and...
 Novel approaches to inhibit...
 Concluding remarks
 References
 
We have investigated the detailed molecular consequences of exposing cancer cells to 17-AAG in vitro in an attempt to identify genes and proteins that influence the sensitivity to HSP90 inhibitors. In addition, these studies have enabled us to identify and validate biomarkers of HSP90 inhibition, which could be of clinical use (Banerji et al. 2003, Maloney et al. 2003).

It has been well documented that inhibition of HSP90 function induces the expression of HSP72 and degradation of client proteins (reviewed in Workman 2005, Clarke et al. 2006). We have demonstrated the principle of combinatorial inhibition of multiple signal transduction pathways via targeting HSP90 using a panel of human colon cancer cell lines (Hostein et al. 2001). In that study, we showed inhibition of both the RAS–RAF–MEK–ERK1/2 and the PI3K–AKT/PKB pathways following treatment with 17-AAG (Hostein et al. 2001). We showed that this was accompanied by cytostasis, cell-cycle arrest and cell-line-dependent apoptosis (Hostein et al. 2001). The extent of the apoptotic effect was hypothesised to be influenced by the expression of the proapoptotic BCL2 family member, BAX. This was based on the observation that the KM12 colon cancer cell line, which over-expressed BAG-1 and lacked expression of BAX, was unable to undergo apoptosis in response to 17-AAG (Hostein et al. 2001). We and other researchers have subsequently used an isogenic pair of HCT116 cells in which the BAX gene has been removed by homologous recombination (Zhang et al. 2000) to demonstrate that this proapoptotic protein is required for apoptosis to occur in response to 17-AAG treatment (Nimmanapalli et al. 2003). Interestingly, we have demonstrated that in the absence of BAX cell death still occurs but via a necrotic rather than apoptotic mechanism (MV Powers, PA Clarke & P Workman, unpublished observations).

The observed reduction of the RAS–RAF–MEK–ERK1/2 and PI3K–AKT/PKB pathways in the earlier-mentioned study occurs because of the pleiotropic role of HSP90 in modulating the activity of several components of these pathways (see Fig. 3Go). In addition, both of these oncogenic pathways are activated by the receptor tyrosine kinase ERBB2 (Yarden & Sliwkowski 2001, Holbro et al. 2003), which has been shown to be one of the most sensitive and potentially important HSP90 client proteins (Citri et al. 2004). We have examined the effects of ERBB2 overexpression on the cellular sensitivity to HSP90 inhibitors using an isogenic model that we created, in which ERBB2 was overexpressed and functionally active in ERBB2-negative CH1 cells (Smith et al. 2002). Using this approach, we showed that ERBB2 overexpression resulted in a fivefold increase in sensitivity to geldanamycin (Smith et al. 2002). In addition, we have recently demonstrated that in human ovarian cancer cells, which can become resistant to conventional cytotoxics (e.g. paclitaxel) due to increased expression of ERBB2 and/or the PI3K–AKT/PKB pathway, sensitisation to the effects of paclitaxel can be achieved when the taxane is used in combination with non-growth inhibitory concentrations of 17-AAG (Sain et al. 2006). These observations highlight the potential use of 17-AAG both as a single agent and as a potential sensitiser to current chemotherapeutic agents.


Figure 3
View larger version (46K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]

 
Figure 3 Schematic of the PI3K–AKT/PKB and RAS–RAF–MEK–ERK1/2 pathways demonstrating the components which are reliant on HSP90 chaperone function. 90, HSP90; P, phosphate.

 
Consistent with the proposed combinatorial action of HSP90 inhibitors on the hallmarks of cancer, we and other researchers have recently demonstrated the profound effects of 17-AAG and geldanamycin on key aspects of tumour angiogenesis and potentially also of lymphangiogenesis (de Candia et al. 2003, Kaur et al. 2004, Sanderson et al. 2006). Effects included decreased production of VEGF and significantly reduced expression of several members of the VEGF receptor family including VEGFR-1 in human vascular endothelial cells and VEGFR-3 in lymphatic endothelial cells in vitro (Sanderson et al. 2006). These molecular changes were accompanied by reduced endothelial cell migration, tubular differentiation, invasion through Matrigel and secretion of urokinase-type plasminogen activator in human endothelial cells in response to treatment with geldanamycin and its derivatives (Sanderson et al. 2006). Collectively, our results suggest that effects on angiogenesis may play a considerable role in the response to HSP90 inhibitors in vivo.

To further our understanding of the molecular changes associated with HSP90 inhibition, we conducted the first cDNA expression profiling analysis of a human colon cancer cell line panel following 17-AAG treatment (Clarke et al. 2000). We showed that the expression of genes encoding client proteins was not altered at the mRNA level, whereas the expression of genes encoding HSP72, HSC70, keratins 8 and 18 and caveolin 1 was decreased by 17-AAG (Clarke et al. 2000).

The induction of HSP70 family members observed in this study and elsewhere (Hostein et al. 2001, Banerji et al. 2005b, Smith et al. 2005) was of particular interest since this group of molecular chaperones have a well-documented antiapoptotic function (Mosser & Morimoto 2004, Clarke et al. 2006). This generated the hypothesis that induction of these pro-survival genes/proteins may be reducing the apoptotic effect of 17-AAG. Using a short interfering RNA (siRNA) approach, we and other researchers have demonstrated in a range of human cancer cell lines that reducing the expression of HSP72 prior to 17-AAG significantly increases the cell death response to pharmacologically relevant concentrations of 17-AAG (MV Powers, PA Clarke & P Workman, unpublished observations, Gabai et al. 2005, Guo et al. 2005a). In our laboratory, we have also studied the effects of reducing the expression of HSC70 alongside HSP72 in the human HCT116 and ovarian A2780 cell lines prior to treatment with 17-AAG (MV Powers, PA Clarke & P Workman, unpublished observations). Interestingly, under these conditions, the apoptotic response to 17-AAG is dramatically enhanced to an extent far greater than is associated with this predominantly cytostatic agent (MV Powers, PA Clarke & P Workman, unpublished observations).

