HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS		QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced] Author: Keyword(s): Year:  Vol:  Page:

This Article Abstract Full Text (PDF) Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Services Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in Web of Science Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Download to citation manager Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Web of Science (12) Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Schott, M. Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by Schott, M.

Endocrine Cancer Center, Department of Endocrinology, Diabetes and Rheumatology, University Hospital Dusseldorf, Moorenstr. 5, D-40225 Dusseldorf, Germany

(Requests for offprints should be addressed to M Schott; Email: schottmt{at}uni-duesseldorf.de)

	Abstract

Top Abstract Introduction DC pathways and functional... DCs and immune tolerance In vitro generation of... Maturation of DCs Loading methods in tumour... Route of DC administration Frequency of DC administration DC immunotherapy in non... DC immunotherapy in non-thyroid... DC immunotherapy in MTC Potential tumour antigens in... DC vaccination trials in... Concluding remarks and future... References

 
Dendritic cells (DCs) are highly efficient antigen-presenting cells in the immune system with the potential to regulate the system and induce a cytotoxic T-cell response. As a proof of principle, a multitude of animal and human studies has demonstrated that immunization with antigen-loaded DCs may lead to anti-tumour immune responses with tumour regression and rejection of cancer. The identification of tumour antigens that can be recognized by T lymphocytes has facilitated the development of new protocols and enabled immunologists to monitor immune responses. However, to date, long-term clinical effects on larger numbers of cancer patients are missing, and there is no generally accepted DC generation or activation protocol. This review will focus on the most important findings on the role of DCs within the immune system and how to generate and activate these cells in order to induce cytotoxic immunity in non-endocrine and endocrine malignancies. Recently, we and other researchers reported on DC vaccinations in patients with endocrine malignancies mainly in metastasized medullary thyroid carcinoma resulting in tumour-specific immunity and partial clinical responses in some cases. Based on these and other in vitro data, new DC vaccination protocols for the treatment of patients with endocrine tumours have now been conducted.

	Introduction

Top Abstract Introduction DC pathways and functional... DCs and immune tolerance In vitro generation of... Maturation of DCs Loading methods in tumour... Route of DC administration Frequency of DC administration DC immunotherapy in non... DC immunotherapy in non-thyroid... DC immunotherapy in MTC Potential tumour antigens in... DC vaccination trials in... Concluding remarks and future... References

 
Therapeutic cancer vaccines are intended to activate the immune system for treating an existing tumour or preventing its recurrence. Anti-tumour immunity is coordinated by both innate and adaptive immunity, and mainly mediated by cytotoxic T cells (CTLs), natural killer (NK) cells and natural killer T (NKT) cells. The main players within this context are dendritic cells (DCs), which induce, coordinate and regulate the system (Steinman 1991, Banchereau et al. 2000). DCs are highly potent antigen-presenting cells (APCs) with the unique ability of taking up and processing antigens in the peripheral blood and tissues. They subsequently migrate to the draining lymph nodes, where they present antigens to naíve T lymphocytes, and thus induce a cellular immune response involving both CD4 + T helper 1 (Th1) cells and cytotoxic CD8 + T cells. Moreover, DCs are also important in inducing humoral immunity as explained by their capacity to activate naíve and memory B cells (Jego et al. 2003). In addition, NK (Fernandez et al. 1999) and NKT cells (Kadowaki et al. 2001) may also be activated by DCs. Thus, DCs can modulate the whole immune repertoire, thereby representing an excellent tool for immunization against cancer.

Since their first description in 1973 (Steinman & Cohn 1973), DCs generated ex vivo have been used for vaccination in a multitude of different studies in murine models and humans. These studies provided the proof of principle that DC vaccines can work under these conditions. Despite this, the efficacy of anti-tumour immunization has recently been questioned (Rosenberg et al. 2004), which was chiefly due to the very limited number of cancer patients with objective (long-term) clinical responses. The question is, however, not whether DC immunizations work in humans, but rather where to direct future research focus in order to improve clinical efficacy rates. This review article will focus not only on the recent developments in DC physiology in the context of anti-tumour immunity, but also on the vaccination trials already performed in non-endocrine and endocrine malignancies such as medullary thyroid carcinoma (MTC). Finally, future perspectives as to how vaccination protocols might be improved will be discussed.

	DC pathways and functional differences

Top Abstract Introduction DC pathways and functional... DCs and immune tolerance In vitro generation of... Maturation of DCs Loading methods in tumour... Route of DC administration Frequency of DC administration DC immunotherapy in non... DC immunotherapy in non-thyroid... DC immunotherapy in MTC Potential tumour antigens in... DC vaccination trials in... Concluding remarks and future... References

 
Until recently, two main pathways of differentiation of DCs have been known (Banchereau et al. 2000, Shortman & Liu 2002). The myeloid pathway results in two subsets – Langerhans cells found in stratified epithelia such as the skin, and interstitial DCs found in all other tissues (Caux et al. 1996). Plasmocytoid DCs (pDCs) are generated in line with the lymphoid pathway. These cells are very strong inducers of a cytotoxic immunity (Cella et al. 1999), secreting high amounts of type I interferons (IFN- and IFN-ß) after viral infection (Cella et al. 1999, Siegal et al. 1999). Most recently, a third of the DC subtype has been independently described by two groups (Chan et al. 2006, Taieb et al. 2006). These cells are distinct from conventional DCs and pDCs with the molecular expression profile of both NK cells and DCs. They are termed IFN-producing killer DCs (IKDCs) due to their ability to produce substantial amounts of type I IFNs and kill target cells by tumour necrosis factor (TNF)-related apoptosis-inducing ligand (TRAIL) pathways (Fig. 1). Further studies, however, will be needed to characterize their function and investigate the IKDC lineage in detail.

View larger version (28K): [in this window] [in a new window]   Figure 1 Dendritic cell (DC) lineages. Two main pathways of DC differentiation were known until recently. The myeloid pathway results in two subsets: Langerhans cells found in stratified epithelia, and interstitial DCs found in all other tissues. Plasmocytoid DCs are generated in line with the lymphoid pathway. These cells are very strong inducers of a cytotoxic immunity, as they secrete high amounts of type I IFNs. Under in vitro conditions, immature DCs may also be generated from monocytes by culturing with granulocyte/macrophage colony-stimulating factor (GM-CSF) and interleukin-4 (IL-4), and are known as IL4-DCs. Maturation of these DCs might be reached by additional culturing with tumour-necrosis factor (TNF-). Most in vivo studies published so far have used these cells for vaccination. Recently, a new DC subtype has been described in the murine model by two groups independently (Chan et al. 2006, Taieb et al. 2006) termed as interferon-producing killer DCs (IKDCs) with the capacity to directly kill target cells. There are as yet no phenotypical analyses on any IKDC precursor cells in mice (*). To date, in the human system, IKDCs in general have neither been identified.

Different DC subtypes also reveal different functions (Fig. 2). For instance, splenic CD8 + DCs in the murine system prime naíve CD4 + T cells to secrete Th1 cytokines in a process that involves IL-12, whereas splenic CD8 + DCs prime naíve CD4 + T cells to produce Th2 cytokines (Maldonado-Lopez et al. 1999, Pulendran et al. 1999). This polarization also depends on the signals received by the DCs. In humans, for instance, monocyte-derived DCs activated by CD40 ligand (CD40L) prime Th1-cell responses through an IL-12-dependent mechanism, whereas pDCs activated by IL-3 and CD40L have been shown to secrete only small amounts of IL-12 and prime Th2-cell responses (Rissoan et al. 1999). Thus, both the type of DC subset and the activation signals to which DCs are exposed are important in the polarization of T cells (Banchereau & Palucka 2005).

View larger version (57K): [in this window] [in a new window]   Figure 2 Comparison of immature and mature dendritic cells in anti-tumour immunity. (A) Immature dendritic cells (DCs) promote immune tolerance. After recruitment to tumour sites, DCs capture antigens (from necrotic or apoptotic tumour cells) and migrate in small numbers to draining lymph nodes. In the absence of stimulation, DCs remain in an immature state. Tumour antigens are presented to T cells, however, without co-stimulation (CD80 and CD86) leading to deletion of T lymphocytes or the generation of interleukin 10 secreting inducible regulatory T cells. (B) Mature DCs induce immunity. Stimulation of immature DCs induces the maturation process and migration of large quantities of DCs to the draining lymph nodes. The mature DCs express high numbers of MHC class I and class II molecules as well as co-stimulatory molecules. Captured tumour antigens are expressed not only on MHC class II, but also on MHC class I molecules to CD4 + Th-lymphocytes and CD8 + CTLs. This phenomenon of presentation of exogenous antigens on MHC class I molecules is termed ‘cross-presentation’. Interaction between DCs and Th cells further activates both cell types and increases their ability to stimulate CTLs, which are then able to lyse tumour cells that have downregulated MHC class I molecules. In addition, DCs can stimulate natural killer (NK) cells. In response to IL-12 released by DCs, NK cells upregulate both cytolytic activity and production of interferon- (IFN-). At the same time, activated DCs may recruit additional NK cells from the blood stream due to the release of IL-8. Activated NK cells are able to kill immature DCs through NKp30, which is an activating NK-cell receptor. This might be a mechanism by which NK cells limit the recruitment and activation of immature DCs in tumour tissues. However, NK cells may also induce DC maturation. The expansion of CD4 + CD25 + regulatory T cells is another process, which downregulates the immune response.

