|
|
||||||||
REVIEW |
1 Breast Cancer Program, Sidney Kimmel Comprehensive Cancer Center at Johns Hopkins, 1650 Orleans Street, Room 410 CRB, Baltimore, MD 21231-1000, USA
2 Graduate Program in Pathobiology, Department of Pathology, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD 21231, USA
(Requests for offprints should be addressed to S Sukumar at first address; Email: saras{at}jhmi.edu)
| Abstract |
|---|
|
|
|---|
| Obesity and breast cancer |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Obesity is a known risk factor for breast cancer. It is generally accepted that obese women have an increased risk for postmenopausal, but not pre-menopausal, breast cancer (Lahmann et al. 2004, van den Brandt et al. 2000). A recent study examined overweight, obesity, and mortality from cancer in 495 477 US women over a 16-year period, and found that obese women in the highest quintile of body mass index (BMI) had double the death rate (relative risk, 2.12) from breast cancer when compared with women in the lowest quintile of BMI (Calle et al. 2003). Obese breast cancer patients appear to have a higher risk for lymph node metastasis, large tumors, and death when compared with non-obese breast cancer patients (Berclaz et al. 2004, Calle et al. 2003).
Compared with some other risk factors for breast cancer such as germline mutations in BRCA1 (relative risk, 2.00) or diagnosed carcinoma in situ (relative risk, ~16), the risk from obesity (relative risk, 1.12.5) is minor. However, there is some evidence to suggest that, in women with a family history of breast cancer, obesity significantly increases the risk of developing breast cancer compared with slimmer women with a positive family history (Carpenter et al. 2003). The physiological mechanism by which these two risk factors interact to promote tumorigenesis is not understood. However, the weight of the evidence in the literature supports the statement that in women with a positive family history of breast cancer the maintenance of a lean body mass could reduce the risk of developing postmenopausal breast cancer.
The prevalence of obesity in the USA and in the world has reached epidemic proportions. Overweight and obesity are defined by the World Health Organisation as a BMI of
25 and
30 kg/m2 , respectively. Normal values of fat mass are 918% of the body in males and 1428% in females, but it may be as much as 6070% in morbidly obese individuals. Given the worldwide epidemic of overweight and obesity, it is critical to understand the physiological impact of obesity on cancer development and progression.
| Current hypotheses for correlation between obesity and breast cancer |
|---|
|
|
|---|
A newer hypothesis places adipocytes and their autocrine, paracrine, and endocrine functions at center stage. This hypothesis sets forth that obesity should be considered an endocrine tumor (Dizdar & Alyamac 2004). Adipocytes, once thought of as exclusively energy-storing cells, are dynamic endocrine cells and secrete various cytokines, poly-peptides, and hormone-like molecules. Adipocytes make up the bulk of the human breast, with epithelial cells accounting for only approximately 10% of human breast volume. In many human breast cancers there is reduced connective tissue separating adipocytes from tumor cells. Furthermore, invasive tumors break through the basement membrane and infiltrate fibrous tissue barriers, resulting in an immediate juxtaposition of adipocytes and breast cancer cells, thus allowing paracrine interactions between the two cell types. This review will examine all three hypotheses that offer biological explanations for the underlying mechanism that associates obesity with postmenopausal breast cancer.
| Increased estrogen in obese postmenopausal women |
|---|
|
|
|---|
(TNF-
) and interleukin (IL)-6, are secreted by adipocytes and act in an autocrine or paracrine manner to stimulate production of aromatase (Purohit et al. 2002). Estrogen has long been known to be essential for normal mammary development and ductal growth and plays a central role in the development and progression of human breast cancer. Exposure to estrogen and/or an increase in estrogen receptor (ER) expression in human mammary epithelial cells (HMECs) increases the risk of breast cancer. The most convincing, but indirect, evidence for a role for estrogen with obesity is that circulating levels of estrogen are strongly and linearly related to adiposity in postmenopausal women, although this relationship is not seen in obese premenopausal women. Obese postmenopausal women have an increased production of estrogens, and obesity-related breast cancers are more often ER-positive (Rose et al. 2004).