Along with induction of HSP70 family members, our gene expression profiling studies have also shown a cell-line-dependent modulation of HSP90ß , but not HSP90{alpha} expression levels (Clarke et al. 2000). The direction of this modulation correlated with the cellular sensitivity to 17-AAG. For example, the more sensitive HT29 cells exhibited depletion of HSP90ß , whereas the more resistant HCT116 cells exhibited induction of the drug target (Clarke et al. 2000). HSP90 is itself antiapoptotic and we have, therefore, hypothesised that the alteration of target expression by the drug may be a factor influencing the cellular sensitivity to 17-AAG.

We have gained further understanding of the molecular responses to 17-AAG treatment by using proteomic analysis alongside cDNA microarray profiling in the human ovarian cancer cell line A2780 (A Maloney, PA Clarke, S Naaby-Hansen, R Stein, JO Koopman, A Akpan, A Yang, M Zvelebil, R Cramer, L Stimson, W Ahene, U Banerji, I Judson, S Sharp, J Salmons, M Walton, A Burlingame, M Waterfield & P Workman, unpublished observations). The expected changes described above were shown to be reproducible in this cell line, but at an even greater level of detail than was demonstrated previously. However, a novel and important observation was the altered expression of a group of proteins involved in chromatin regulation, acetylation and methylation in response to 17-AAG (A Maloney et al. unpublished observations). These observations, along with the decrease in total cell acetylation observed during these studies in response to 17-AAG suggest that there is an interaction between protein acetylation and HSP90 function. This is reinforced by other studies, which have suggested that HSP90 function may be inhibited by histone deacetylase inhibitors via a direct increase in acetylation of the chaperone (Yu et al. 2002). In addition, it is well established that there is interplay between HSP90, chromatin regulation and gene transcription in morphological evolution (Whitesell & Lindquist 2005).

Collectively, these examples highlight the power of using an approach that analyses global changes in gene expression following drug treatment to identify factors which may influence the cellular sensitivity/response to treatment and also to discover changes in gene/protein expression that could be used clinically as biomarkers to demonstrate inhibition of the target (see below).


    Clinical evaluation of 17-AAG
 Top
 Abstract
 HSP90 as a cancer...
 Preclinical studies with 17-AAG
 Clinical evaluation of 17-AAG
 Limitations of 17-AAG and...
 Novel approaches to inhibit...
 Concluding remarks
 References
 
Based on the promising preclinical activity of 17-AAG, we carried out one of the initial phase I clinical trials, which provided the first convincing proof-of-concept for HSP90 inhibition in human patients (Banerji et al. 2005a). Molecular biomarkers that we and other researchers selected for use during the clinical trial included the induction of HSP72 and depletion of HSP90 client proteins C-RAF and CDK4 in the tumour tissue and peripheral blood lymphocytes of treated patients (Banerji et al. 2005a, Goetz et al. 2005, Grem et al. 2005). These biomarkers were validated in studies of pharmacodynamic–pharmacokinetic relationships carried out in a human ovarian xenograft model (Banerji et al. 2005b).

We were able to confirm, using pharmacokinetic analysis, that 17-AAG was present at therapeutic plasma concentrations after i.v. infusion (Banerji et al. 2005a). The analysis of molecular biomarkers in tumour biopsies obtained 24 h after exposure to 17-AAG at doses of 320 and 450 mg/m2 per week demonstrated that HSP72 was induced in eight out of nine patients, CDK4 was depleted in eight out of nine patients and C-RAF expression was reduced in four of the six informative patient samples (Banerji et al. 2005a). Encouragingly, we observed prolonged stable disease in two patients with advanced, metastatic malignant melanoma, which led to a phase II clinical trial being initiated at our institution and the Royal Marsden Hospital in collaboration with the Royal Free Hospital, London. In addition to melanoma, evidence of clinical activity has also been reported by others in breast and prostate cancer (Pacey et al. 2006).

To understand the sensitivity of melanoma cells to 17-AAG, mechanistic studies were carried out, in particular to investigate the hypothesis that melanoma responsiveness may be related to the high incidence of B-RAF mutation in this disease (Davies et al. 2002). In collaboration with Professor Richard Marais, we have shown that a number of B-RAF mutants, including the most common V600E form, are HSP90 client proteins which are highly dependent on HSP90 function for stability and activity as compared with wild-type B-RAF (da Rocha Dias et al. 2005). As a result, B-RAF mutants are very sensitive to 17-AAG-mediated proteasomal degradation (da Rocha Dias et al. 2005), which may suggest a possible mechanism for the clinical activity of 17-AAG in melanoma. However, it should be noted that we saw no relationship between B-RAF status and sensitivity in melanoma cell lines. This may be because C-RAF is also a sensitive client protein. Thus, the RAS–RAF–MEK–ERK1/2 pathway will be inhibited by 17-AAG regardless of the mechanism of its activation in melanoma cells (da Rocha Dias et al. 2005). Similar results have been obtained in an independent study (Grbovic et al. 2006).

Overall, our phase I clinical trial demonstrated that it was possible to deliver a dose of 17-AAG, using a once weekly schedule, which achieved potentially therapeutic plasma concentrations, HSP90 target inhibition in tumour tissue and possible antitumour activity (Banerji et al. 2005a). However, the cumbersome formulation of 17-AAG prevented the true evaluation of its maximum tolerated dose. Nevertheless, phase II studies are underway and combination studies are in progress; some of these involve alternative formulations (Pacey et al. 2006).