	DCs and immune tolerance

Top Abstract Introduction DC pathways and functional... DCs and immune tolerance In vitro generation of... Maturation of DCs Loading methods in tumour... Route of DC administration Frequency of DC administration DC immunotherapy in non... DC immunotherapy in non-thyroid... DC immunotherapy in MTC Potential tumour antigens in... DC vaccination trials in... Concluding remarks and future... References

	In vitro generation of DCs

Top Abstract Introduction DC pathways and functional... DCs and immune tolerance In vitro generation of... Maturation of DCs Loading methods in tumour... Route of DC administration Frequency of DC administration DC immunotherapy in non... DC immunotherapy in non-thyroid... DC immunotherapy in MTC Potential tumour antigens in... DC vaccination trials in... Concluding remarks and future... References

 
The research groups of Romani et al. and Sallusto et al. were the first to describe the generation of immature DCs by cultivating the monocytes with GM-CSF and IL-4 (Romani et al. 1994, Sallusto & Lanzavecchia 1994). Since then, there has been a multitude of vaccination trials mostly on immunogenic metastatic melanoma (Nestle et al. 1998, Thurner et al. 1999). Recent discoveries, however, point out some alternatives to the classical method of DC generation; for instance, IL-15-DCs are thought to be more efficient in inducing antigen-specific CTL differentiation in vitro, whereas the ability of CD4 + T-cell stimulation seems to be equal (Mohamadzadeh et al. 2001). In addition, IFN-DCs generated in 3-day culture are efficient in inducing immunity also. This has been shown in the severe combined immuno deficiency (SCID) mouse model (Santini et al. 2000) as well as in the human system (Parlato et al. 2001, Tosi et al. 2004). We have used this procedure for immunizing patients with metastasized MTC, resulting in tumour-specific immunity in some cases (unpublished data).

Apart from monocytes, other cell types have also been used as progenitors for DC vaccinations. Peripheral-blood DCs loaded with specific antigens have been administered to patients with follicular B-cell lymphoma (Hsu et al. 1996) and prostate cancer (Small et al. 2000). Furthermore, an Flt3-based DC enrichment results in immunological and clinical response in some patients (Fong et al. 2001c), and CD34 + haematopoietic progenitor cells (CD34-DCs) have also been applied in the DC immunization in cancer patients with increased rates of measurable clinical response in patients recognizing more than two antigens (Banchereau et al. 2001). In summary, a standardized DC generation protocol as recently proposed (Figdor et al. 2004) is still a matter of debate, and no consensus has been reached. Intensive work is still needed to solve this problem in the future.

	Maturation of DCs

Top Abstract Introduction DC pathways and functional... DCs and immune tolerance In vitro generation of... Maturation of DCs Loading methods in tumour... Route of DC administration Frequency of DC administration DC immunotherapy in non... DC immunotherapy in non-thyroid... DC immunotherapy in MTC Potential tumour antigens in... DC vaccination trials in... Concluding remarks and future... References

 
Immature DCs have long since been recognized as highly potent in capturing antigens, whereas mature DCs are highly efficient in presenting exogenous antigens on major histocompatibility complex (MHC) class I and II molecules. The maturation of DCs is closely related to the physiological migration of these cells from the periphery to the draining lymph nodes. This process is associated with various coordinated events such as the upregulation of co-stimulatory molecules (CD80 and CD86), loss of phagocytic receptors, and changes and upregulation of MHC class II compartments. The immature DCs generated over the GM-CSF/IL-4 pathway do not lead to a marked immune response, whereas the mature DCs induce a specific immune response in the same patient (Jonuleit et al. 2001). When generated using a ‘standard method’ with a cocktail of proinflammatory cytokines (IL-1ß, IFN, IL-6 and prostaglandin E₂) (Jonuleit et al. 1997), these cells induce functionally superior CD8 + T cells and polarize CD4 + T cells towards IFN- production (Schuler-Thurner et al. 2002). Nevertheless, this method needs to be examined in parallel with other stimuli. Indeed, the combination of IL-1ß and TNF with type I and type II IFNs (IFN- and IFN- respectively) seems to yield more potent DCs in terms of secretion of IL-12 and induction of tumour-specific CTLs in vitro (Mailliard et al. 2004). An important step will be to identify the stimuli that trigger a desired DC maturation programme leading to the induction of tumour-specific CTLs, but not regulatory T cells. Toll-like receptor ligands in general may represent such a stimulus, leading to enhanced DC function (Reis e Sousa 2001).

	Loading methods in tumour antigens

Top Abstract Introduction DC pathways and functional... DCs and immune tolerance In vitro generation of... Maturation of DCs Loading methods in tumour... Route of DC administration Frequency of DC administration DC immunotherapy in non... DC immunotherapy in non-thyroid... DC immunotherapy in MTC Potential tumour antigens in... DC vaccination trials in... Concluding remarks and future... References

 
There are different methods of antigen loading of the DCs. A very common method is co-culturing the purified tumour antigens or tumour lysate (TL) with DCs. This approach has been successfully used, for instance, in malignant melanoma, resulting in CTL immune and clinical responses in some patients (Nestle et al. 1998). In our studies on patients with neuroendocrine malignancies, we demonstrated a TL-specific immune response in one patient with parathyroid carcinoma (Schott et al. 1999) and another with neuroendocrine pancreas carcinoma (NEC) (Schott et al. 2001a). However, several other methods of antigen delivery into DCs have been investigated to facilitate and improve antigen uptake and presentation. MHC class I- and II-restricted 9–15 amino acid peptides derived from defined antigens (natural sequences or peptide analogues designed for enhanced binding to the MHC molecules or T-cell receptor) can be easily synthesized in good manufacturing practice (GMP) form and used for specific antigen loading (Gilboa 1999, Wang et al. 1999). Although this technique is important for proof-of-principle studies, the use of peptides has limitations, such as the limited number of well-characterized tumour-associated antigens and the relatively high turnover of exogenous peptide MHC complexes, resulting in comparatively low antigen presentation by the time the DCs arrive in the draining lymph node after injection, and the induction of a restricted repertoire of T-cell clones, thereby limiting the ability of the immune system to control the tumour antigen variation. Therefore, the use of so-called modified heteroclitic peptides needs to be discussed in this context. It is known that some peptides including those derived from the immunodominant antigens do not bind to MHC class I molecules with high affinity, possibly explaining their limited immunogenicity in vivo (Salgaller et al. 1996). The generation of peptide analogues with increased affinity to MHC class I molecules (known as heteroclitic peptides) may therefore be used to improve peptide immunogenicity (Parkhurst et al. 1996). In endocrine tumours, a comparable approach has already been used for patients with metastasized parathyroid carcinoma. These patients were immunized with modified parathyroid hormone (PTH) peptides together with Freund’s adjuvant resulting in a marked decrease in tumour markers and metastatic spread (Bradwell & Harvey 1999, Betea et al. 2004). In contrast, recent studies on patients with malignant melanoma have shown that T cells elicited in vivo by vaccination with heteroclitic melanoma tumour antigen (MART1 and glycoprotein 100 (gp100)) peptide show poor recognition of endogenous melanoma-derived peptide and less efficient tumour-cell lysis compared to T cells specific for the native peptides (Stuge et al. 2004). The most probable explanation is that these peptides differ from naturally processed epitopes. Thus, loading the DCs with total antigen preparations and allowing ‘natural’ processing and epitope selection is expected to improve efficacy, while allowing the generation of a diverse immune response involving many CD4 + T-cell and CTL clones. With this in mind, in our studies, we used whole calcitonin for immunization of the MTC patients and not certain peptides (Schott et al. 2001b).

A totally different approach of antigen delivery into DCs is to fuse the DCs with tumour cells. In this approach, the entire repertoire of tumour antigens, including those yet to be identified, is expressed with the immune-stimulating machinery of DCs. The fusion cell vaccine allows the induction of helper T and CTL responses by class II presentation of exogenous protein and class I presentation of newly synthesized endogenous protein. Vaccination with fusion cells has eradicated the established tumours in various animal models (Gong et al. 1997, 2002). In human MUC1 transgenic mice, vaccination with fusion cells reverses immunological unresponsiveness to MUC1 and results in the rejection of MUC1-positive tumours (Gong et al. 1998). Preclinical studies with patient-derived breast cancer cells and DCs have also demonstrated that fusion cells induce tumour-specific CTL responses and lysis of autologous tumour cells (Gong et al. 2000). Most recently, Avigan et al.(2004) confirmed these results by demonstrating a Th1 immunity and clinical response in patients with metastatic breast and renal cancer. Most of the works in this field have been published from the group mentioned earlier. Therefore, these data await confirmation by others. In our studies, we were able to demonstrate that DCs might be fused with the tumour cells shown to have high efficacy rates in adrenal carcinoma cells (Papewalis et al. 2006). Using electron microscopy, we could demonstrate viable cells indicated by intact basal membranes. So far, however, we were successful only in cell lines and not in primary cultures of endocrine tumours.

There are some additional methods of antigen delivery such as the presentation of DCs to dead tumour cells aiming the phagocytosis of tumour cell particles by DCs and to present them (Albert et al. 1998, Berard et al. 2000). Indeed, DCs cultured with killed allogeneic melanoma, prostate- or breast-cancer cell lines prime naíve CD8 + T cells against tumour antigens in vitro (Berard et al. 2000, Neidhardt-Berard et al. 2004). Recently, DC vaccination was reported to lead to the induction of tumour-specific T-cell immunity and ‘long-lasting’ tumour regression after co-culturing with a killed allogeneic melanoma cell line in two out of twenty patients (Banchereau & Palucka 2005).

Finally, the transfection of RNA coding for defined antigens by electroporation may represent an elegant method of antigen delivery (Van Tendeloo et al. 2001). RNA transfection does not require expensive production of GMP quality proteins or antibodies. In addition, RNA also appears advantageous over other transfection methods with naked DNA or viral transfection, as RNA transfection leads only to the transient antigen expression; however, this is sufficient for antigen processing and presentation.