| Obesity leads to insulin resistance and increased insulin concentrations |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Does a high concentration of circulating insulin correlate with incidence of breast cancer? It is well established that insulin stimulates DNA synthesis and is essential for cell growth in vitro. In pre-menopausal women undergoing biopsies for invasive breast cancer without lymph node metastasis or for benign non-proliferative disease, circulating insulin concentration correlated with breast cancer risk (Del Giudice et al. 1998). However, a positive effect of insulin concentration on breast cancer risk was seen only in the highest quintile of insulin levels. Hyperinsulinemia can also affect tumorigenesis indirectly by contributing to the synthesis and activity of IGF-I, a growth factor increasingly recognized as critical to breast cancer. IGF-I is a member of the IGF family, which consists of two polypeptide ligands, IGF-I and IGF-II, two membrane-bound tyrosine receptors, IGF-IR and IGF-IIR, and six insulin-like-binding proteins (IGFBPs), as well as IGFBP proteases. IGF-I and IGF-II can act in an endocrine, paracrine, or autocrine fashion to regulate cell growth, survival, transformation, and differentiation, and can synergize with other growth factors to produce enhanced mitogenic effects (Sachdev & Yee 2001, Zhang & Yee 2000). IGFBP-3 binds to and regulates the bioavailability of over 80% of circulating IGF-I. When bound to IGF-I, IGFBP-3 inhibits IGF-I signaling and promotes apoptosis through induction of caspases-7 and -8 (Kim et al. 2004). IGF-I can specifically target its receptors on human breast epithelial cells to induce mitogenic and antiapoptotic pathways. Binding of IGF-I to its receptor, IGF-IR, leads to dimerization of the receptor, activation of its tyrosine kinase activity and phosphorylation of key substrate proteins such as insulin receptor substrate-1 (IRS-1) and -2 (IRS-2) proteins and Src homology collagen (SHC). Then, the phosphorylated substrate proteins recruit different SH2-containing proteins and activate various intracellular signaling pathways, including phosphoinositide 3-kinase (PI 3-kinase) signaling pathways and mitogen-activated protein kinase (MAPK) signaling pathways. Both the PI 3-kinase and MAPK pathways are important for IGF-I-stimulated proliferation of MCF-7 human breast cancer cells in vitro (Jackson et al. 1998).
Overexpression of IGF-I is particularly effective in promoting tumor growth. Approximately one-half of primary breast tumors overexpress IGF-IR compared with normal tissue, suggesting that these carcinomas have enhanced responses to the mitogenic and antiapoptotic effects of IGF-I (Shimizu et al. 2004). Conversely, inactivation of IGF-IR results in reduced mammary tumor growth and metastasis in vivo (Le Roith 2003, Sachdev et al. 2004). Recently, a transgenic mouse model that overexpresses a CD8-IGF-IR fusion protein under the MMTV promoter was developed. These transgenic mice show abnormal mammary gland development and develop palpable mammary tumors within 8 weeks (Carboni et al. 2005). Taken together, these data suggest that IGF-IR may represent a potent target for anti-tumor therapy.
There is no simple, direct relationship between circulating concentrations of IGF-I and degree of adiposity. Several studies have shown a non-linear relationship between circulating concentrations of IGF-I and BMI, with the highest levels of IGF-I at a BMI of between 24 and 27 kg/m2 (Allen et al. 2003, Lukanova et al. 2002). High circulating concentrations of IGF-I were positively correlated with breast cancer risk in premenopausal women, but not postmenopausal women (Muti et al. 2002). Likewise, increased IGF-I and decreased levels of IGFBP-3 are correlated with ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS) in premenopausal women (Zhang & Yee 2002). Therefore, the relationship between IGF-I and IGF-I-IR and breast cancer risk in obese postmenopausal women may not be directly causal. However, the crosstalk between IGF pathways and estrogen-mediated signaling, both of which are greatly increased in obese postmenopausal women, may be an important physiological link between obesity and breast cancer risk.