    Limitations of 17-AAG and future directions for HSP90 inhibitors
 Top
 Abstract
 HSP90 as a cancer...
 Preclinical studies with 17-AAG
 Clinical evaluation of 17-AAG
 Limitations of 17-AAG and...
 Novel approaches to inhibit...
 Concluding remarks
 References
 
17-AAG continues to show promise as the first-in-class HSP90 inhibitor. However, in addition to its poor solubility and cumbersome formulation, this compound does have additional limitations, which have provided a strong case for the development of improved second generation inhibitors. These include relatively weak target potency, reduced activity in the presence of P-glycoprotein (Kelland et al. 1999) and low bioavailability and metabolism by polymorphic cytochrome P450 CYP3A4 (Egorin et al. 1998). In addition, we have shown that the antiproliferative activity of 17-AAG can be increased by overexpression of the polymorphic oxidoreductase enzyme NQO1/DT-diaphorase (Kelland et al. 1999). We proposed that this was due to metabolism to a more active HSP90 inhibitor. Recent studies have confirmed that this increase in potency is indeed due to the metabolism of 17-AAG to the more active hydroquinone form (Guo et al. 2005b). By studying different analogues of 17-AAG, we were able to show that the NQO1 potentiation effect was restricted to alkyl-substituted 17-amino analogues of geldanamycin (Kelland et al. 1999). In the case of 17-DMAG in which the 17-allylamino moiety is replaced by 17-diethylaminoethylamino, the effect of NQO1/DT-diaphorase was determined to be dramatically reduced using an NQO1± isogenic pair that we developed (Sharp et al. 2000). Analogues that lack the NQO1 effect may have the advantage over 17-AAG of reducing the risk of resistance developing. However, there is a concern that the lack of NQO1 effect on 17-DMAG may also reduce the potential therapeutic advantage in high NQO1-expressing cancers. In addition to metabolism by NQO1, as mentioned earlier, 17-AAG also undergoes extensive metabolism in vivo by cytochrome P450 CYP3A4 to the 17-amino compound, which becomes insensitive to the effects of NQO1/DT-diaphorase (Kelland et al. 1999), suggesting that the conversion of 17-AAG to the dihydroquinone form may not be a critical factor for activity in vivo. On the other hand, metabolism by polymorphic CYP3A4 and NQO1 is likely to be a cause of variability in pharmacokinetics.

The analogue 17-DMAG is more water soluble than 17-AAG, but exhibits equal or greater activity (Hollingshead et al. 2005). Therefore, it may be possible to circumvent the solubility and formulation issues seen with 17-AAG. Clinical trials by ourselves and other researchers have been initiated using this novel derivative (Hollingshead et al. 2005). In addition, the hydroquinone form of 17-AAG, IPI-504 is very water soluble and has now entered clinical evaluation (Infinity Pharmaceuticals; http://www.ipi.com).

The wide array of HSP90 inhibitors currently in the preclinical pipeline has been reviewed extensively elsewhere (Chiosis et al. 2006, Pacey et al. 2006, Sharp & Workman 2006). The first generation of synthetic small-molecule HSP90 inhibitors were purine analogues (Chiosis et al. 2002) that were designed to mimic the unusual ‘C-shape’ adopted by ADP/ATP when bound to the N-terminal domain of HSP90 (Prodromou et al. 1997, Stebbins et al. 1997). In collaborative studies with Vernalis, the X-ray co-crystal structure of human HSP90{alpha} and HSP90ß complexed with a lead purine inhibitor PU3 was determined (Wright et al. 2004). Unexpectedly, we showed that although the purine does indeed mimic ATP/ADP, it also induces a conformational change in the loop region, which caps the ATP-binding site, to create a new binding domain (Wright et al. 2004). From this, more potent analogues were designed, which demonstrated at least 50 times more activity than PU3 (Wright et al. 2004).

Our progress in developing novel HSP90 inhibitors was furthered by a high-throughput screen of our (then) 53 000 compound library using a malachite green assay to measure the ATPase activity of the full-length recombinant yeast HSP90 (Aherne et al. 2003, Rowlands et al. 2004). Using this screen, we identified the diaryl pyrazole resorcinol series of HSP90 inhibitors exemplified by the initial micromolar hit CCT018159 (Cheung et al. 2005). Yeast HSP90 was used in the initial screen due to its high ATPase activity; however, the compounds were confirmed as active against human HSP90 activated by AHA1 (see later). In collaboration with Professor Laurence Pearl’s laboratory, X-ray co-crystal structures were obtained for CCT018159 and related analogues and structure–activity relationship studies quickly identified optimisation opportunities (Cheung et al. 2005). As part of a productive collaboration with Vernalis, structure-guided introduction of the 5-amide substitution increased hydrogen bond interaction with Gly-97 of human HSP90 and led to the generation of the more potent analogues. This is exemplified by VER49009 (CCT129397), which compares favourably with 17-AAG, has nanomolar activity and has the required potency and potential to become a clinical candidate (Dymock et al. 2005).

We have shown that the 3,4 diaryl pyrazole CCT018159 described above was able to inhibit human HSP90ß with a similar potency to 17-AAG and with a very high degree of selectivity towards HSP90 compared with topoisomerase II, HSP72 and a representative panel of kinases (SY Sharp, K Boxall, M Rowlands, C Prodromou, SM Roe, A Maloney, M Powers, PA Clarke, G Box, S Sanderson, L Patterson, TP Matthews, KMJ Cheung, K Ball, A Hayes, F Raynaud, R Morais, L Pearl, S Eccles, W Aherne, E McDonald & P Workman, unpublished observations). Unlike 17-AAG, we have also demonstrated that the cellular sensitivity to CCT018159 was not affected by NQO1/DT-diaphorase or P-glycoprotein (SY Sharp et al. unpublished observations). We have demonstrated that CCT018159 inhibits a range of different cancer cell lines in vitro at micromolar concentrations, which caused degradation of client proteins and induction of HSP72. This molecular biomarker signature of HSP90 inhibition was accompanied by cell cytostasis, G1 cell-cycle arrest and apoptosis (SY Sharp et al. unpublished observations). In agreement with our earlier studies using geldanamycin and its derivatives, CCT018159 was observed to reduce tumour cell invasion and exhibit antiangiogenic activity (Sharp et al. unpublished observations). It was concluded from these studies that the diaryl pyrazole resorcinol series of novel HSP90 inhibitors have similar cellular properties to 17-AAG, but have several possible advantages (e.g. aqueous solubility, independence from NQO1 and P-glycoprotein), which may provide the basis for the future development of clinically superior HSP90 modulators.