	Route of DC administration

Top Abstract Introduction DC pathways and functional... DCs and immune tolerance In vitro generation of... Maturation of DCs Loading methods in tumour... Route of DC administration Frequency of DC administration DC immunotherapy in non... DC immunotherapy in non-thyroid... DC immunotherapy in MTC Potential tumour antigens in... DC vaccination trials in... Concluding remarks and future... References

 
Various studies have demonstrated that antigen-loaded DCs might prime T-cell responses regardless of the route of DC administration. However, the quality of responses might be affected. This has been demonstrated by the predominant induction of Th1-cell responses after intralymphatic and intradermal administration, albeit with non-polarized T-cell and antibody responses after i.v. injection (Fong et al. 2001b). Moreover, in murine studies, the induction of tissue-specific immunity was associated with the tissue origin of DCs (Mora et al. 2003, Mullins et al. 2003). In a murine melanoma model, both s.c. and i.v. immunizations with peptide-pulsed DCs induced peptide-specific memory T cells in the spleen, resulting in the control of pulmonary metastatic spread. On the other hand, s.c. immunization also induced memory T cells in the lymph nodes, allowing subsequent protection against s.c. tumour growth. Intravenous injection of DCs failed to do so (Mullins et al. 2003). Thus, DCs can prime T cells with different homing capacities. For clinical application, the consequence of such an instructive role of DCs is that, for example, i.v. administration of DCs in neuroendocrine tumours with disseminated metastatic spread could induce homing in effector cells, whereas DC vaccinations against melanoma would unlikely induce skin-homing in effector cells. All vaccinations were administered subcutaneously in our studies on patients with MTC, resulting in tumour-specific immune responses in some of them.

	Frequency of DC administration

Top Abstract Introduction DC pathways and functional... DCs and immune tolerance In vitro generation of... Maturation of DCs Loading methods in tumour... Route of DC administration Frequency of DC administration DC immunotherapy in non... DC immunotherapy in non-thyroid... DC immunotherapy in MTC Potential tumour antigens in... DC vaccination trials in... Concluding remarks and future... References

 
The frequency of DC administration has been reported to play an important role in the immune response; four vaccinations with CD34-DCs (within a 6-week period) have been reported to result in short-lived antigen-specific CD8 + T-cell immunity in some patients (Paczesny et al. 2004). During follow-up, all patients lost specific T cells that were detectable by direct ELISPOT. There are several possible explanations for this phenomenon. One could be that T cells may migrate from blood to peripheral tissue or tumour site (Masopust et al. 2001). Another could be that vaccinations had been administered frequently resulting in T-cell tolerance and anergy. In contrast, mouse and human studies on vaccination against infectious agents indicated that priming should be followed by a booster vaccination after 4–6 weeks for optimal immune response (Kaech et al. 2002, Zinkernagel 2003). However, whether this can be applied to cancer immunotherapy is still a matter of debate, and no consensus has been reached. In our studies on patients with MTC, we have demonstrated, for instance, that 12 DC vaccinations in one patient resulted in an antigen-specific Th1 immune response and decrease in metastatic spread (Schott et al. 2001b). This indicates that frequent immunizations may not be tolerogenic as recently proposed.

	DC immunotherapy in non-endocrine malignancies

Top Abstract Introduction DC pathways and functional... DCs and immune tolerance In vitro generation of... Maturation of DCs Loading methods in tumour... Route of DC administration Frequency of DC administration DC immunotherapy in non... DC immunotherapy in non-thyroid... DC immunotherapy in MTC Potential tumour antigens in... DC vaccination trials in... Concluding remarks and future... References

 
Within the last decade, a variety of early clinical studies with DC vaccines have been performed in different human tumour entities leading to the anti-tumour immunity in most cases. Owing to the brevity of this review, it is possible to summarize only some of these studies. Most of the research has been conducted on patients with immunogenic malignant melanoma. An update of the first study by Nestle et al.(1998), in which monocyte-derived DCs loaded with CD4 + T-cell stimulator keyhole limpet haemocyanin (KLH) and either tumour peptides (MAGE-3A1) or TL were intranodally delivered, showed tumour regression in 6 out of 11 patients with complete remission in two cases, which lasted for several years. A reanalysis by tetramer staining of antigen-specific T cells confirmed the strong induction of MAGE-3A1-specific CTLs (Thurner et al. 1999). The authors reported that the treatment of skin metastases was accompanied by infiltration with CTLs, suggesting the effective activation of a cytotoxic anti-tumour immune response. Another study directly compared the immunogenicity of immature DCs and those activated in monocyte-conditioned medium on intranodal administration into the opposite inguinal lymph nodes (Jonuleit et al. 2001). The mature DCs were clearly superior inducers of the effector T cells directed against two recall antigens (tetanus toxoid and purified protein derivative/ tuberculin) and, more importantly, tumour peptides. Banchereau et al.(2001) demonstrated a correlation between clinical success after DC immunization and the number of antigen-specific reactivities – six out of seven metastatic melanoma patients who developed immunity to less than two melanoma antigens showed progressive disease, in contrast to tumour progression in only one of the ten patients with immunity to more than two antigens. A long-term follow-up on melanoma patients treated by the same research group supported this concept, as most melanoma patients with CTL reactivities towards more than two antigens survived longer than median survival time (Fay et al. 2005). Another study by Berger et al.(2004) demonstrated a broad T-cell response in a DC-treated patient towards different tumour-associated antigens. Finally, de Vries et al.(2005) reported a strong correlation between the presence of DC-vaccine-related T cells in delayed type hypersensitivity (DTH) biopsies and a positive clinical outcome.

Several other studies have been performed on prostate cancer using cell-associated antigens as targets for DC immunization therapies. So far, three cell-specific antigens, the prostate-specific antigen (PSA), prostate-specific membrane antigen (PSMA) and prostatic acid phosphatase (PAP) have been used. Tjoa et al.(1998) reported on partial tumour regressions in nine out of 33 patients suffering from an advanced disease stage after i.v. infusion of DCs pulsed with human leukocyte antigen (HLA)-A0201-specific peptides from PSMA. Later studies have confirmed the initial results of clinical response in about a third of 19 cases treated (Tjoa et al. 1999, Murphy et al. 2000). Recently, another group reported on an in vivo immune response (DTH skin reactivity) in 50% of 28 prostate cancer patients after vaccination with PSA peptide-pulsed DCs. An epitope-specific in vitro tumour cell lysis could be detected in four of them (Perambakam et al. 2005). An interesting xenoantigen immunization approach was taken by Fong et al. (2001a), who administered DCs isolated from immobilized aphaereses and pulsed with mouse PAP (two monthly vaccinations either i.v., i.d. or into a lymph node). All 21 patients with metastatic prostate cancer developed Th1 responses to mouse PAP, and 11 also developed responses to the homogenous self-antigen, and six subjects showed clinical stabilization in their previously progressing prostate cancer. Small et al.(2000) treated 31 patients suffering from prostate cancer with infusions of a cellular vaccine prepared by isolating a DC precursor-enriched fraction from the aphaeresis products, which were then exposed to a recombinant fusion protein consisting of PAP linked to the GM-CSF for 2 days. The fusion protein presumably targets the cells expressing GM-CSF receptor, including DC precursors, which then undergo maturation in vitro. This cellular vaccine (termed APC8015 or Provenge, Dendreon Corp., Seattle, WA, USA), which contains a variable percentage of DCs (a mean of 123 million DCs at 18% purity) was infused intravenously at weeks 0, 4, 8 and 24. All patients developed immune responses to the fusion protein, and 38% developed immune responses to the PAP. An alternative approach for treating prostate cancer may be the use of RNA for transfection of DCs. The studies by Heiser et al.(2002) demonstrated the induction of polyclonal prostate cancer-specific CTLs in all 13 patients treated for metastatic prostate cancer following the stimulation with PSA mRNA-transfected DCs and transient clearance of the circulating tumour cells in the peripheral blood. However, no significant clinical response was reported.

Promising results were also demonstrated in several other cancer forms such as malignant lymphoma. Hsu et al.(1996) were the first worldwide to use DCs in the vaccination of human beings with conditions such as lymphoma. The follow-up studies demonstrated in vitro CTL responses as well as partial clinical responses in some patients (Timmerman et al. 2002). Several other studies have been performed in renal cell carcinoma (Holtl et al. 1998, 2002), colon carcinoma (Morse et al. 1999) or malignant glioma (Yu et al. 2001).

So far, DC vaccinations in humans have been performed in small clinical trials to demonstrate the potential efficacy and assess the safety of DC immunizations. All clinical trials reported only minor side effects, suggesting that DC-based immunotherapy is safe. The majority of the symptoms, including local erythema, indurations, pain at the site of injection, low-grade fever, bouts of sweating and chills, are part of the intended activation of an immune response. Some studies in metastasized melanoma observed localized vitiligo and induction of thyroid-stimulating hormone-receptor antibodies or antinuclear antibodies. However, no severe vaccination-associated autoimmune reactions were described (Nestle et al. 1998, Banchereau et al. 2001).

	DC immunotherapy in non-thyroid endocrine malignancies

Top Abstract Introduction DC pathways and functional... DCs and immune tolerance In vitro generation of... Maturation of DCs Loading methods in tumour... Route of DC administration Frequency of DC administration DC immunotherapy in non... DC immunotherapy in non-thyroid... DC immunotherapy in MTC Potential tumour antigens in... DC vaccination trials in... Concluding remarks and future... References

 
Most metastasized endocrine carcinomas are incurable by conventional radiotherapy or chemotherapy, and the outcome is usually fatal. Therefore, new strategies are required for the treatment of these cancer types. The lack of specific tumour antigens is the major problem facing immunotherapy in endocrine tumours. This dilemma may be overcome by the use of tumour cell preparations (proteins or mRNA) or antigens specifically expressed in tumour cells (specific enzymes involved in the synthesis of hormones or polypeptide hormones (PTH)). Both approaches have been tested in pilot studies on patients at advanced stages of disease with the aim of minimizing the growth of metastatic lesions or controlling the hormone activity. One patient suffered from PTH carcinoma, which caused hypercalcaemic symptoms, including severe bone pain, profound weight loss and extreme muscle weakness. A second patient presented with a metastasized NEC, which was strongly positive for chromogranin A (CgA). After several rounds of vaccination with TL-pulsed DCs, both patients showed a dose-dependent proliferation of PBMCs towards yet unidentified antigen(s) within the TL and positive DTH reactivity, suggesting the induction of TL-specific T-lymphocytes (Schott et al. 1999, 2001a). Immunohistochemical analysis of a skin biopsy from the patient with the NEC revealed CD4 + and CD8 + T lymphocyte infiltration providing indirect evidence for the induction of tumour-specific cytotoxic immunity. In the latter patient, therapy was accompanied by a temporary decrease in tumour marker CgA and slight tumour regression. During the follow-up, however, this patient experienced progressive metastatic spread.