| Insulin and estrogen work together |
|---|
|
|
|---|
transcriptional activity in breast cancer cell lines (Moschos & Mantzoros 2002, Sachdev & Yee 2001), even in the absence of estradiol (Jackson et al. 2001). Together, IGF-I and estradiol increase the transcriptional activation of ER to levels greater than observed with either ligand alone, suggesting synergistic capability (Yee & Lee 2000). Inhibition of MAPK or PI 3-kinase pathways with specific inhibitors abrogates the mitogenic effects of both IGF-I (Jackson et al. 1998) and estrogen in human breast cancer cells (Lobenhofer et al. 2000). Insulin increases proliferation of ER-positive breast cancer cell lines, but not ER-negative cell lines (Godden et al. 1992). In fact, ER-
function may be required to maintain IGF signaling pathways (Dupont & Le Roith 2001, Yee & Lee 2000). In ER-positive MCF-7 breast cancer cells, IGF-I can syngergize with estrogen to increase tumorigenicity, while loss of ER-
in MCF-7 cells leads to a decrease in IGF signaling and failure to proliferate in response to IGF or estrogen (Clarke et al. 1997). Thus, the insulin/IGF-I pathway interacts with estrogen to synergistically induce mitogenic responses in breast epithelial cells. Conversely, estrogen can increase the expression of IGF-I, IGF-IR, and IRS-1, resulting in enhanced tyrosine phosphorylation following IGF-I stimulation (Molloy et al. 2000, Yee & Lee 2000). Ligand-bound ER may activate the IGF-I pathway by direct binding and activation of IGF-IR (Kahlert et al. 2000) or by binding the p85 subunit of PI 3-kinase and the tyrosine kinase, Src, leading to activation of the PI 3-kinase and p21ras/MAPK pathways (Castoria et al. 1999).
Ultimately the mitogenic pathways stimulated by estrogen and insulin/IGF-I intersect at the G1S phase of cell-cycle progression. Estrogens induce mitogenic effects in breast epithelial cells by stimulating G0/G1 resting cells to re-enter the cell cycle and progress through the G1S transition and complete a round of cell division. Estrogen action in G1 phase is mediated by the transcription factor c-Myc. Expression of c-Myc is rapidly induced following estrogen stimulation and downregulated following antiestrogen treatment (Carroll et al. 2002). c-Myc is a direct downstream effector of estrogen action; antisense oligonucleotides to c-Myc inhibit the mitogenic effects of estrogen (Watson et al. 1991). Estrogen and insulin cooperate through their differential regulation of c-Myc and cyclin D1 to promote cell-cycle progression (Mawson et al. 2005).
Given that obese postmenopausal women have more estrogen and more IGF-I and insulin than slim women, it is logical to conclude that the above mechanisms for crosstalk between the IGF and estrogen pathways would influence breast tumorigenesis to a greater extent in obese postmenopausal women. However, verification of these interactions as the causal link between obesity and postmenopausal breast cancer is still needed.
| Hyperinsulinemia results in decreased concentrations of sex-hormone-binding globulin (SHBG) |
|---|
|
|
|---|
SHBG may act directly on breast cancer cells to inhibit estradiol induced cell proliferation. Binding of SHBG to its specific site on MCF-7 breast cancer cells induces the second messenger cAMP (Fortunati et al. 1999), and causes a complete inhibition of estradiol-induced MCF-7 cell proliferation (Fortunati et al. 1996). Pre-incubation of MCF-7 cells with SHBG before estradiol treatment abrogates the antiapoptotic effect of estradiol (Catalano et al. 2005). Thus, SHBG appears to be a regulator of estradiol action in breast cancer cells, acting as an anti-proliferative factor, loss of which in obese women could contribute to tumorigenesis.