These studies demonstrate that high-throughput screening combined with X-ray crystallography and structure-based design can provide a powerful approach for the discovery of HSP90 ATPase inhibitors.


    Novel approaches to inhibit the HSP90 molecular chaperone
 Top
 Abstract
 HSP90 as a cancer...
 Preclinical studies with 17-AAG
 Clinical evaluation of 17-AAG
 Limitations of 17-AAG and...
 Novel approaches to inhibit...
 Concluding remarks
 References
 
The results from our laboratory and others discussed so far have focused on the effect of inhibiting the ATPase activity of HSP90 activity directly. However, as described earlier, HSP90 functions in a multi-protein complex comprised of client proteins and co-chaperones. One of these co-chaperones, AHA1 (activator of HSP90 ATPase) (Panaretou et al. 2002) was identified as being a stress-regulated protein, which activates the essential, intrinsic ATPase of HSP90 (Panaretou et al. 2002). During the above-mentioned cDNA microarray and proteomic studies, we were able to identify that AHA1 was induced at both the mRNA and protein levels by 17-AAG in human cancer cells (Panaretou et al. 2002). We have since used an siRNA approach to specifically reduce the expression of AHA1 prior to treatment with 17-AAG. This has been shown to increase the sensitivity of human cancer cell lines to 17-AAG in vitro (JL Holmes, SY Sharp, S Hobbs & P Workman, unpublished observations). In addition, we have demonstrated that reducing the expression of AHA1 can directly affect the activity of HSP90, as demonstrated by reduced signalling via the RAS–RAF–MEK–ERK1/2 and PI3K–AKT/PKB pathways (JL Holmes, SY Sharp, S Hobbs & P Workman, unpublished observations). These data have led us to propose that AHA1 may be an interesting drug target with potential inhibitors being used either alone or alongside existing HSP90 modulators to improve their therapeutic efficacy.

As discussed earlier, induction of HSP70 isoforms has been shown by our laboratory and others to occur in response to 17-AAG both in vitro and in vivo (Hostein et al. 2001, Banerji et al. 2005b, Smith et al. 2005). HSP70 has been well documented as a co-chaperone involved in substrate-loading onto HSP90 (Whitesell & Lindquist 2005, Sharp & Workman 2006). We have pursued this using siRNA to simultaneously reduce the expression of the two major isoforms of the HSP70 family, HSP72 and HSC70. We have shown that this reduces the activity of HSP90, as determined by decreased expression of C-RAF, CDK4 and ERBB2 in human colon and ovarian cell lines (MV Powers, PA Clarke & P Workman, unpublished observations). This was accompanied by inhibition of cell growth and induction of cell death, the extent of which was far greater than is observed with 17-AAG.

AHA1 and HSP70 isoforms are just two examples of the array of co-chaperones that have been shown to interact with and modulate the activity of HSP90. We are currently investigating whether targeting other co-chaperones including p50/CDC37, p23 and CHIP could have benefits as therapeutic targets in their own right or could be modulated alongside the use of existing HSP90 inhibitors.


    Concluding remarks
 Top
 Abstract
 HSP90 as a cancer...
 Preclinical studies with 17-AAG
 Clinical evaluation of 17-AAG
 Limitations of 17-AAG and...
 Novel approaches to inhibit...
 Concluding remarks
 References
 
HSP90 is an exciting new therapeutic target, inhibition of which delivers a combinatorial attack on multiple oncogenic targets and pathways and on all of the hallmark traits of malignancy. The development of HSP90 inhibitors has moved forward rapidly alongside our growing understanding of the role of the chaperone in normal and malignant cells. The first and second generations of HSP90 inhibitors act by blocking its intrinsic ATPase activity. Following on from the natural product-based agents, exemplified by 17-AAG and related analogues that have entered clinical trials, a variety of HSP90-inhibitory chemo-types are now under development. It is also possible that new classes of inhibitor could be developed which act upon the co-chaperones of HSP90.

Clinical activity has been seen with 17-AAG in melanoma, breast and prostate cancer. Although a strength of HSP90 inhibitors is their combinatorial action in depleting multiple client proteins, this can, at the same time, obscure the precise mechanism of action that may predominate in a particular cancer. Clearly, there is potential for activity in endocrine-related cancers through effects on steroid hormone receptors, receptor tyrosine kinases and downstream signalling proteins, including members of both the RAS–RAF–MEK–ERK1/2 and PI3K–AKT-mTOR pathways. Action on these and other client proteins, such as mutant B-RAF, provides the potential for activity in a wide range of cancers.


    Acknowledgements
 
Work in the authors’ laboratory (www.icr.ac.uk/) is funded by Cancer Research UK Programme Grant Number [CUK] C309/A2187. Some of the work discussed in this article was also funded in part by Vernalis. Paul Workman is a Cancer Research UK Life Fellow. We thank our many colleagues and collaborators for their valuable discussions. The authors have been involved in a research collaboration with Vernalis to develop inhibitors and these have been licensed to Novartis. P Workman is a consultant to Novartis.


    References
 Top
 Abstract
 HSP90 as a cancer...
 Preclinical studies with 17-AAG
 Clinical evaluation of 17-AAG
 Limitations of 17-AAG and...
 Novel approaches to inhibit...
 Concluding remarks
 References
 
Aherne W, Maloney A, Prodromou C, Rowlands MG, Hardcastle A, Boxall K, Clarke P, Walton MI, Pearl L & Workman P 2003 Assays for HSP90 and inhibitors. Methods in Molecular Medicine 85 149–161.[Medline]

Ali MM, Roe SM, Vaughan CK, Meyer P, Panaretou B, Piper PW, Prodromou C & Pearl LH 2006 Crystal structure of an Hsp90-nucleotide-p23/Sba1 closed chaperone complex. Nature 440 1013–1017.[CrossRef][Medline]

Argon Y & Simen BB 1999 GRP94, an ER chaperone with protein and peptide binding properties. Seminars in Cell and Developmental Biology 10 495–505.