In the second patient, serum PTH and calcium levels steadily increased. Therefore, the immunization protocol was changed and a synthetic PTH peptide was used for DC pulsing in combination with T-helper antigen KLH (Bradwell & Harvey 1999). Although the tumour masses did not decrease significantly, serum PTH declined following vaccination, suggesting partial destruction of the tumour cells. During the follow-up, the patient needed repeated bisphosphonate therapy, and eventually died of pneumonia. Despite this devastating outcome, this case was the first to demonstrate the ability of using a polypeptide hormone as antigen to induce cytotoxic immunity in an endocrine carcinoma (Schott et al. 2000).

Recently, we also performed a DC vaccination trial in two patients with adrenocortical carcinoma (Papewalis et al. 2006). Within this study, the mature DCs were generated as previously described (Schuler-Thurner et al. 2002). Irrespective of the lethal outcome of our patients, we could demonstrate that TL-pulsed auto-logous DCs are able to induce a TL-specific immune response. In one of the two patients, granzyme B-positive T cells could be detected.

	DC immunotherapy in MTC

Top Abstract Introduction DC pathways and functional... DCs and immune tolerance In vitro generation of... Maturation of DCs Loading methods in tumour... Route of DC administration Frequency of DC administration DC immunotherapy in non... DC immunotherapy in non-thyroid... DC immunotherapy in MTC Potential tumour antigens in... DC vaccination trials in... Concluding remarks and future... References

 
Our initial results prompted us and other researchers to design protocols for DC vaccination of patients with metastasized MTC. MTC, arising from parafollicular, calcitonin-producing C cells, represents an aggressive, usually slow-growing tumour occurring in both sporadic and familial forms such as multiple endocrine neoplasia type 2 (MEN 2) (Kebebew et al. 2000). Owing to its low chemosensitivity and radiosensitivity, no conventional therapy has been established for the metastatic state. In contrast, C cells of the thyroid gland are of neuroendocrine origin, and may therefore be highly susceptible to an immune attack, as are other neuroendocrine cells such as ß cells of the pancreas in autoimmune type 1 diabetes mellitus or parathyroid cells in autoimmune hypoparathyroidism (Ma et al. 2000, Kimura et al. 2001, Nakayama et al. 2005). Thus, MTC may represent a favourable carcinoma type for testing the cancer immunotherapy approaches in general.

	Potential tumour antigens in MTC

Top Abstract Introduction DC pathways and functional... DCs and immune tolerance In vitro generation of... Maturation of DCs Loading methods in tumour... Route of DC administration Frequency of DC administration DC immunotherapy in non... DC immunotherapy in non-thyroid... DC immunotherapy in MTC Potential tumour antigens in... DC vaccination trials in... Concluding remarks and future... References

 
So far, different specific and non-specific MTC-associated proteins are known to be the possible target molecules for immunotherapy in MTC. The most important is C-cell-specific polypeptide hormone calcitonin, which represents a highly sensitive tumour marker for detecting and monitoring metastatic spread in MTC. In a previous study by Zhang et al.(1997), an epitope mapping with monoclonal antibodies was performed showing highest immunogenicity of the central region of calcitonin (amino acids 13–21). Co-culturing with specific antibodies covering this region (amino acids 10–19) led to in vitro inhibition of MTC cell line growth (Zhang & DeGroot 1997). Using the preprohormone of calcitonin (preprocalcitonin, PPCT), another group demonstrated an antigen-specific immune response following the cDNA vaccination in a murine MTC model (Haupt et al. 2001). In this study, the precursor hormone of calcitonin was used instead of hCT, since this larger molecule has a greater probability of containing suitable epitopes than the mature hCT. To enhance the immune response, the authors combined this therapy with GM-CSF and IFN- (Chow et al. 1997, 1998, Chen et al. 1998), demonstrating PPCT-specific proliferative cellular and antibody responses following antigen–DNA vaccine occurred in the presence of the GM-CSF gene. In contrast, co-delivery of IFN- expression plasmid resulted in a decreased antibody response against hPPCT, which may however lead to enhanced Th1-like immunity (Macatonia et al. 1993, Chow et al. 1998). These data, together with the aforementioned reports on PTH-based tumour-specific immunity in vaccinated parathyroid carcinoma patients, represent the basis for using calcitonin as a specific target molecule in MTC. This idea may even be supported by the immune system’s recognition of salmon calcitonin, which is being used for the treatment of osteoporosis, leading to calcitonin-specific autoantibodies (Grauer et al. 1993, 1995).

Carcinoembryonic antigen (CEA) may be another potential target molecule in MTC. CEA is a 180 000 glycoprotein member of the Ig supergene family. Several functions have been attributed to CEA, such as cell adhesion and inhibition of cell death induced by the loss of anchorage to the extracellular matrix (Benchimol et al. 1989, Screaton et al. 1997). CEA represents a well-established tumour marker in different human cancer forms, most importantly in gastrointestinal malignancies. Different studies reported on the identification of HLA class I and II-restricted CEA epitopes (Kawashima et al. 1999, Nukaya et al. 1999, Shen et al. 2004) and induction of HLA class I-restricted CEA epitope-specific CTLs (Kim et al. 1998). During the follow-up clinical trials, CEA-positive cancer cases treated with CEA-peptide-pulsed DCs have been reported to demonstrate partial clinical response in some patients (Morse et al. 1999, Nair et al. 1999, Itoh et al. 2002, Liu et al. 2004, Matsuda et al. 2004). Comparable results have also been reported in in vitro and in vivo studies following transfection of DCs with CEA-mRNA (Nair et al. 1999, Eppler et al. 2002). Induction of cytotoxic immunity in a transgenic mouse model was also recently demonstrated (Saha et al. 2004). In MTC, CEA is a well-established tumour marker with higher correlation to tumour mass compared with calcitonin, and may therefore represent a favourable target molecule for vaccination.

Chromogranin A (CgA) may serve as target molecules as well. Chromogranin (secretogranins) constitute a family of water-soluble acidic glyco-proteins stored in secretory vesicles of neuroendocrine tumours containing proteins and peptide hormones (Taupenot et al. 2003). Like CEA, CgA also shows a strong correlation between serum levels and tumour mass; however, false positive values are frequently reported (Bajetta et al. 1999). Antigenic regions of CgA have been demonstrated using monoclonal antibodies (Corti et al. 1996). So far, however, they have not been used in the context of immunotherapy approaches.

Finally, cancer/testis antigens (CTAs) belong to the group of tumour-associated antigens expressed during ontogenesis in a number of solid tumours, but not in normal tissues except the testis. Examples of CTAs are MAGE, GAGE and SSX gene families, BAGE and NY-ESO-1. Most of them are highly immunogenic, eliciting spontaneous immune responses at either cellular level (Jager et al. 1998, 2000) or in association with a strong humoral component (Stockert et al. 1998) in patients with advanced cancer. An in vitro analysis of 23 sporadic MTC cases has revealed that 65% expressed NY-ESO-1, which significantly correlated with tumour recurrence (Maio et al. 2003). NY-ESO-1-specific antibodies could be detected in some cases. It may, therefore, be postulated that CTAs such as NY-ESO-1 may serve as specific target molecule for immunotherapy in MTCs as well.

	DC vaccination trials in MTC

Top Abstract Introduction DC pathways and functional... DCs and immune tolerance In vitro generation of... Maturation of DCs Loading methods in tumour... Route of DC administration Frequency of DC administration DC immunotherapy in non... DC immunotherapy in non-thyroid... DC immunotherapy in MTC Potential tumour antigens in... DC vaccination trials in... Concluding remarks and future... References

 
So far, three clinical trials on autologous DCs have been performed in patients with metastasized MTC; two from our group and another from an Austrian group including the follow-up analysis. The major differences between the studies were the antigens used for immunization. While we used C-cell-specific target molecules such as calcitonin and a CEA-peptide, the Austrian group applied autologous TL for antigen delivery into the DCs. The immunological and clinical results of both approaches will now be compared.

Based on our own promising data of a PTH-specific immune response in one patient with parathyroid carcinoma, polypeptide hormone calcitonin was used for the vaccination of MTC patients (Schott et al. 2001b). A certain CEA-peptide (YLSGANLNL) was also administered to HLA A2-positive patients in order to broaden the antigenic repertoire. This peptide has already been used before in other non-endocrine malignancies resulting in tumour-specific immunity. In our initial study, seven patients were immunized by s.c. injections of 2–5 x 10⁵ DCs loaded either with CEA-peptide and calcitonin (n = 6) or calcitonin only (n = 1) (Schott et al. 2001b). After DC vaccination, all seven patients developed a DTH reaction that immunohistochemistry revealed to be mediated by the infiltration with CD4 + and CD8 + T lymphocytes. In addition, three patients developed significant T-cell proliferation of peripheral blood lymphocytes in response to calcitonin and CEA. Peripheral blood lymphocytes drawn after initiation of treatment responded with high-level IFN- secretion in some patients after stimulation with calcitonin or CEA, whereas the IL-4 production was only slightly increased (Schott et al. 2002). These data indicate the induction of a Th1-dominated cellular immune response against calcitonin and CEA in the majority of patients. Clinical follow-up revealed that three of the seven patients treated developed temporary clinical response with a decrease in calcitonin and CEA serum levels, while three showed stable disease. One patient, who failed to develop T-cell response to either calcitonin or CEA showed further tumour progression. Among the responders, one subject rejected all radiologically detectable liver metastases and developed a dramatic regression of pulmonary metastases (Fig. 3) during the treatment period of 14 months (Schott et al. 2001b).

View larger version (129K): [in this window] [in a new window]   Figure 3 Clinical response to dendritic cell vaccination in medullary thyroid carcinoma. Computed tomography of one patient with metastasized medullary thyroid carcinoma before (left), and 13 months after (right) initiation of dendritic cell vaccination shows complete regression of liver metastases (top) and a significant reduction of pulmonary lesions (bottom). Arrows shows sites of lesions before vaccination (from, Schott M, Seissler J, Lettmann M, Fouxon V, Scherbaum WA & Feldkamp J 2001 Immunotherapy for medullary thyroid carcinoma dendritic cell vaccination. Journal of Clinical Endocrinology and Metabolism 86 4965–4969 ; Copyright 2001, Reprinted with permission from The Endocrine Society).