| Adipocytes secrete adipokines that affect tumorigenesis |
|---|
|
|
|---|
The role of preadipocytes in tumor growth is somewhat more controversial. Preadipocytes are defined as immature adipocytes that express the S-100 protein, a marker that is not found in fibroblasts or endothelial cells. Some studies suggest that pre-adipocytes support the growth of breast tumor cells (Chamras et al. 1998), while other studies show that preadipocytes are either inhibitory (Johnston et al. 1992) or have no effect (Manabe et al. 2003) on breast cancer cell growth. Further studies are needed to elucidate what role, if any, preadipocytes play in breast tumorigenesis.
| Leptin |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Leptin gene expression occurs in normal mammary tissue, in breast cancer cell lines, and in solid tumors (Dieudonne et al. 2002, Laud et al. 2002). Mice deficient for leptin or leptin receptor have impaired mammary gland development (Hu et al. 2002). In a direct comparison, leptin receptors were not detectable in normal mammary epithelial cells by immunohistochemistry, whereas carcinoma cells showed positive staining for Ob-R in 83% of cases (Ishikawa et al. 2004). In fact, leptin was found to be overexpressed in as many as 92% of breast carcinomas examined, but in none of the cases of normal breast epithelium examined. Interestingly, distant metastasis was present in 21 (34%) cases of 61 Ob-R-positive tumors with leptin overexpression, but in none of the 15 cases where the tumors lacked Ob-R expression or leptin overexpression (P < 0.05; Ishikawa et al. 2004). Consequently, breast cancer patients with leptin receptor-positive tumors show significantly lower survival than those without leptin or leptin receptor overexpression or expression.
Leptin has been characterized as a growth factor for breast cancer. Leptin induces the proliferation of breast cancer cell lines T47D (Hu et al. 2002, Laud et al. 2002) and MCF-7 (Dieudonne et al. 2002, Okumura et al. 2002) by MAPK activation. Although exogenous leptin treatment stimulates proliferation of both transformed and normal breast cell lines, leptin-stimulated, anchorage-independent cell growth was enhanced only in the breast cancer cell line T47D (Hu et al. 2002). This suggests that besides having mitogenic effects, leptin can impact transformed breast cancer cells to induce an alteration to a more aggressive phenotype.
In the obese Zucker fatty rat model, which has a mutation of the long isoform of the leptin receptor, injection of the chemical carcinogen N-methyl-N-nitrosourea (MNU) caused only 10% of the obese rats to develop mammary carcinoma, while about one-half of MNU-treated lean rats developed mammary carcinoma (Lee et al. 2001). Curiously, 60% of MNU-treated obese rats developed epidermal mammary cysts, compared with 0% of MNU-treated lean rats. These results contrast the findings of a recent study in which obese Zucker fatty rats treated with the carcinogen 7,12-dimethylbenz(a)anthracene (DMBA) had a mammary tumor incidence double that of the lean control group with shorter tumor latency and more invasive histology (Hakkak et al. 2005). Hakkak and colleagues (2005) argue that different mechanisms of action of MNU and DMBA are responsible for the discrepancy in mammary tumor incidences in obese rats.
MMTV-TGF-
/LeprdbLeprdb mice that are genetically deficient in the long isoform of the leptin receptor and overexpress the oncogene TGF-
do not develop oncogene-induced mammary tumors (Cleary et al. 2003, 2004). These results suggest that, although obesity is linked to shorter latency period and higher tumor incidence, an absence of leptin in obese mice reduces the risk of developing oncogene-and carcinogen-induced mammary tumors very significantly. Clearly, leptin is an important growth factor secreted by adipocytes that strongly influences mammary tumor development.
What is the mechanism of leptin-mediated promotion of breast tumor growth? Its effects appear to be mediated primarily through ER action. Leptin upregulates the transcription of aromatase through enhanced binding of AP-1 to specific DNA sites in the promoter region (Catalano et al. 2003). Treatment of leptin also upregulates estradiol/ER-
signaling in MCF-7 cells exposed to aromatizable androgen, and this signal is down-regulated by the aromatase inhibitor letrozole. There is evidence that leptin treatment results in the direct activation of ER-
in MCF-7 breast cancer cells in the absence of its natural ligand. Leptin treatment caused the nuclear compartmentalization of ER-
and the upregulation of a classic estrogen-dependent gene pS2 (Catalano et al. 2004). Leptin also interferes with the effects of anti-estrogen ICI 182,780 on ER-
in breast cancer cells. The exposure of cells to 10 nmol/l ICI 182,780 blocks cell proliferation, induces rapid ER-
degradation, inhibits nuclear ER-
expression, and reduces ER
-dependent transcription from estrogen response element-containing promoters. All of these effects of ICI 182,780 are significantly attenuated by simultaneous treatment of cells with 100 ng/ml leptin (Garofalo et al. 2004). Furthermore, estrogen stimulates leptin secretion both in vitro and in vivo (Machinal et al. 1999). Thus, high leptin levels in obese breast cancer patients might contribute to the development of antiestrogen resistance.
If leptin expression is common in breast cancer, it could potentially serve as a tumor marker. Here again, there have been conflicting reports as to the level of plasma leptin in breast cancer patients and its utility as a marker for breast cancer. Some studies show that breast cancer patients have higher circulating levels of leptin and greater leptin mRNA expression than control subjects (Tessitore et al. 2004), while other studies find no correlation in plasma leptin levels and postmenopausal or pre-menopausal breast cancer (Sauter et al. 2004, Stattin et al. 2004). In another study, leptin was shown to interfere with insulin signaling (Fischer et al. 2002), and plasma leptin levels directly correlated with degree of insulin resistance in patients with type-2 diabetes (Fischer et al. 2002, Wauters et al. 2003). In summary, the available evidence can be summarized to state that leptin expression is upregulated in obesity and promotes breast tumor growth by signaling through its receptor and by direct effects on the ER pathway, although its utility as a breast cancer marker is not clear.
| Adiponectin |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Binding of full-length or globular ApN to AdipoR1 or AdipoR2 activates AMP-activated protein kinase (AMPK) and peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor (PPAR)-
metabolic pathways, leading to an increase in fatty acid oxidation, glucose uptake, and a decreased rate of gluconeogenesis, thus enhancing insulin sensitivity (Yamauchi et al. 2002). ApN gene expression is reduced by TNF-
(Kappes & Loffler 2000), and IL-6 (Fasshauer et al. 2003), whereas thiazolidine-dione agonists of PPAR-
increase ApN expression and plasma levels (Combs et al. 2002).
Interestingly, low serum levels of ApN are associated with several metabolic diseases, including obesity and insulin resistance in type-2 diabetes (Kadowaki & Yamauchi 2005). Serum levels of ApN are strongly inversely correlated with waist circumference and estimated visceral fat, even more so than BMI (Steffes et al. 2004). Studies confirm a significant inverse correlation between serum ApN levels and poor-prognosis breast cancer (Mantzoros et al. 2004, Miyoshi et al. 2003). Brakenhielm et al. (2004) found that treatment of physiologic levels of ApN inhibited mouse fibrosarcoma tumor neovascularization. Thus, obese individuals with low levels of serum ApN could be at a higher risk of developing tumors with aggressive angiogenic support.
Little is known regarding the potential of ApN to directly affect breast epithelial cell growth, proliferation, and differentiation. It has been shown that ligand binding to AdipoR1 and AdipoR2 activates the PPAR-
pathway (Kadowaki & Yamauchi 2005). PPARs activate the transcription of diverse genes that are involved in the regulation of such processes as cell proliferation and differentiation, including adipocyte differentiation. Treatments with PPAR agonists have been useful in treating insulin resistance, although they have also been linked to body-weight gain, a problem that may be ameliorated by the use of partial PPAR agonists. Furthermore, PPAR ligands inhibit the proliferation and promote the differentiation of liposarcoma, colon, breast, and prostate cancer cells by lowering the threshold for apoptosis and inducing arrest in the G1 phase of the cell cycle. These cells also show a more differentiated and less malignant phenotype. Previous reports have demonstrated the importance of PPARs in the pathogenesis of breast cancer. Treatment of MCF-7 cells in vitro with PPAR-
agonist for 16 h significantly increased nuclear levels of the tumor suppressor BRCA1 (Pignatelli et al. 2003). Therefore, one plausible, yet unsubstantiated, explanation for an association between low levels of ApN and breast cancer risk is that downregulation of ApN ligand in obesity may result in decreased PPAR signaling and low nuclear levels of BRCA1, and thereby lower levels of DNA repair.
TNF-
|
|---|
|
|
|---|
was the first inflammatory cytokine to be identified as being secreted by adipocytes. TNF-
expression in white adipose tissue was initially demonstrated in rodents, and found to be markedly increased in obese models (Hotamisligil et al. 1993). It has been proposed that TNF-
plays a role in the development of insulin resistance through multiple effects, including the inhibition of the insulin receptor signaling pathway (Hotamisligil 2003). The extent to which TNF-
produced in adipose tissue is released into the circulation is unknown, although a correlation between the TNF-
system (including the soluble receptors) and indices of obesity has been reported (Bullo et al. 2003).
TNF-
in adipose tissue acts in both an autocrine and a paracrine manner to influence a range of processes, including apoptosis and the synthesis of several cytokines and other adipokines (Coppack 2001). Recent studies have shown the that TNF-
is a key regulator of the synthesis of IL-6 (do Nascimento et al. 2004), and the biosynthesis of estrogen by stimulating aromatase expression in adipose tissue in vivo (Purohit & Reed 2002). Therefore, obese individuals with an overall increase in fat tissue mass could have an increase in circulating TNF-
that could lead to breast tumorigenesis by contributing to insulin resistance and regulating the synthesis of IL-6, a hypothesis that remains to be verified.
| IL-6 |
|---|
|
|
|---|
| Future directions |
|---|
|
|
|---|
transgenic mice. Delineating the function of each of the adipokines is important to continue to identify key molecules important for breast cancer development. From the current body of literature it seems clear that, in humans, expression of adipokines varies with degree of adiposity. Micro-environmental cues depending on the degree of adiposity may direct the expression and secretion of adipokines from adipocytes. Murine 3T3-L1 adipocytes are a useful and widely used model system; however, 3T3-L1 adipocytes may not secrete the same array of adipokines in the same concentrations as human adipocytes from an obese individual. Human adipocyte cell lines from obese and slim individuals, very easily established in culture from liposuction samples, could provide a useful alternative to murine adipocyte cell lines. Another approach would be to utilize the in vivo model developed by Weinberg and colleagues. In this mouse model, the mammary fat pad of an immunodeficient mouse is cleared and reconstituted with desired experimental stromal and epithelial components (Kuperwasser et al. 2004). Reconstitution of the mammary fat pad with epithelial cells and human adipose tissue from obese or slim individuals may provide more precise information as to the function of adipocytes in obesity.
| Implications for therapy and treatment |
|---|
|
|
|---|
There have been several studies that suggest that obese women are less likely to seek regular preventive screenings, such as clinical breast examinations or mammograms (Meisinger et al. 2004, Wee et al. 2004). This is significant because preventive screening is thought to be one of the most effective evidence-based tools for the control of breast cancer by early diagnosis. The psychological or sociological reasons for avoiding clinical examinations could be determined and ameliorated to ensure that breast cancer in obese women is detected as early as possible.
The effect of weight loss and maintenance of a lean body mass on breast cancer risk has been studied with moderate to significant results. In three studies, weight loss occurring over a prolonged interval was associated with only a slightly lower risk that did not reach significance (Ballard-Barbash et al. 1990, Brinton & Swanson 1992, Trentham-Dietz et al. 1997). Other studies show that overweight post-menopausal women who intentionally lose 20 lb or more have cancer rates similar to lean women (Parker & Folsom 2003), and that losing
10% body weight significantly reduces the concentrations of estrone, total and bioavailable estradiol, serum leptin, blood lipids, and insulin (Jen et al. 2004). These studies suggest that weight loss through calorie deficit and/or exercise improves breast cancer risk. Obesity is therefore a modifiable breast cancer risk.
Obese postmenopausal women have an increase in circulating estrogen and aromatase compared with slimmer women. Antiestrogens are widely used in the management of hormonally responsive breast cancer in both adjuvant and palliative settings, and are currently being evaluated as chemo-preventive agents. The classical mechanism of action of these drugs involves inhibition of estrogen-stimulated neoplastic cell proliferation by blockade of estrogen receptors present on breast cancer cells. The commonly used antiestrogen tamoxifen also acts to reduce serum IGF-I levels, which are increased in obese women. Aromatase inhibitors are a newer class of drug that bind reversibly or irreversibly to the aromatase enzyme in peripheral fat and also in the breast, leading to undetectable plasma levels of estrogens in postmenopausal women. These agents have been shown to be more effective than tamoxifen in first-line treatment of estrogen receptor-positive advanced and metastatic breast cancer. Additionally, aromatase inhibitors have been demonstrated to be superior as both adjuvant and neoadjuvant treatment and show reduced uterine growth side effects when compared with tamoxifen (Morales et al. 2005). Therefore, antiestrogen therapy and aromatase inhibitors may show increased efficacy in obese breast cancer patients and may be used as a chemopreventive in obese postmenopausal women.
Examination of pathways that are altered in obesity and metabolic syndrome may offer new targets for breast cancer therapy. Drugs that target IGF-IR may prove effective in reducing insulin-mediated growth and proliferation of tumors cells. Adiponectin receptor agonists may provide novel therapies for ameliorating insulin resistance and possibly in directly inhibiting mammary epithelial cell proliferation. Many more studies are needed to determine the feasibility of the latter.
| Summary |
|---|
|
|
|---|
|
| Acknowledgements |
|---|
| References |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Allen NE, Appleby PN, Kaaks R, Rinaldi S, Davey GK & Key TJ 2003 Lifestyle determinants of serum insulin-like growth-factor-I (IGF-I), C-peptide and hormone binding protein levels in British women. Cancer Causes Control 14 6574.[CrossRef][ISI][Medline]
Arita Y, Kihara S, Ouchi N, Maeda K, Kuriyama H, Okamoto Y, Kumada M, Hotta K, Nishida M, Takahashi M et al. 2002 Adipocyte-derived plasma protein adiponectin acts as a platelet-derived growth factor-BB-binding protein and regulates growth factor-induced common postreceptor signal in vascular smooth muscle cell. Circulation 105 28932898.
Bachelot T, Ray-Coquard I, Menetrier-Caux C, Rastkha M, Duc A & Blay JY 2003 Prognostic value of serum levels of interleukin 6 and of serum and plasma levels of vascular endothelial growth factor in hormone-refractory metastatic breast cancer patients. British Journal of Cancer 88 17211726.[CrossRef][ISI][Medline]
Ballard-Barbash R, Schatzkin A, Taylor PR & Kahle LL 1990 Association of change in body mass with breast cancer. Cancer Research 50 21522155.
Berclaz G, Li S, Price KN, Coates AS, Castiglione-Gertsch M, Rudenstam CM, Holmberg SB, Lindtner J, Erien D, Collins J et al. 2004 Body mass index as a prognostic feature in operable breast cancer: the International Breast Cancer Study Group experience. Annals of Oncology 15 875884.
Brakenhielm E, Veitonmaki N, Cao R, Kihara S, Matsuzawa Y, Zhivotovsky B, Funahashi T & Cao Y 2004 Adiponectin-induced antiangiogenesis and antitumor activity involve caspase-mediated endothelial cell apoptosis. PNAS 101 24762481.
Brinton LA & Swanson CA 1992 Height and weight at various ages and risk of breast cancer. Annals of Epidemiology 2 597609.[Medline]
Bullo M, Garcia-Lorda P, Megias I & Salas-Salvado J 2003 Systemic inflammation, adipose tissue tumor necrosis factor, and leptin expression. Obesity Research 11 525531.[ISI][Medline]
Bulun SE, Mahendroo MS & Simpson ER 1994 Aromatase gene expression in adipose tissue: relationship to breast cancer. Journal of Steroid Biochemistry & Molecular Biology 49 319326.[CrossRef][ISI][Medline]
Calle EE, Rodriguez C, Walker-Thurmond K & Thun MJ 2003 Overweight, obesity, and mortality from cancer in a prospectively studied cohort of U.S. adults. New England Journal of Medicine 348 16251638.
Carboni JM, Lee AV, Hadsell DL, Rowley BR, Lee FY, Bol DK, Camuso AE, Gottardis M, Greer AF, Ho CP et al. 2005 Tumor development by transgenic expression of a constitutively active insulin-like growth factor I receptor. Cancer Research 65 37813787.
Carpenter CL, Ross RK, Paganini-Hill A & Bernstein L 2003 Effect of family history, obesity and exercise on breast cancer risk among postmenopausal women. International Journal of Cancer 106 96102.[CrossRef][ISI][Medline]
Carroll JS, Swarbrick A, Musgrove EA & Sutherland RL 2002 Mechanisms of growth arrest by c-myc antisense oligonucleotides in MCF-7 breast cancer cells: implications for the antiproliferative effects of antiestrogens. Cancer Research 62 31263131.
Castoria G, Barone MV, Di Domenico M, Bilancio A, Ametrano D, Migliaccio A & Auricchio F 1999 Non-transcriptional action of oestradiol and progestin triggers DNA synthesis. EMBO Journal 18 25002510.[CrossRef][ISI][Medline]
Catalano MG, Frairia R, Boccuzzi G & Fortunati N 2005 Sex hormone-binding globulin antagonizes the anti-apoptotic effect of estradiol in breast cancer cells. Molecular & Cellular Endocrinology 230 3137.[CrossRef]
Catalano S, Marsico S, Giordano C, Mauro L, Rizza P, Panno ML & Ando S 2003 Leptin enhances, via AP-1, expression of aromatase in the MCF-7 cell line. Journal of Biological Chemistry 278 2866828676.
Catalano S, Mauro L, Marsico S, Giordano C, Rizza P, Rago V, Montanaro D, Maggiolini M, Panno ML & Ando S 2004 Leptin induces, via ERK1/ERK2 signal, functional activation of estrogen receptor
in MCF-7 cells. Journal of Biological Chemistry 279 1990819915.
Chamras H, Bagga D, Elstner E, Setoodeh K, Koeffler HP & Heber D 1998 Preadipocytes stimulate breast cancer cell growth. Nutrition & Cancer 32 5963.
Clarke RB, Howell A & Anderson E 1997 Type I insulin-like growth factor receptor gene expression in normal human breast tissue treated with oestrogen and progesterone. British Journal of Cancer 75 251257.[ISI][Medline]
Cleary MP, Phillips FC, Getzin SC, Jacobson TL, Jacobson MK, Christensen TA, Juneja SC, Grande JP & Maihle NJ 2003 Genetically obese MMTV-TGF-alpha/Lep(ob)Lep(ob) female mice do not develop mammary tumors. Breast Cancer Research & Treatment 77 205215.[CrossRef][ISI][Medline]
Cleary MP, Juneja SC, Phillips FC, Hu X, Grande JP & Maihle NJ 2004 Leptin receptor-deficient MMTV-TGFalpha/Lepr(db)Lepr(db) female mice do not develop oncogene-induced mammary tumors. Experimental Biology & Medicine (Maywood) 229 182193.
Cocca C, Martin G, Rivera E, Davio C, Cricco G, Lemos B, Fitzsimons C, Gutierrez A, Levin E, Levin R et al. 1998 An experimental model of diabetes and cancer in rats. European Journal of Cancer 34 889894.