Banerji U, Judson I & Workman P 2003 The clinical applications of heat shock protein inhibitors in cancer -present and future. Current Cancer Drug Targets 3 385–390.[CrossRef][Medline]

Banerji U, O’Donnell A, Scurr M, Pacey S, Stapleton S, Asad Y, Simmons L, Maloney A, Raynaud F, Campbell M et al. 2005a Phase I pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic study of 17-allylamino, 17-demethoxygeldanamycin in patients with advanced malignancies. Journal of Clinical Oncology 23 4152–4161.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Banerji U, Walton M, Raynaud F, Grimshaw R, Kelland L, Valenti M, Judson I & Workman P 2005b Pharmacokinetic-pharmacodynamic relationships for the heat shock protein 90 molecular chaperone inhibitor 17-allylamino, 17-demethoxygeldanamycin in human ovarian cancer xenograft models. Clinical Cancer Research 11 7023–7032.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Cheung KM, Matthews TP, James K,Rowlands MG,Boxall KJ, Sharp SY, Maloney A, Roe SM, Prodromou C, Pearl LH et al. 2005 The identification, synthesis, protein crystal structure and in vitro biochemical evaluation of a new 3,4-diarylpyrazole class of Hsp90 inhibitors. Bioorganic and Medicinal Chemistry Letters 15 3338–3343.

Chiosis G, Lucas B, Shtil A, Huezo H & Rosen N 2002 Development of a purine-scaffold novel class of Hsp90 binders that inhibit the proliferation of cancer cells and induce the degradation of Her2 tyrosine kinase. Bioorganic and Medicinal Chemistry 10 3555–3564.[CrossRef][Medline]

Chiosis G, Caldas LE & Solit D 2006 Heat shock protein-90 inhibitors: a chronicle from geldanamycin to today’s agents. Current Opinion in Investigational Drugs 7 534–541.

Citri A, Kochupurakkal BS & Yarden Y 2004 The achilles heel of ErbB-2/HER2: regulation by the Hsp90 chaperone machine and potential for pharmacological intervention. Cell Cycle 3 51–60.[Web of Science][Medline]

Clarke PA, Hostein I, Banerji U, Stefano FD, Maloney A, Walton M, Judson I & Workman P 2000 Gene expression profiling of human colon cancer cells following inhibition of signal transduction by 17-allylamino-17-demethoxy-geldanamycin, an inhibitor of the hsp90 molecular chaperone. Oncogene 19 4125–4133.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]

Clarke PA, Powers M & Workman P 2006 Inhibition of the molecular chaperone heat shock protein 90 in cancer: consequences for the regulation of survival signalling and induction of cell death. In Apoptosis and Cancer Therapy, edn 1, pp 933–959. Eds K-M Debatin & S Fulda, Weinheim Wiley-VCH.

Connell P, Ballinger CA, Jiang J, Wu Y, Thompson LJ, Hohfeld J & Patterson C 2001 The co-chaperone CHIP regulates protein triage decisions mediated by heat-shock proteins. Nature Cell Biology 3 93–96.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]

da Rocha Dias S, Friedlos F, Light Y, Springer C, Workman P & Marais R 2005 Activated B-RAF is an Hsp90 client protein that is targeted by the anticancer drug 17-allylamino-17-demethoxygeldanamycin. Cancer Research 65 10686–10691.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Davies H, Bignell GR, Cox C, Stephens P, Edkins S, Clegg S, Teague J, Woffendin H, Garnett MJ, Bottomley W et al. 2002 Mutations of the BRAF gene in human cancer. Nature 417 949–954.[CrossRef][Medline]

de Candia P, Solit DB, Giri D, Brogi E, Siegel PM, Olshen AB, Muller WJ, Rosen N & Benezra R 2003 Angiogenesis impairment in Id-deficient mice cooperates with an Hsp90 inhibitor to completely suppress HER2/neu-dependent breast tumors. PNAS 100 12337–12342.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Demand J, Alberti S, Patterson C & Hohfeld J 2001 Cooperation of a ubiquitin domain protein and an E3 ubiquitin ligase during chaperone/proteasome coupling. Current Biology 11 1569–1577.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]

Dymock BW, Barril X, Brough PA, Cansfield JE, Massey A, McDonald E, Hubbard RE, Surgenor A, Roughley SD, Webb P et al. 2005 Novel, potent small-molecule inhibitors of the molecular chaperone Hsp90 discovered through structure-based design. Journal of Medicinal Chemistry 48 4212–4215.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]

Egorin MJ, Rosen DM, Wolff JH, Callery PS, Musser SM & Eiseman JL 1998 Metabolism of 17-(allylamino)-17-demethoxygeldanamycin (NSC 330507) by murine and human hepatic preparations. Cancer Research 58 2385–2396.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Felts SJ, Owen BA, Nguyen P, Trepel J, Donner DB & Toft DO 2000 The hsp90-related protein TRAP1 is a mitochondrial protein with distinct functional properties. Journal of Biological Chemistry 275 3305–3312.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Gabai VL, Budagova KR & Sherman MY 2005 Increased expression of the major heat shock protein Hsp72 in human prostate carcinoma cells is dispensable for their viability but confers resistance to a variety of anticancer agents. Oncogene 24 3328–3338.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]