Parallel to our work, Stift et al.(2003) performed DC trials with autologous TL for antigen delivery. Based on in vitro data with induction of cytotoxic immunity in three MTC patients (Bachleitner-Hofmann et al. 2002), an in vivo trial in patients with solid cancers was initiated. Four of those patients suffered from metastatic MTC (Stift et al. 2003). As described by the authors, a ‘tumour marker response’ was observed. However, most importantly, two patients showed shrinkage in cervical lymph nodes by computed tomography. Then another clinical follow-up study in MTC patients was performed (Stift et al. 2004). In all ten immunized MTC patients, positive immunological responses could be detected as evaluated by in vivo delayed-type hypersensitivity reaction or in vitro intracytoplasmic IFN- detection assay. Three patients showed partial response, one presenting a minor response, and two showed stable disease, whereas the remaining four had progressive disease. Recently, the same group also reported on the establishment of human MTC cell lines, which have been generated from patients. The authors postulate that these tumours may represent a source for the generation of TL for immunization. However, the likely HLA-mismatch needs to be accounted for in future vaccinations before being administered to patients (Pfragner et al. 2005).

In summary, these results clearly demonstrate that autologous DCs are able to induce an antigen-specific Th1-driven immunity in MTC patients. Whether this immune response elicits tumour-specific CTLs needs to be determined in the future. This includes the question of whether the clinical response data reported will result in long-term clinical effects in these patients.

	Concluding remarks and future aspects

Top Abstract Introduction DC pathways and functional... DCs and immune tolerance In vitro generation of... Maturation of DCs Loading methods in tumour... Route of DC administration Frequency of DC administration DC immunotherapy in non... DC immunotherapy in non-thyroid... DC immunotherapy in MTC Potential tumour antigens in... DC vaccination trials in... Concluding remarks and future... References

 
Although the data from the above studies are encouraging, whether or not DC vaccination can provide a significant, long-term clinical benefit in cancer patients remains to be seen. A recently published meta-analysis of vaccination trials reported on an overall clinical response rate of 9.5% in DC immunizations in cancer patients; however, this was two to four times as high as with peptide vaccines or immunization with viral vectors or tumour cells (Rosenberg et al. 2004). To improve the clinical efficacy rate of DC tumour vaccination trials, different points need to be considered. First, standard protocol(s) for DC generation and activation should be developed to improve the reproducibility of the vaccination procedure and allow a comparison of the results from different studies. So far, a multitude of DC generation and activation protocols have been suggested. Because there are still no reports on long-term clinical effects on a larger number of patients, no single method has been generally accepted as a standard technique for DC generation. Secondly, the search for highly immunogenic antigen/peptides should be intensified not only to possibly improve clinical benefit, but also to monitor the immunological response. Our data clearly demonstrate that calcitonin may serve as a specific target molecule in MTC in this context, and HLA class II-restricted epitopes have been identified. Our group will therefore continue to focus research interests on this molecule. Whether other methods of antigen delivery, including pulsing with TL or fusing with autologous tumour cells will result in epitope-specific immunity and in long-term clinical effects needs to be determined as well. Thirdly, future vaccination trials should also include modern techniques that allow quantification and characterization of tumour antigen-specific Th cells and CTLs, including MHC class I or II peptide tetramer staining and ELISPOT analysis from peripheral blood mononuclear cells (Klenerman et al. 2002). This is important, as there is still no defined threshold determining the number of T cells sufficient to induce tumour regression. Future vaccination trials should correlate clinical effects with sophisticated immunological methods in order to define these parameters. In summary, these ex vivo strategies will help to identify the parameters for in vivo targeting of DCs, which should be the next step in the development of clinically effective DC-based vaccination. This is absolutely crucial, as neither conservative nor innovative therapy approaches have yet been established in most endocrine malignancies, e.g. in metastatic MTC.

	Acknowledgements

 
This work was supported by the American Thyroid Association (ThyCa) and by the Forschungskommission of the Heinrich-Heine-University Duesseldorf. The author declares that there is no conflict of interest that would prejudice the impartiality of this scientific work.

	References

Top Abstract Introduction DC pathways and functional... DCs and immune tolerance In vitro generation of... Maturation of DCs Loading methods in tumour... Route of DC administration Frequency of DC administration DC immunotherapy in non... DC immunotherapy in non-thyroid... DC immunotherapy in MTC Potential tumour antigens in... DC vaccination trials in... Concluding remarks and future... References

 
Albert ML, Sauter B & Bhardwaj N 1998 Dendritic cells acquire antigen from apoptotic cells and induce class I-restricted CTLs. Nature 392 86–89.[CrossRef][Medline]

Avigan D, Vasir B, Gong J, Borges V, Wu Z, Uhl L, Atkins M, Mier J, McDermott D, Smith T et al. 2004 Fusion cell vaccination of patients with metastatic breast and renal cancer induces immunological and clinical responses. Clinical Cancer Research 10 4699–4708.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Bachleitner-Hofmann T, Stift A, Friedl J, Pfragner R, Radelbauer K, Dubsky P, Schuller G, Benko T, Niederle B, Brostjan C et al. 2002 Stimulation of autologous antitumor T-cell responses against medullary thyroid carcinoma using tumor lysate-pulsed dendritic cells. Journal of Clinical Endocrinology and Metabolism 87 1098–1104.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Bajetta E, Ferrari L, Martinetti A, Celio L, Procopio G, Artale S, Zilembo N, Di Bartolomeo M, Seregni E & Bombardieri E 1999 Chromogranin A, neuron specific enolase, carcino-embryonic antigen, and hydroxyindole acetic acid evaluation in patients with neuroendocrine tumors. Cancer 86 858–865.[CrossRef][Medline]

Banchereau J & Palucka AK 2005 Dendritic cells as therapeutic vaccines against cancer. Nature Reviews of Immunology 5 296–306.

Banchereau J, Briere F, Caux C, Davoust J, Lebecque S, Liu YJ, Pulendran B & Palucka K 2000 Immunobiology of dendritic cells. Annual Review of Immunology 18 767–811.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]

Banchereau J, Palucka AK, Dhodapkar M, Burkeholder S, Taquet N, Rolland A, TaquetS, CoqueryS, Wittkowski KM, Bhardwaj N et al. 2001 Immune and clinical responses in patients with metastatic melanoma to CD34( + ) progenitor-derived dendritic cell vaccine. Cancer Research 61 6451–6458.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Benchimol S, Fuks A, Jothy S, Beauchemin N, Shirota K & Stanners CP 1989 Carcinoembryonic antigen, a human tumor marker, functions as an intercellular adhesion molecule. Cell 57 327–334.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]

Berard F, Blanco P, Davoust J, Neidhart-Berard EM, Nouri-Shirazi M, Taquet N, Rimoldi D, Cerottini JC, Banchereau J & Palucka AK 2000 Cross-priming of naive CD8 T cells against melanoma antigens using dendritic cells loaded with killed allogeneic melanoma cells. Journal of Experimental Medicine 192 1535–1544.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Berger TG, Haendle I, Schrama D, Luftl M, Bauer N, Pedersen LO, Schuler-Thurner B, Hohenberger W, Straten PP, Schuler G et al. 2004 Circulation and homing of melanoma-reactive T cells to both cutaneous and visceral metastases after vaccination with monocyte-derived dendritic cells. International Journal of Cancer 111 229–237.[CrossRef][Medline]

Betea D, Bradwell AR, Harvey TC, Mead GP, Schmidt-Gayk H, Ghaye B, Daly AF & Beckers A 2004 Hormonal and biochemical normalization and tumor shrinkage induced by anti-parathyroid hormone immunotherapy in a patient with metastatic parathyroid carcinoma. Journal of Clinical Endocrinology and Metabolism 89 3413–3420.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Blanco P, Palucka AK, Gill M, Pascual V & Banchereau J 2001 Induction of dendritic cell differentiation by IFN-alpha in systemic lupus erythematosus. Science 294 1540–1543.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Bradwell AR & Harvey TC 1999 Control of hypercalcaemia of parathyroid carcinoma by immunisation. Lancet 353 370–373.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]

Brocker T 1999 The role of dendritic cells in T cell selection and survival. Journal of Leukocyte Biology 66 331–335.[Abstract]

Caux C, Vanbervliet B, Massacrier C, Dezutter-Dambuyant C, Saint-Vis B, Jacquet C, Yoneda K, Imamura S, Schmitt D & Banchereau J 1996 CD34 + hematopoietic progenitors from human cord blood differentiate along two independent dendritic cell pathways in response to GM-CSF + TNF alpha. Journal of Experimental Medicine 184 695–706.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Caux C, Massacrier C, Vanbervliet B, Dubois B, Durand I, Cella M, Lanzavecchia A & Banchereau J 1997 CD34 + hematopoietic progenitors from human cord blood differentiate along two independent dendritic cell pathways in response to granulocyte-macrophage colony-stimulating factor plus tumor necrosis factor alpha: II. Functional analysis. Blood 90 1458–1470.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Cella M, Jarrossay D, Facchetti F, Alebardi O, Nakajima H, Lanzavecchia A & Colonna M 1999 Plasmacytoid monocytes migrate to inflamed lymph nodes and produce large amounts of type I interferon. Nature Medicine 5 919–923.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]

Chan CW, Crafton E, Fan HN, Flook J, Yoshimura K, Skarica M, Brockstedt D, Dubensky TW, Stins MF, Lanier LL et al. 2006 Interferon-producing killer dendritic cells provide a link between innate and adaptive immunity. Nature Medicine 12 207–213.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]

Chen Y, Hu D, Eling DJ, Robbins J & Kipps TJ 1998 DNA vaccines encoding full-length or truncated Neu induce protective immunity against Neu-expressing mammary tumors. Cancer Research 58 1965–1971.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Chomarat P, Dantin C, Bennett L, Banchereau J & Palucka AK 2003 TNF skews monocyte differentiation from macrophages to dendritic cells. Journal of Immunology 171 2262–2269.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Chow YH, Huang WL, Chi WK, Chu YD & Tao MH 1997 Improvement of hepatitis B virus DNA vaccines by plasmids coexpressing hepatitis B surface antigen and interleukin-2. Journal of Virology 71 169–178.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Chow YH, Chiang BL, Lee YL, Chi WK, Lin WC, Chen YT & Tao MH 1998 Development of Th1 and Th2 populations and the nature of immune responses to hepatitis B virus DNA vaccines can be modulated by codelivery of various cytokine genes. Journal of Immunology 160 1320–1329.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Corti A, Longhi R, Gasparri A, Chen F, Pelagi M & Siccardi AG 1996 Antigenic regions of human chromogranin A and their topographic relationships with structural/functional domains. European Journal of Biochemistry 235 275–280.[Web of Science][Medline]

Dhodapkar MV, Steinman RM, Krasovsky J, Munz C & Bhardwaj N 2001 Antigen-specific inhibition of effector T cell function in humans after injection of immature dendritic cells. Journal of Experimental Medicine 193 233–238.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Eppler E, Horig H, Kaufman HL, Groscurth P & Filgueira L 2002 Carcinoembryonic antigen (CEA) presentation and specific T cell-priming by human dendritic cells transfected with CEA-mRNA. European Journal of Cancer 38 184–193.

Fay JW, Palucka AK, Paczesny S, Dhodapkar M, Johnston DA, Burkeholder S, Ueno H & Banchereau J 2005 Long-term outcomes in patients with metastatic melanoma vaccinated with melanoma peptide-pulsed CD34( + ) progenitor-derived dendritic cells. Cancer Immunology and Immunotherapy 1–10.

Fernandez NC, Lozier A, Flament C, Ricciardi-Castagnoli P, Bellet D, Suter M, Perricaudet M, Tursz T, Maraskovsky E & Zitvogel L 1999 Dendritic cells directly trigger NK cell functions: cross-talk relevant in innate anti-tumor immune responses in vivo. Nature Medicine 5 405–411.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]

Figdor CG, de Vries IJ, Lesterhuis WJ & Melief CJ 2004 Dendritic cell immunotherapy: mapping the way. Nature Medicine 10 475–480.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]

Fong L, Brockstedt D, Benike C, Breen JK, Strang G, Ruegg CL & Engleman EG 2001a Dendritic cell-based xenoantigen vaccination for prostate cancer immunotherapy. Journal of Immunology 167 7150–7156.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Fong L, Brockstedt D, Benike C, Wu L & Engleman EG 2001b Dendritic cells injected via different routes induce immunity in cancer patients. Journal of Immunology 166 4254–4259.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Fong L, Hou Y, Rivas A, Benike C, Yuen A, Fisher GA, Davis MM & Engleman EG 2001c Altered peptide ligand vaccination with Flt3 ligand expanded dendritic cells for tumor immunotherapy. PNAS 98 8809–8814.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Gilboa E 1999 The makings of a tumor rejection antigen. Immunity 11 263–270.[CrossRef][Medline]

Gong J, Chen D, Kashiwaba M & Kufe D 1997 Induction of antitumor activity by immunization with fusions of dendritic and carcinoma cells. Nature Medicine 3 558–561.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]

Gong J, Chen D, Kashiwaba M, Li Y, Chen L, Takeuchi H, Qu H, Rowse GJ, Gendler SJ & Kufe D 1998 Reversal of tolerance to human MUC1 antigen in MUC1 transgenic mice immunized with fusions of dendritic and carcinoma cells. PNAS 95 6279–6283.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Gong J, Avigan D, Chen D, Wu Z, Koido S, Kashiwaba M & Kufe D 2000 Activation of antitumor cytotoxic T lymphocytes by fusions of human dendritic cells and breast carcinoma cells. PNAS 97 2715–2718.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Gong J, Koido S, Chen D, Tanaka Y, Huang L, Avigan D, Anderson K, Ohno T & Kufe D 2002 Immunization against murine multiple myeloma with fusions of dendritic and plasmacytoma cells is potentiated by interleukin 12. Blood 99 2512–2517.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Grauer A, Reinel HH, Ziegler R & Raue F 1993 Neutralizing antibodies against calcitonin. Hormone Metabolic Research 25 486–488.

Grauer A, Ziegler R & Raue F 1995 Clinical significance of antibodies against calcitonin. Experimental and Clinical Endocrinology and Diabetes 103 345–351.

Haupt K, Siegel F, Lu M, Yang D, Hilken G, Mann K, Roggendorf M & Saller B 2001 Induction of a cellular and humoral immune response against preprocalcitonin by genetic immunization: a potential new treatment for medullary thyroid carcinoma. Endocrinology 142 1017–1023.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Heiser A, Coleman D, Dannull J, Yancey D, Maurice MA, Lallas CD, Dahm P, Niedzwiecki D, Gilboa E & Vieweg J 2002 Autologous dendritic cells transfected with prostate-specific antigen RNA stimulate CTL responses against metastatic prostate tumors. Journal of Clinical Investigation 109 409–417.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]

Holtl L, Rieser C, Papesh C, Ramoner R, Bartsch G & Thurnher M 1998 CD83 + blood dendritic cells as a vaccine for immunotherapy of metastatic renal-cell cancer (letter). Lancet 352 1358.[Medline]

Holtl L, Zelle-Rieser C, Gander H, Papesh C, Ramoner R, Bartsch G, Rogatsch H, Barsoum AL, Coggin JH, Jr & Thurnher M 2002 Immunotherapy of metastatic renal cell carcinoma with tumor lysate-pulsed autologous dendritic cells. Clinical Cancer Research 8 3369–3376.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Hsu FJ, Benike C, Fagnoni F, Liles TM, Czerwinski D, Taidi B, Engleman EG & Levy R 1996 Vaccination of patients with B-cell lymphoma using autologous antigen-pulsed dendritic cells. Nature Medicine 2 52–58.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]

Itoh T, Ueda Y, Kawashima I, Nukaya I, Fujiwara H, Fuji N, Yamashita T, Yoshimura T, Okugawa K, Iwasaki T et al. 2002 Immunotherapy of solid cancer using dendritic cells pulsed with the HLA-A24-restricted peptide of carcinoembryonic antigen. Cancer Immunology and Immunotherapy 51 99–106.

Jager E, Chen YT, Drijfhout JW, Karbach J, Ringhoffer M, Jager D, Arand M, Wada H, Noguchi Y, Stockert E et al. 1998 Simultaneous humoral and cellular immune response against cancer-testis antigen NY-ESO-1: definition of human histocompatibility leukocyte antigen (HLA)-A2-binding peptide epitopes. Journal of Experimental Medicine 187 265–270.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Jager E, Nagata Y, Gnjatic S, Wada H, Stockert E, Karbach J, Dunbar PR, Lee SY, Jungbluth A, Jager D et al. 2000 Monitoring CD8 T cell responses to NY-ESO-1: correlation of humoral and cellular immune responses. PNAS 97 4760–4765.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Jego G, Palucka AK, Blanck JP, Chalouni C, Pascual V & Banchereau J 2003 Plasmacytoid dendritic cells induce plasma cell differentiation through type I interferon and interleukin 6. Immunity 19 225–234.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]

Jonuleit H, Kuhn U, Muller G, Steinbrink K, Paragnik L, Schmitt E, Knop J & Enk AH 1997 Pro-inflammatory cytokines and prostaglandins induce maturation of potent immunostimulatory dendritic cells under fetal calf serum-free conditions. European Journal of Immunology 27 3135–3142.[Web of Science][Medline]

Jonuleit H, Schmitt E, Schuler G, Knop J & Enk AH 2000 Induction of interleukin 10-producing, nonproli-ferating CD4( + ) T cells with regulatory properties by repetitive stimulation with allogeneic immature human dendritic cells. Journal of Experimental Medicine 192 1213–1222.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Jonuleit H, Giesecke-Tuettenberg A, Tuting T, Thurner-Schuler B, Stuge TB, Paragnik L, Kandemir A, Lee PP, Schuler G, Knop J et al. 2001 A comparison of two types of dendritic cell as adjuvants for the induction of melanoma-specific T-cell responses in humans following intranodal injection. International Journal of Cancer 93 243–251.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]

Kadowaki N, Antonenko S, Ho S, Rissoan MC, Soumelis V, Porcelli SA, Lanier LL & Liu YJ 2001 Distinct cytokine profiles of neonatal natural killer T cells after expansion with subsets of dendritic cells. Journal of Experimental Medicine 193 1221–1226.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Kaech SM, Wherry EJ & Ahmed R 2002 Effector and memory T-cell differentiation: implications for vaccine development. Nature Reviews Immunology 2 251–262.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]

Kawashima I, Tsai V, Southwood S, Takesako K, Sette A & Celis E 1999 Identification of HLA-A3-restricted cyto-toxic T lymphocyte epitopes from carcinoembryonic antigen and HER-2/neu by primary in vitro immunization with peptide-pulsed dendritic cells. Cancer Research 59 431–435.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Kebebew E, Ituarte PH, Siperstein AE, Duh QY & Clark OH 2000 Medullary thyroid carcinoma: clinical characteristics, treatment, prognostic factors, and a comparison of staging systems. Cancer 88 1139–1148.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]

Kim C, Matsumura M, Saijo K & Ohno T 1998 In vitro induction of HLA-A2402-restricted and carcinoembryo-nic-antigen-specific cytotoxic T lymphocytes on fixed autologous peripheral blood cells. Cancer Immunology Immunotherapy 47 90–96.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]

Kimura K, Kawamura T, Kadotani S, Inada H, Niihira S & Yamano T 2001 Peptide-specific cytotoxicity of T lymphocytes against glutamic acid decarboxylase and insulin in type 1 diabetes mellitus. Diabetes Research Clinical Practice 51 173–179.

Klenerman P, Cerundolo V & Dunbar PR 2002 Tracking T cells with tetramers: new tales from new tools. Nature Reviews Immunology 2 263–272.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]

Liu KJ, Wang CC, Chen LT, Cheng AL, Lin DT, Wu YC, Yu WL, Hung YM, Yang HY, Juang SH et al. 2004 Generation of carcinoembryonic antigen (CEA)-specific T-cell responses in HLA-A*0201 and HLA-A*2402 late-stage colorectal cancer patients after vaccination with dendritic cells loaded with CEA peptides. Clinical Cancer Research 10 2645–2651.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Luft T, Pang KC, Thomas E, Hertzog P, Hart DN, Trapani J & Cebon J 1998 Type I IFNs enhance the terminal differentiation of dendritic cells. Journal of Immunology 161 1947–1953.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Ma H, Ke Y, Li Q & Kapp JA 2000 Bovine and human insulin activate CD8 + -autoreactive CTL expressing both type 1 and type 2 cytokines in C57BL/6 mice. Journal of Immunology 164 86–92.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Macatonia SE, Hsieh CS, Murphy KM & O’Garra A 1993 Dendritic cells and macrophages are required for Th1 development of CD4 + T cells from alpha beta TCR transgenic mice: IL-12 substitution for macrophages to stimulate IFN-gamma production is IFN-gamma-dependent. International Immunology 5 1119–1128.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Mailliard RB, Wankowicz-Kalinska A, Cai Q, Wesa A, Hilkens CM, Kapsenberg ML, Kirkwood JM, Storkus WJ & Kalinski P 2004 alpha-type-1 polarized dendritic cells: a novel immunization tool with optimized CTL-inducing activity. Cancer Research 64 5934–5937.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Maio M, Coral S, Sigalotti L, Elisei R, Romei C, Rossi G, Cortini E, Colizzi F, Fenzi G, Altomonte M et al. 2003 Analysis of cancer/testis antigens in sporadic medullary thyroid carcinoma: expression and humoral response to NY-ESO-1. Journal of Clinical Endocrinology and Metabolism 88 748–754.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Maldonado-Lopez R, De Smedt T, Michel P, Godfroid J, Pajak B, Heirman C, Thielemans K, Leo O, Urbain J & Moser M 1999 CD8alpha + and CD8alpha- subclasses of dendritic cells direct the development of distinct T helper cells in vivo. Journal of Experimental Medicine 189 587–592.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Masopust D, Vezys V, Marzo AL & Lefrancois L 2001 Preferential localization of effector memory cells in nonlymphoid tissue. Science 291 2413–2417.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Matsuda K, Tsunoda T, Tanaka H, Umano Y, Tanimura H, Nukaya I, Takesako K & Yamaue H 2004 Enhancement of cytotoxic T-lymphocyte responses in patients with gastrointestinal malignancies following vaccination with CEA peptide-pulsed dendritic cells. Cancer Immunology and Immunotherapy 53 609–616.

Mohamadzadeh M, Berard F, Essert G, Chalouni C, Pulendran B, Davoust J, Bridges G, Palucka AK & Banchereau J 2001 Interleukin 15 skews monocyte differentiation into dendritic cells with features of Langerhans cells. Journal of Experimental Medicine 194 1013–1020.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Mora JR, Bono MR, Manjunath N, Weninger W, Cavanagh LL, Rosemblatt M & von Andrian UH 2003 Selective imprinting of gut-homing T cells by Peyer’s patch dendritic cells. Nature 424 88–93.[CrossRef][Medline]

Morse MA, Deng Y, Coleman D, Hull S, Kitrell-Fisher E, Nair S, Schlom J, Ryback ME & Lyerly HK 1999 A Phase I study of active immunotherapy with carcinoembryonic antigen peptide (CAP-1)-pulsed, autologous human cultured dendritic cells in patients with metastatic malignancies expressing carcinoembryonic antigen. Clinical Cancer Research 5 1331–1338.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Mullins DW, Sheasley SL, Ream RM, Bullock TN, Fu YX & Engelhard VH 2003 Route of immunization with peptide-pulsed dendritic cells controls the distribution of memory and effector T cells in lymphoid tissues and determines the pattern of regional tumor control. Journal of Experimental Medicine 198 1023–1034.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Murphy GP, Tjoa BA, Simmons SJ, Rogers MK, Kenny GM & Jarisch J 2000 Higher-dose and less frequent dendritic cell infusions with PSMA peptides in hormone-refractory metastatic prostate cancer patients. Prostate 43 59–62.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]

Nair SK, Hull S, Coleman D, Gilboa E, Lyerly HK & Morse MA 1999 Induction of carcinoembryonic antigen (CEA)-specific cytotoxic T-lymphocyte responses in vitro using autologous dendritic cells loaded with CEA peptide or CEA RNA in patients with metastatic malignancies expressing CEA. International Journal of Cancer 82 121–124.[CrossRef][Medline]

Nakayama M, Abiru N, Moriyama H, Babaya N, Liu E, Miao D, Yu L, Wegmann DR, Hutton JC, Elliott JF et al. 2005 Prime role for an insulin epitope in the development of type 1 diabetes in NOD mice. Nature 435 220–223.[CrossRef][Medline]

Neidhardt-Berard EM, Berard F, Banchereau J & Palucka AK 2004 Dendritic cells loaded with killed breast cancer cells induce differentiation of tumor-specific cytotoxic T lymphocytes. Breast Cancer Research 6 R322–R328.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]

Nestle FO, Alijagic S, Gilliet M, Sun Y, Grabbe S, Dummer R, Burg G & Schadendorf D 1998 Vaccination of melanoma patients with peptide or tumor lysate-pulsed dendritic cells. Nature Medicine 4 328–332.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]

Nukaya I, Yasumoto M, Iwasaki T, Ideno M, Sette A, Celis E, Takesako K & Kato I 1999 Identification of HLA-A24 epitope peptides of carcinoembryonic antigen which induce tumor-reactive cytotoxic T lymphocyte. International Journal of Cancer 80 92–97.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]

Paczesny S, Banchereau J, Wittkowski KM, Saracino G, Fay J & Palucka AK 2004 Expansion of melanoma-specific cytolytic CD8 + T cell precursors in patients with metastatic melanoma vaccinated with CD34 + progenitor-derived dendritic cells. Journal of Experimental Medicine 199 1503–1511.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Papewalis C, Fassnacht M, Willenberg H, Domberg J, Schinner S, Bornstein S, Scherbaum WA & Schott M 2006 Dendritic cells as potential adjuvant for immunotherapy in adrenocortical carcinoma. Clinical Endocrinology 65 215–222.[CrossRef][Medline]

Paquette RL, Hsu NC, Kiertscher SM, Park AN, Tran L, Roth MD & Glaspy JA 1998 Interferon-alpha and granulocyte-macrophage colony-stimulating factor differentiate peripheral blood monocytes into potent antigen-presenting cells. Journal of Leukocyte Biology 64 358–367.[Abstract]

Parkhurst MR, Salgaller ML, Southwood S, Robbins PF, Sette A, Rosenberg SA & Kawakami Y 1996 Improved induction of melanoma-reactive CTL with peptides from the melanoma antigen gp100 modified at HLA-A*0201-binding residues. Journal of Immunology 157 2539–2548.[Abstract]

Parlato S, Santini SM, Lapenta C, Di Pucchio T, Logozzi M, Spada M, Giammarioli AM, Malorni W, Fais S & Belardelli F 2001 Expression of CCR-7, MIP-3beta, and Th-1 chemokines in type I IFN- induced monocyte-derived dendritic cells: importance for the rapid acquisition of potent migratory and functional activities. Blood 98 3022–3029.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Perambakam S, Hallmeyer S, Reddy S, Mahmud N, Bressler L, Dechristopher P, Mahmud D, Nunez R, Sosman JA & Peace DJ 2006 Induction of specific T cell immunity in patients with prostate cancer by vaccination with PSA146-154 peptide. Cancer Immunology and Immunotherapy 55 1033–1042.[CrossRef]

Peters JH, Xu H, Ruppert J, Ostermeier D, Friedrichs D & Gieseler RK 1993 Signals required for differentiating dendritic cells from human monocytes in vitro. Advances in Experimental Medicine and Biology 329 275–280.[Medline]

Pfragner R, Skofitsch G, Hoger H, Jech M, Rinner B, Siegl V, Niederle B, Gnant M, Friedl J & Stift A 2005 Medullary thyroid carcinoma: autologous tumor cell lines for dendritic cell vaccination. Anticancer Research 25 4225–4230.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Pulendran B, Smith JL, Caspary G, Brasel K, Pettit D, Maraskovsky E & Maliszewski CR 1999 Distinct dendritic cell subsets differentially regulate the class of immune response in vivo. PNAS 96 1036–1041.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Reis e Sousa C 2001 Dendritic cells as sensors of infection. Immunity 14 495–498.[CrossRef][Medline]

Rissoan MC, Soumelis V, Kadowaki N, Grouard G, Briere F, de Waal MR & Liu YJ 1999 Reciprocal control of T helper cell and dendritic cell differentiation. Science 283 1183–1186.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Romani N, Gruner S, Brang D, Kampgen E, Lenz A, Trockenbacher B, Konwalinka G, Fritsch PO, Steinman RM & Schuler G 1994 Proliferating dendritic cell progenitors in human blood. Journal of Experimental Medicine 180 83–93.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Rosenberg SA, Yang JC & Restifo NP 2004 Cancer immunotherapy: moving beyond current vaccines. Nature Medicine 10 909–915.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]

Saha A, Chatterjee SK, Foon KA, Primus FJ, Sreedharan S, Mohanty K & Bhattacharya-Chatterjee M 2004 Dendritic cells pulsed with an anti-idiotype antibody mimicking carcinoembryonic antigen (CEA) can reverse immunological tolerance to CEA and induce antitumor immunity in CEA transgenic mice. Cancer Research 64 4995–5003.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Salgaller ML, Marincola FM, Cormier JN & Rosenberg SA 1996 Immunization against epitopes in the human melanoma antigen gp100 following patient immunization with synthetic peptides. Cancer Research 56 4749–4757.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Sallusto F & Lanzavecchia A 1994 Efficient presentation of soluble antigen by cultured human dendritic cells is maintained by granulocyte/macrophage colony-stimulating factor plus interleukin 4 and downregulated by tumor necrosis factor alpha. Journal of Experimental Medicine 179 1109–1118.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Santini SM, Lapenta C, Logozzi M, Parlato S, Spada M, Di Pucchio T & Belardelli F 2000 Type I interferon as a powerful adjuvant for monocyte-derived dendritic cell development and activity in vitro and in Hu-PBL-SCID mice. Journal of Experimental Medicine 191 1777–1788.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Schott M, Feldkamp J, Schattenberg D, Seissler J & Scherbaum WA 1999 Dendritic cell immunotherapy in disseminated parathyroid carcinoma (letter). Lancet 353 1188–1189.[Web of Science][Medline]

Schott M, Feldkamp J, Schattenberg D, Krueger T, Dotzenrath C, Seissler J & Scherbaum WA 2000 Induction of cellular immunity in a parathyroid carcinoma treated with tumor lysate-pulsed dendritic cells. European Journal of Endocrinology 142 300–306.[Abstract]

Schott M, Feldkamp J, Lettmann M, Simon D, Scherbaum WA & Seissler J 2001a Dendritic cell immunotherapy in a neuroendocrine pancreas carcinoma. Clinical Endocrinology 55 271–277.[CrossRef][Medline]

Schott M, Seissler J, Lettmann M, Fouxon V, Scherbaum WA & Feldkamp J 2001b Immunotherapy for medullary thyroid carcinoma by dendritic cell vaccination. Journal of Clinical Endocrinology and Metabolism 86 4965–4969.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Schott M, Feldkamp J, Klucken M, Kobbe G, Scherbaum WA & Seissler J 2002 Calcitonin-specific antitumor immunity in medullary thyroid carcinoma following dendritic cell vaccination. Cancer Immunology and Immunotherapy 51 663–668.[CrossRef]

Schuler-Thurner B, Schultz ES, Berger TG, Weinlich G, Ebner S, Woerl P, Bender A, Feuerstein B, Fritsch PO, Romani N et al. 2002 Rapid induction of tumor-specific type 1 T helper cells in metastatic melanoma patients by vaccination with mature, cryopreserved, peptide-loaded monocyte-derived dendritic cells. Journal of Experimental Medicine 195 1279–1288.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Screaton RA, Penn LZ & Stanners CP 1997 Carcinoembryonic antigen, a human tumor marker, cooperates with Myc and Bcl-2 in cellular transformation. Journal of Cell Biology 137 939–952.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Shen L, Schroers R, Hammer J, Huang XF & Chen SY 2004 Identification of a MHC class-II restricted epitope in carcinoembryonic antigen. Cancer Immunology and Immunotherapy 53 391–403.

Shortman K & Liu YJ 2002 Mouse and human dendritic cell subtypes. Nature Reviews Immunology 2 151–161.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]

Siegal FP, Kadowaki N, Shodell M, Fitzgerald-Bocarsly PA, Shah K, Ho S, Antonenko S & Liu YJ 1999 The nature of the principal type 1 interferon-producing cells in human blood. Science 284 1835–1837.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Small EJ, Fratesi P, Reese DM, Strang G, Laus R, Peshwa MV & Valone FH 2000 Immunotherapy of hormone-refractory prostate cancer with antigen-loaded dendritic cells. Journal of Clinical Oncology 18 3894–3903.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Steinman RM 1991 The dendritic cell system and its role in immunogenicity. Annual Review of Immunology 9 271–296.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]

Steinman RM & Cohn ZA 1973 Identification of a novel cell type in peripheral lymphoid organs of mice. I. Morphology, quantitation, tissue distribution. Journal of Experimental Medicine 137 1142–1162.[Abstract]

Steinman RM, Hawiger D & Nussenzweig MC 2003 Tolerogenic dendritic cells. Annual Review of Immunology 21 685–711.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]

Stift A, Friedl J, Dubsky P, Bachleitner-Hofmann T, Schueller G, Zontsich T, Benkoe T, Radelbauer K, Brostjan C, Jakesz R et al. 2003 Dendritic cell-based vaccination in solid cancer. Journal of Clinical Oncology 21 135–142.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Stift A, Sachet M, Yagubian R, Bittermann C, Dubsky P, Brostjan C, Pfragner R, Niederle B, Jakesz R, Gnant M et al. 2004 Dendritic cell vaccination in medullary thyroid carcinoma. Clinical Cancer Research 10 2944–2953.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Stockert E, Jager E, Chen YT, Scanlan MJ, Gout I, Karbach J, Arand M, Knuth A & Old LJ 1998 A survey of the humoral immune response of cancer patients to a panel of human tumor antigens. Journal of Experimental Medicine 187 1349–1354.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Stuge TB, Holmes SP, Saharan S, Tuettenberg A, Roederer M, Weber JS & Lee PP 2004 Diversity and recognition efficiency of T cell responses to cancer. PLoS Medicine 1 e28.

Taieb J, Chaput N, Menard C, Apetoh L, Ullrich E, Bonmort M, Pequignot M, Casares N, Terme M, Flament C et al. 2006 A novel dendritic cell subset involved in tumor immunosurveillance. Nature Medicine 12 214–219.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]

Taupenot L, Harper KL & O’Connor DT 2003 The chromogranin-secretogranin family. New England Journal of Medicine 348 1134–1149.[Free Full Text]

Thurner B, Haendle I, Roder C, Dieckmann D, Keikavoussi P, Jonuleit H, Bender A, Maczek C, Schreiner D, von den Driesch P et al. 1999 Vaccination with mage-3A1 peptide-pulsed mature, monocyte-derived dendritic cells expands specific cytotoxic T cells and induces regression of some metastases in advanced stage IV melanoma. Journal of Experimental Medicine 190 1669–1678.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Timmerman JM, Czerwinski DK, Davis TA, Hsu FJ, Benike C, Hao ZM, Taidi B, Rajapaksa R, Caspar CB, Okada CY et al. 2002 Idiotype-pulsed dendritic cell vaccination for B-cell lymphoma: clinical and immune responses in 35 patients. Blood 99 1517–1526.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Tjoa BA, Simmons SJ, Bowes VA, Ragde H, Rogers M, Elgamal A, Kenny GM, Cobb OE, Ireton RC, Troychak MJ et al. 1998 Evaluation of phase I/II clinical trials in prostate cancer with dendritic cells and PSMA peptides. Prostate 36 39–44.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]

Tjoa BA, Simmons SJ, Elgamal A, Rogers M, Ragde H, Kenny GM, Troychak MJ, Boynton AL & Murphy GP 1999 Follow-up evaluation of a phase II prostate cancer vaccine trial. Prostate 40 125–129.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]

Tosi D, Valenti R, Cova A, Sovena G, Huber V, Pilla L, Arienti F, Belardelli F, Parmiani G & Rivoltini L 2004 Role of cross-talk between IFN-alpha-induced monocyte-derived dendritic cells and NK cells in priming CD8 + T cell responses against human tumor antigens. Journal of Immunology 172 5363–5370.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Van Tendeloo VF, Ponsaerts P, Lardon F, Nijs G, Lenjou M, Van Broeckhoven C, Van Bockstaele DR & Berneman ZN 2001 Highly efficient gene delivery by mRNA electroporation in human hematopoietic cells: superiority to lipofection and passive pulsing of mRNA and to electroporation of plasmid cDNA for tumor antigen loading of dendritic cells. Blood 98 49–56.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

de Vries IJ, Bernsen MR, Lesterhuis WJ, Scharenborg NM, Strijk SP, Gerritsen MJ, Ruiter DJ, Figdor CG, Punt CJ & Adema GJ 2005 Immunomonitoring tumor-specific T cells in delayed-type hypersensitivity skin biopsies after dendritic cell vaccination correlates with clinical outcome. Journal of Clinical Oncology 23 5779–5787.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Wang RF, Wang X, Atwood AC, Topalian SL & Rosenberg SA 1999 Cloning genes encoding MHC class II-restricted antigens: mutated CDC27 as a tumor antigen. Science 284 1351–1354.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Yamazaki S, Iyoda T, Tarbell K, Olson K, Velinzon K, Inaba K & Steinman RM 2003 Direct expansion of functional CD25 + CD4 + regulatory T cells by antigen-processing dendritic cells. Journal of Experimental Medicine 198 235–247.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Yu JS, Wheeler CJ, Zeltzer PM, Ying H, Finger DN, Lee PK, Yong WH, Incardona F, Thompson RC, Riedinger MS et al. 2001 Vaccination of malignant glioma patients with peptide-pulsed dendritic cells elicits systemic cytotoxicity and intracranial T-cell infiltration. Cancer Research 61 842–847.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Zhang R & DeGroot LJ 1997 A monoclonal antibody against rat calcitonin inhibits the growth of a rat medullary thyroid carcinoma cell line in vitro. Endocrinology 138 1697–1703.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Zhang R, Scherberg N & DeGroot LJ 1997 Monoclonal antibodies to rat calcitonin: their use in antigenic mapping and immunohistochemistry. Endocrinology 138 1691–1696.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Zinkernagel RM 2003 On natural and artificial vaccinations. Annual Review of Immunology 21 515–546.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]

This article has been cited by other articles:

				M. Wuttke, C. Papewalis, Y. Meyer, C. Kessler, B. Jacobs, H. S. Willenberg, S. Schinner, C. Kouatchoua, T. Baehring, W. A. Scherbaum, et al. Amino Acid-Modified Calcitonin Immunization Induces Tumor Epitope-Specific Immunity in a Transgenic Mouse Model for Medullary Thyroid Carcinoma Endocrinology, November 1, 2008; 149(11): 5627 - 5634. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

This Article Abstract Full Text (PDF) Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Services Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in Web of Science Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Download to citation manager Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Web of Science (12) Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Schott, M. Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by Schott, M.