Goetz MP, Toft D, Reid J, Ames M, Stensgard B, Safgren S, Adjei AA, Sloan J, Atherton P, Vasile V et al. 2005 Phase I trial of 17-allylamino-17-demethoxygeldanamycin in patients with advanced cancer. Journal of Clinical Oncology 23 1078–1087.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Gorre ME, Mohammed M, Ellwood K, Hsu N, Paquette R, Rao PN & Sawyers CL 2001 Clinical resistance to STI-571 cancer therapy caused by BCR-ABL gene mutation or amplification. Science 293 876–880.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Grammatikakis N, Vultur A, Ramana CV, Siganou A, Schweinfest CW, Watson DK & Raptis L 2002 The role of Hsp90N, a new member of the Hsp90 family, in signal transduction and neoplastic transformation. Journal of Biological Chemistry 277 8312–8320.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Grbovic OM, Basso AD, Sawai A, Ye Q, Friedlander P, Solit D & Rosen N 2006 V600E B-Raf requires the Hsp90 chaperone for stability and is degraded in response to Hsp90 inhibitors. PNAS 103 57–62.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Grem JL, Morrison G, Guo XD, Agnew E, Takimoto CH, Thomas R, Szabo E, Grochow L, Grollman F, Hamilton JM et al. 2005 Phase I and pharmacologic study of 17-(allylamino)-17-demethoxygeldanamycin in adult patients with solid tumors. Journal of Clinical Oncology 23 1885–1893.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Guo F, Rocha K, Bali P, Pranpat M, Fiskus W, Boyapalle S, Kumaraswamy S, Balasis M, Greedy B, Armitage ES et al. 2005a Abrogation of heat shock protein 70 induction as a strategy to increase antileukemia activity of heat shock protein 90 inhibitor 17-allylamino-demethoxy geldanamycin. Cancer Research 65 10536–10544.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Guo W, Reigan P, Siegel D, Zirrolli J, Gustafson D & Ross D 2005b Formation of 17-allylamino-demethoxygeldanamycin (17-AAG) hydroquinone by NAD(P)H:quinone oxidoreductase 1: role of 17-AAG hydroquinone in heat shock protein 90 inhibition. Cancer Research 65 10006–10015.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Gupta RS 1995 Phylogenetic analysis of the 90 kD heat shock family of protein sequences and an examination of the relationship among animals, plants, and fungi species. Molecular Biology and Evolution 12 1063–1073.[Abstract]

Hickey E, Brandon SE, Smale G, Lloyd D & Weber LA 1989 Sequence and regulation of a gene encoding a human 89-kilodalton heat shock protein. Molecular and Cellular Biology 9 2615–2626.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Holbro T, Civenni G & Hynes NE 2003 The ErbB receptors and their role in cancer progression. Experimental Cell Research 284 99–110.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]

Hollingshead M, Alley M, Burger AM, Borgel S, Pacula-Cox C, Fiebig HH & Sausville EA 2005 In vivo antitumor efficacy of 17-DMAG (17-dimethylaminoethylamino-17-demethoxygeldanamycin hydrochloride), a water-soluble geldanamycin derivative. Cancer Chemotherapy and Pharmacology 56 115–125.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]

Hostein I, Robertson D, DiStefano F, Workman P & Clarke PA 2001 Inhibition of signal transduction by the Hsp90 inhibitor 17-allylamino-17-demethoxygeldanamycin results in cytostasis and apoptosis. Cancer Research 61 4003–4009.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Kamal A, Thao L, Sensintaffar J, Zhang L, Boehm MF, Fritz LC & Burrows FJ 2003 A high-affinity conformation of Hsp90 confers tumour selectivity on Hsp90 inhibitors. Nature 425 407–410.[CrossRef][Medline]

Kaur G, Belotti D, Burger AM, Fisher-Nielson K, Borsotti P, Riccardi E, Thillainathan J, Hollingshead M, Sausville EA & Giavazzi R 2004 Antiangiogenic properties of 17-(dimethylaminoethylamino)-17-demethoxygeldanamycin: an orally bioavailable heat shock protein 90 modulator. Clinical Cancer Research 10 4813–4821.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Kelland LR, Sharp SY, Rogers PM, Myers TG & Workman P 1999 DT-Diaphorase expression and tumor cell sensitivity to 17-allylamino, 17-demethoxygeldanamycin, an inhibitor of heat shock protein 90. Journal of the National Cancer Institute 91 1940–1949.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Maloney A & Workman P 2002 HSP90 as a new therapeutic target for cancer therapy: the story unfolds. Expert Opinion on Biological Therapy 2 3–24.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]

Maloney A, Clarke PA & Workman P 2003 Genes and proteins governing the cellular sensitivity to HSP90 inhibitors: a mechanistic perspective. Current Cancer Drug Targets 3 331–341.[CrossRef][Medline]

Mosser DD & Morimoto RI 2004 Molecular chaperones and the stress of oncogenesis. Oncogene 23 2907–2918.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]

Nimmanapalli R, O’Bryan E, Kuhn D, Yamaguchi H, Wang HG & Bhalla KN 2003 Regulation of 17-AAG–induced apoptosis: role of Bcl-2, Bcl-xL, and Bax downstream of 17-AAG–mediated down-regulation of Akt, Raf-1, and Src kinases. Blood 102 269–275.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Pacey S, Banerji U, Judson I & Workman P 2006 Hsp90 inhibitors in the clinic. Handbook of Experimental Pharmacology 172 331–358.[Medline]

Panaretou B, Siligardi G, Meyer P, Maloney A, Sullivan JK, Singh S, Millson SH, Clarke PA, Naaby-Hansen S, Stein R et al. 2002 Activation of the ATPase activity of hsp90 by the stress-regulated co-chaperone aha1. Molecular Cell 10 1307–1318.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]

Pearl LH & Prodromou C 2001 Structure, function, and mechanism of the Hsp90 molecular chaperone. Advances in Protein Chemistry 59 157–186.[Web of Science][Medline]

Pratt WB, Galigniana MD, Harrell JM & DeFranco DB 2004 Role of hsp90 and the hsp90-binding immunophilins in signalling protein movement. Cellular Signalling 16 857–872.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]

Prodromou C & Pearl LH 2003 Structure and functional relationships of Hsp90. Current Cancer Drug Targets 3 301–323.[CrossRef][Medline]

Prodromou C, Roe SM, O’Brien R, Ladbury JE, Piper PW & Pearl LH 1997 Identification and structural characterization of the ATP/ADP-binding site in the Hsp90 molecular chaperone. Cell 90 65–75.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]

Prodromou C, Panaretou B, Chohan S, Siligardi G, O’Brien R, Ladbury JE, Roe SM, Piper PW & Pearl LH 2000 The ATPase cycle of Hsp90 drives a molecular ‘clamp’ via transient dimerization of the N-terminal domains. EMBO Journal 19 4383–4392.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]

Riggs D, Cox M, Cheung-Flynn J, Prapapanich V, Carrigan P & Smith D 2004 Functional specificity of co-chaperone interactions with Hsp90 client proteins. Critical Reviews in Biochemistry and Molecular Biology 39 279–295.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]

Roe SM, Prodromou C, O’Brien R, Ladbury JE, Piper PW & Pearl LH 1999 Structural basis for inhibition of the Hsp90 molecular chaperone by the antitumor antibiotics radici-col and geldanamycin. Journal of Medicinal Chemistry 42 260–266.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]

Roe SM, Ali MM, Meyer P, Vaughan CK, Panaretou B, Piper PW, Prodromou C & Pearl LH 2004 The mechanism of Hsp90 regulation by the protein kinase-specific cochaperone p50(cdc37). Cell 116 87–98.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]

Rowlands MG, Newbatt YM, Prodromou C, Pearl LH, Workman P & Aherne W 2004 High-throughput screening assay for inhibitors of heat-shock protein 90 ATPase activity. Analytical Biochemistry 327 176–183.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]

Sain N, Krishnan B, Ormerod MG, De RA, Liu WM, Kaye SB, Workman P & Jackman AL 2006 Potentiation of paclitaxel activity by the HSP90 inhibitor 17-allylamino-17-demethoxygeldanamycin in human ovarian carcinoma cell lines with high levels of activated AKT. Molecular Cancer Therapeutics 5 1197–1208.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Sanderson S, Valenti M, Gowan S, Patterson L, Ahmad Z, Workman P & Eccles SA 2006 Benzoquinone ansamycin heat shock protein 90 inhibitors modulate multiple functions required for tumor angiogenesis. Molecular Cancer Therapeutics 5 522–532.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Scheufler C, Brinker A, Bourenkov G, Pegoraro S, Moroder L, Bartunik H, Hartl FU & Moarefi I 2000 Structure of TPR domain-peptide complexes: critical elements in the assembly of the Hsp70-Hsp90 multichaperone machine. Cell 101 199–210.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]

Schnur RC, Corman ML, Gallaschun RJ, Cooper BA, Dee MF, Doty JL, Muzzi ML, DiOrio CI, Barbacci EG, Miller PE et al. 1995a erbB-2 oncogene inhibition by geldanamycin derivatives: synthesis, mechanism of action, and structure-activity relationships. Journal of Medicinal Chemistry 38 3813–3820.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]

Schnur RC, Corman ML, Gallaschun RJ, Cooper BA, Dee MF, Doty JL, Muzzi ML, Moyer JD, DiOrio CI, Barbacci EG et al. 1995b Inhibition of the oncogene product p185erbB-2 in vitro and in vivo by geldanamycin and dihydrogeldanamycin derivatives. Journal of Medicinal Chemistry 38 3806–3812.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]

Schweinfest CW, Graber MW, Henderson KW, Papas TS, Baron PL & Watson DK 1998 Cloning and sequence analysis of Hsp89alpha DeltaN, a new member of theHsp90 gene family. Biochimica et Biophysica Acta 1398 18–24.[Medline]

Shah NP, Nicoll JM, Nagar B, Gorre ME, Paquette RL, Kuriyan J & Sawyers CL 2002 Multiple BCR-ABL kinase domain mutations confer polyclonal resistance to the tyrosine kinase inhibitor imatinib (STI571) in chronic phase and blast crisis chronic myeloid leukemia. Cancer Cell 2 117–125.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]

Sharp S & Workman P 2006 Inhibitors of the HSP90 molecular chaperone: current status. Advances in Cancer Research 95 323–348.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]

Sharp SY, Kelland LR, Valenti MR, Brunton LA, Hobbs S & Workman P 2000 Establishment of an isogenic human colon tumor model for NQO1 gene expression: application to investigate the role of DT-diaphorase in bioreductive drug activation in vitro and in vivo. Molecular Pharmacology 58 1146–1155.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Smith V, Hobbs S, Court W, Eccles S, Workman P & Kelland LR 2002 ErbB2 overexpression in an ovarian cancer cell line confers sensitivity to the HSP90 inhibitor geldanamycin. Anticancer Research 22 1993–1999.[Web of Science][Medline]

Smith V, Sausville EA, Camalier RF, Fiebig HH & Burger AM 2005 Comparison of 17-dimethylaminoethylamino-17-demethoxygeldanamycin (17DMAG) and 17-ally-lamino-17-demethoxygeldanamycin (17AAG) in vitro: effects on Hsp90 and client proteins in melanoma models. Cancer Chemotherapy and Pharmacology 56 126–137.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]

Sreedhar AS, Kalmar E, Csermely P & Shen YF 2004 Hsp90 isoforms: functions, expression and clinical importance. FEBS Letters 562 11–15.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]

Stebbins CE, Russo AA, Schneider C, Rosen N, Hartl FU & Pavletich NP 1997 Crystal structure of an Hsp90-geldanamycin complex: targeting of a protein chaperone by an antitumor agent. Cell 89 239–250.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]

Supko JG, Hickman RL, Grever MR & Malspeis L 1995 Preclinical pharmacologic evaluation of geldanamycin as an antitumor agent. Cancer Chemotherapy and Pharmacology 36 305–315.[Web of Science][Medline]

Whitesell L & Lindquist SL 2005 HSP90 and the chaperoning of cancer. Nature Reviews. Cancer 5 761–772.

Whitesell L, Bagatell R & Falsey R 2003 The stress response: implications for the clinical development of hsp90 inhibitors. Current Cancer Drug Targets 3 349–358.[CrossRef][Medline]

Workman P 2003 Strategies for treating cancers caused by multiple genome abnormalities: from concepts to cures? Current Opinion in Investigational Drugs 4 1410–1415.

Workman P 2004 Combinatorial attack on multistep oncogenesis by inhibiting the Hsp90 molecular chaperone. Cancer Letters 206 149–157.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]

Workman P 2005 Drugging the cancer kinome: progress and challenges in developing personalized molecular cancer therapeutics. Cold Spring Harbor Symposia on Quantitative Biology 70 499–515.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Wright L, Barril X, Dymock B, Sheridan L, Surgenor A, Beswick M, Drysdale M, Collier A, Massey A, Davies N et al. 2004 Structure-activity relationships in purine-based inhibitor binding to HSP90 isoforms. Chemistry and Biology 11 775–785.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]

Yarden Y & Sliwkowski MX 2001 Untangling the ErbB signalling network. Nature Reviews. Molecular Cell Biology 2 127–137.

Yu X, Guo ZS, Marcu MG, Neckers L, Nguyen DM, Chen GA & Schrump DS 2002 Modulation of p53, ErbB1, ErbB2, and Raf-1 expression in lung cancer cells by depsipeptide FR901228. Journal of the National Cancer Institute 94 504–513.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Zhang L, Yu J, Park BH, Kinzler KW & Vogelstein B 2000 Role of BAX in the apoptotic response to anticancer agents. Science 290 989–992.[Abstract/Free Full Text]




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
BloodHome page
C. Stuehler, S. Mielke, M. Chatterjee, J. Duell, S. Lurati, F. Rueckert, H. Einsele, R. C. Bargou, and M. S. Topp
Selective depletion of alloreactive T cells by targeted therapy of heat shock protein 90: a novel strategy for control of graft-versus-host disease
Blood, September 24, 2009; 114(13): 2829 - 2836.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Clin. Cancer Res.Home page
R. Bao, C.-J. Lai, H. Qu, D. Wang, L. Yin, B. Zifcak, R. Atoyan, J. Wang, M. Samson, J. Forrester, et al.
CUDC-305, a Novel Synthetic HSP90 Inhibitor with Unique Pharmacologic Properties for Cancer Therapy
Clin. Cancer Res., June 15, 2009; 15(12): 4046 - 4057.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Cancer Res.Home page
F. Cervantes-Gomez, R. Nimmanapalli, and V. Gandhi
Transcription Inhibition of Heat Shock Proteins: A Strategy for Combination of 17-Allylamino-17-Demethoxygeldanamycin and Actinomycin D
Cancer Res., May 1, 2009; 69(9): 3947 - 3954.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
The OncologistHome page
J. S. Ross, E. A. Slodkowska, W. F. Symmans, L. Pusztai, P. M. Ravdin, and G. N. Hortobagyi
The HER-2 Receptor and Breast Cancer: Ten Years of Targeted Anti-HER-2 Therapy and Personalized Medicine
Oncologist, April 1, 2009; 14(4): 320 - 368.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
BloodHome page
C. Fonseca, R. Soiffer, V. Ho, M. Vanneman, M. Jinushi, J. Ritz, D. Neuberg, R. Stone, D. DeAngelo, and G. Dranoff
Protein disulfide isomerases are antibody targets during immune-mediated tumor destruction
Blood, February 19, 2009; 113(8): 1681 - 1688.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Clin. Cancer Res.Home page
U. Banerji
Heat Shock Protein 90 as a Drug Target: Some Like It Hot
Clin. Cancer Res., January 1, 2009; 15(1): 9 - 14.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Drug Metab. Dispos.Home page
W. Guo, P. Reigan, D. Siegel, and D. Ross
Enzymatic Reduction and Glutathione Conjugation of Benzoquinone Ansamycin Heat Shock Protein 90 Inhibitors: Relevance for Toxicity and Mechanism of Action
Drug Metab. Dispos., October 1, 2008; 36(10): 2050 - 2057.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Cancer Res.Home page
A. K. McCollum, C. J. TenEyck, B. Stensgard, B. W. Morlan, K. V. Ballman, R. B. Jenkins, D. O. Toft, and C. Erlichman
P-Glycoprotein-Mediated Resistance to Hsp90-Directed Therapy Is Eclipsed by the Heat Shock Response
Cancer Res., September 15, 2008; 68(18): 7419 - 7427.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Pharmacol. Exp. Ther.Home page
R. R. Almon, E. Yang, W. Lai, I. P. Androulakis, D. C. DuBois, and W. J. Jusko
Circadian Variations in Rat Liver Gene Expression: Relationships to Drug Actions
J. Pharmacol. Exp. Ther., September 1, 2008; 326(3): 700 - 716.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
GeneticsHome page
M. A. Alaamery and C. S. Hoffman
Schizosaccharomyces pombe Hsp90/Git10 Is Required for Glucose/cAMP Signaling
Genetics, April 1, 2008; 178(4): 1927 - 1936.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Physiol. Lung Cell. Mol. Physiol.Home page
A. Chatterjee, C. Snead, G. Yetik-Anacak, G. Antonova, J. Zeng, and J. D. Catravas
Heat shock protein 90 inhibitors attenuate LPS-induced endothelial hyperpermeability
Am J Physiol Lung Cell Mol Physiol, April 1, 2008; 294(4): L755 - L763.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Molecular Cancer TherapeuticsHome page
U. Banerji, A. Affolter, I. Judson, R. Marais, and P. Workman
BRAF and NRAS mutations in melanoma: potential relationships to clinical response to HSP90 inhibitors
Mol. Cancer Ther., April 1, 2008; 7(4): 737 - 739.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Ann OncolHome page
M. M. McCarthy, E. Pick, Y. Kluger, B. Gould-Rothberg, R. Lazova, R. L. Camp, D. L. Rimm, and H. M. Kluger
HSP90 as a marker of progression in melanoma
Ann. Onc., March 1, 2008; 19(3): 590 - 594.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Endocr Relat CancerHome page
Consensus Statement
Endocr. Relat. Cancer, December 1, 2006; 13(Supplement_1): S1 - S2.
[Full Text] [PDF]


This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Powers, M. V
Right arrow Articles by Workman, P.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Powers, M. V
Right arrow Articles by Workman, P.


HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS