|
|
||||||||
REVIEW |
b
och1
Department of Nuclear Medicine and Endocrine Oncology and
1 Clinic of Oncological Surgery, Maria Sk
odowska-Curie Memorial Cancer Center and Institute of Oncology, Gliwice Branch, Wybrzezÿe Armii Krajowej 14, 44-100 Gliwice, Poland
(Requests for offprints should be addressed to B Jarz
b; Email: bjarzab{at}io.gliwice.pl)
| Abstract |
|---|
|
|
|---|
18 years of age. The population is heterogenous and the differences between prepubertal children and pubertals and adolescents are to be considered. Although very little has been reported on children with sporadic DTC under the age of 10 years, juvenile DTC has at least some undeniable differences with adult DTC: (1) larger primary tumor at diagnosis; (2) metastatic pattern and features, namely: (a) greater prevalence of neck lymph node and distant metastases at diagnosis, (b) lungs almost the sole distant metastatic site, (c) pulmonary metastases nearly always functional; (3) closer-to-normal and more frequent sodium-iodide symporter (NIS) expression; and (4) higher recurrence rate but longer overall survival. These differences are especially distinct in prepubertal children. The goals of primary treatment of juvenile DTC are to eradicate disease and extend not only overall, but recurrence-free survival (RFS). Extending RFS is itself a desirable goal in children because it improves quality-of-life, alleviates anxiety during psychologically formative years, reduces medical resource consumption, and may increase overall survival. Primary treatment of DTC generally comprises a combination of surgery, radioiodine (131I) ablation, and thyroid hormone therapy applied at varying levels of intensity. Therapeutic decision-making must rely on retrospective adult and/or pediatric outcome studies and on treatment guidelines formulated mostly for adults. Differences between juvenile and adult DTC and physiology dictate distinct treatment strategies for children. We, and many others, advocate a routine intensive approach because of the more advanced disease at diagnosis, propensity for recurrence, and greater radioiodine responsiveness in children, as well as published evidence of significant survival benefits, especially regarding RFS. This intensive approach consists of total thyroidectomy and central lymphadenectomy in all cases, completed by modified lateral lymphadenectomy when necessary and followed by radioiodine administration. However, absence of prospective studies and of universal proof of overall cause-specific survival benefits of this approach have led some to propose more conservative strategies. Most European centers give radioiodine ablation to the vast majority of juvenile DTC patients. Ablation seeks to destroy any residual cancer, including microfoci, as well as healthy thyroid remnant. Large studies have documented the procedure to decrease cause-specific death rates and, in children, to significantly lessen locoregional recurrence rates (by factors of 211) independent of the extent of surgery. There is universal agreement on treating inoperable functional metastases with large radioiodine activities. Treatment is especially effective in small tumor foci up to 1 cm in diameter, and should be administered every 612 months until complete response, loss of functionality, or attainment of cumulative activities between 18.537GBq (5001000 mCi). Radioiodine therapy is generally safe. Short-term side effects include nausea and vomiting (more frequent in children than in adults), transient neck pain and edema, sialadenitis (<5% incidence), mild myelosuppression (~25%), transient impairment of gonadal function both in females and males (sperm quality in boys), or nasolacrimal obstruction (~3%), with most cases generally being asymptomaticmoderate, self-limiting, or easily prevented or treated. If pregnancy is ruled out before each 131I administration, and conception avoided in the year afterward, radioiodine therapy appears not to impair fertility. However, therapeutic 131I carries a small but definite increase in cancer risk, particularly in the salivary glands, colon, rectum, soft tissue and bone. To better guide primary treatment, different therapeutic combinations should be prospectively compared using RFS as the primary endpoint. Efforts also should be made to identify molecular signatures predicting recurrence, metastasis and mortality.
| Introduction |
|---|
|
|
|---|
18 years old. Unless noted otherwise, the adjectives juvenile or pediatric refer to prepubertal, pubertal and adolescent patients collectively. Simultaneously, it should be borne in mind that the clinical DTC course in prepubertal children shows distinct differences in comparison to pubertals and adolescents and these differences will be referred to whenever necessary. We use the term therapy to comprise radioiodine ablation of healthy thyroid remnant, treatment of local or metastatic disease, or both. We begin by summarizing juvenile DTC epidemiology. Next, we evaluate the characteristics and natural history of this entity, highlighting putative differences with the adult disease, many of which, in our opinion, dictate a distinct treatment strategy for children, especially those
10 or 15 years old. We then look at primary treatment outcomes and strategies, emphasizing differences between conservative and intensive approaches, in an effort to place the role of radioiodine ablation in context. A discussion of radioiodine treatment of metastatic disease follows, after which we focus on specific radioiodine therapy-related issues, namely safety, thyroid-stimulating hormone (TSH) stimulation, dosimetric considerations, stunning, and low-iodine diets. We close by summarizing future directions and the current status of radioiodine therapy. | Epidemiology of juvenile DTC |
|---|
|
|
|---|
18 years. However, it does account for ~10% of malignant tumors and ~35% of carcinomas in children (Bernstein & Gurney 1999). In the US, ~350 people age <20 years are diagnosed with thyroid carcinoma each year (Bernstein & Gurney 1999). In Europe, annual numbers of new sporadic pediatric cases are less well characterized (Storm & Plesko 2001). DTC comprises 9095% of all childhood thyroid cancers (Harach & Williams 1995, Hassoun et al. 1997, Bernstein & Gurney 1999, Yusuf et al. 2003). Medullary thyroid cancer is diagnosed in 58%, however, with more thorough screening, higher incidences have been registered (Harach & Williams 1995). Undifferentiated tumors, i.e., insular and anaplastic cancer, are extremely rare (Hassoun et al. 1997).
Thyroid carcinoma occurrence is negligible in very young children, although the literature contains isolated clinical cases in 46-month-old infants or even neonates (Harness et al. 1992, Newman et al. 1998, Schlumberger et al. 2004a). Age-specific incidence rates diverge for males and females starting at age 10 years, and increase substantially for females from age 1314 years (Harach & Williams 1995, Bernstein & Gurney 1999) (Fig. 1
). Although the very low thyroid cancer incidence in children precludes a definitive evaluation, most authors agree that from 1975 to 1995, incidence rates in the <20-year-old population remained rather stable in the US, Great Britain and Germany (Harach & Williams 1995, Bernstein & Gurney 1999, Farahati et al. 2004), though not completely without fluctuation (Niedziela et al. 2004, Leenhardt et al. 2004).
|
The second peak in pediatric thyroid cancer incidence occurred in the early 1990s in some Eastern European countries. It stemmed from environmental contamination with radioactive iodine from the 1986 Chernobyl nuclear power plant catastrophe (Mahoney et al. 2004, Murbeth et al. 2004, Parfitt 2004). The peak started just 45 years after exposure, reaching its maximum in the mid-1990s, and the disease developed mainly in children<5 years old at exposure, with onset before age 14 years (Farahati et al. 1997, 2000, Tronko et al. 1999, Mahoney et al. 2004). The accelerated onset relative to external irradiation-induced disease (Ron et al. 1995) may be attributable to radiation dose rate differences and to endemic iodine deficiency in Eastern Europe (Mahoney et al. 2004). The Chernobyl experience confirmed the thyroids markedly higher sensitivity to the effects of ionizing radiation during early childhood vs adulthood (Michel & Donckier 2002).
As may be inferred above, juvenile DTC may be classified as sporadic or radiation-induced. These two forms do not appear to have major clinical differences (Samaan et al. 1987, Viswanathan et al. 1994, Gow et al. 2003). Very frequent extra-thyroidal local invasion and distant metastases initially were believed to be peculiarities of Chernobyl-induced pediatric DTC. However, the majority of clinically evident Chernobyl-related tumors were diagnosed at ~10 years of age (Nikiforov & Gnepp 1994, Farahati et al. 1997, Tronko et al. 1999), an age at which these disease characteristics also occur very frequently in sporadic DTC (Harach & Williams 1995, Newman et al. 1998).
| Characteristics and natural history of juvenile DTC |
|---|
|
|
|---|
|
Second, children differ from adults in their pattern and features of metastases. Pediatric patients are more likely to present with cervical lymph node or distant metastases (Farahati et al. 1997, Robie et al. 1998). For example, among 1039 consecutive PTC patients treated at the Mayo Clinic, neck node involvement was found in nearly 90% and distant metastases, in almost 7% of children, versus in 35% and just over 2% of adults, respectively (Zimmerman et al. 1988). In fact, one of two peaks in the rate of PTC metastases at diagnosis occurs in children (the other, in patients >60 years old) (Mazzaferri & Jhiang 1994b). In addition, distant metastases outside the lungs are very rare in children, albeit they should be sought in cases of unexplained thyroglobulin (Tg) elevation. The literature contains only scattered reports of bone lesions which ultimately led to death (Schlumberger et al. 1987, Newman et al. 1998). Just a few cases of brain or other soft tissue metastases have been described in children (Hay 1987, Newman et al. 1998). Further, unlike adult lesions, pediatric pulmonary DTC metastases are overwhelmingly miliary and seldom nodular, and when detected radiographically, are almost always functional (Vassilopoulou-Sellin et al. 1993, Schlumberger et al. 1996a, La Quaglia et al. 2000, Reiners et al. 2002, Ronga et al. 2004). For example, among 95 Byelorussian children with Chernobyl-induced DTC lung metastases, 92 (97%) had disseminated, and only 3 (3%), nodular pulmonary radioiodine uptake (Reiners et al. 2002). Lung metastases were functional in 40 (95%) of 42 children with pulmonary DTC involvement seen at our institution from 1973 to 2002 (B Jarzab, unpublished observations).
The high prevalence of functional metastases in pediatric DTC relates to a third difference with the adult disease: although sodium iodide symporter (NIS) expression is reduced compared with that of healthy thyroid cells, childhood tumors appear to have greater and more frequently detectable expression than do adult tumors (Ringel et al. 2001, Patel et al. 2002, Faggiano et al. 2004). In the absence of TSH stimulation, NIS expression is undetectable in ~65% of papillary and ~56% of follicular cancers in patients <20 years of age (Patel et al. 2002). In contrast, NIS expression is absent or below normal in ~90% of adult DTC, as assessed by reverse transcription PCR (Ringel et al. 2001) or immunohistochemistry (Mian et al. 2001, Gerard et al. 2003). Expression of other iodine transport-related molecules, pendrin and apical iodide transporter (AIT), also has been found to be reduced in pediatric (M Wiench and M Kovalska, unpublished observations) as well as in adult DTC (Gerard et al. 2003, Lacroix et al. 2004), but it is unclear if expression is greater in childhood DTC.
The greater NIS expression in juvenile than in adult DTC implies greater differentiation and radioiodine responsiveness in the former, which may be relevant to outcome. In young patients, recurrence risk was increased in NIS-negative vs NIS-positive tumors, even when Tumor Node Metastasis (TNM) status and treatment were similar (Patel et al. 2002). The degree of NIS expression in primary DTC lesions correlated with subsequent radioiodine uptake in metastases (Castro et al. 2001) and the clinical response of recurrences (Min et al. 2001).
A fourth major characteristic of juvenile vs adult DTC is a generally higher recurrence rate (Mazzaferri & Massoll 2002). With 16.6 years follow-up, this rate approaches 40% in patients with PTC diagnosed when <20 years old, vs ~20% in patients diagnosed at age 2050 years (Mazzaferri & Kloos 2001).
Fifth, overall survival seems to be distinctly better in children than in adults. The contrast between the generally advanced disease at diagnosis and frequent recurrences and the low mortality is particularly striking. Not more than 35 cause-specific deaths occurred among some 2000 recently reported children and young adults (Table 2A
).
|
Many differences between pediatric and adult DTC, namely the larger size and wider extent at presentation, more limited distant metastatic sites and greater propensity for recurrence, seem undeniable and presumably have a biological explanation. One such possible explanation relates to onset delay. Nearly all RET PTC-initiating mutations presumably occur in childhood; after puberty, they would not be transmitted to later generations of cells, given that the division potential of thyroid cells expires early (Williams 1995, Dumont et al. 2003). Thus the PTCs with the fastest clinical onset become detectable in children.
It remains unclear how much of the explanation for these differences lies in DTC molecular biology. To date, little has been determined about this area in children. In PTC, mutation of any of at least four genes, RET, NTRK, BRAF, or, much less frequently, RAS, activates the MAP kinase cascade, thereby initiating tumorigenesis via increased transcription of growth and proliferation genes (Viglietto et al. 1995, Kimura et al. 2003, Fagin 2004). Many studies suggest that distribution of the four mutated genes may differ between children and adults, with higher prevalence of RET rearrangements (Bongarzone et al. 1996, Nikiforov et al. 1997, Fenton et al. 2000b, Wiench et al. 2001) and absence of BRAF (Kumagai et al. 2004) mutations in children, but contradictory data have been reported (Motomura et al. 1998, Elisei et al. 2001). There are suggestions that particular gene mutations may serve as prognostic markers (Nikiforov et al. 1997). For example, in adults, RET rearrangements appear to be associated with development of relatively indolent microcancers, and never with anaplastic tumors, notwithstanding these tumors frequent PTC origin (Fagin 2004). However, early suggestions of more advanced disease in RET- (Sugg et al. 1996) or RET- and NTRK-positive cases (Bongarzone et al. 1998), were not confirmed in a later study (Fenton et al. 2000b) that addressed recurrences but had a relatively short, 3.6-year median follow-up. Other data (Elisei et al. 2001, Basolo et al. 2001) also fail to support any relationship between RET immunopositivity and PTC prognosis.
Other differences include lack of mutations seen in adults, for example in G(s)alpha gene (Waldmann & Rabes 1997). Regarding genes known for prognostic significance in non-thyroid cancers, one study (Ramirez et al. 2000) suggests that over-expression of MET alone, or, especially, together with the gene for this tyrosine kinase receptors ligand, hepatocyte growth factor/scatter factor, is associated with a heightened PTC recurrence risk in children and young adults. However, other groups (Wasenius et al. 2003, Finley et al. 2004) and our studies (Jarzab et al. 2005) suggest that MET over-expression characterizes the majority of PTCs, at least at the RNA level. Limited numbers of studies have correlated over-expression in PTC cells of vascular endothelial growth factor and its receptor with tumor size in children (Fenton et al. 2000a), of all tyrosine kinases with PTC recurrence risk in young adults (Patel et al. 2000) or of telomerase with advanced disease in children and adolescents (Straight et al. 2002). Much additional study is needed to verify these putative relationships and elucidate their mechanisms of action, and to establish any prognostic utility for these markers.
In the case of follicular thyroid cancer (FTC), two genes involved in neoplastic transformation should be mentioned, RAS and PPARG, the rearrangement of the latter triggering transformation of follicular adenoma to follicular carcinoma (Nikiforova et al. 2003). However, even less is known about the possible prognostic importance of mutations in these genes or about their distribution in children than is known with the analogous PTC mutations. Some authors (Nikiforova et al. 2003) claim that the PPARG rearrangement is more frequent in FTC occurring at a younger age.
In explaining the distinct natural history of childhood DTC, not only tumor molecular biology but differences between the juvenile and adult thyroid gland and host organism must be addressed. Age-related thyroid gland differences are not yet well-characterized molecularly, however, some investigations became possible in healthy thyroid glands obtained surgically from RET mutation carriers (Faggiano et al. 2004). These data suggest that children have more metabolically active and functional thyroid glands than do adults. Follicles <100 µm, considered active, were prevalent in children <12 years old, while follicles >200 µm, considered hypofunctioning, were more frequent in older individuals including adults up to age 40 years. In addition, younger patients had a higher proportion of thyroid cells and follicles immunopositive for iodide-transport- and organification-related molecules, among them NIS, pendrin, thyroid peroxidase and dinucleotide phosphate oxidase (Duox; thyroid H2O2 generator), but not AIT. The degree of NIS, pendrin and Duox expression also was independently associated with younger age, regardless of follicular size.
The key host organism difference might be in immune response to thyroid cancer (Boyd & Baker 1996, Mitsiades et al. 1999). A variety of observations support the importance of that response in preventing PTC metastasis or recurrence in adults (Matsubayashi et al. 1995, Loh et al. 1999, Modi et al. 2003) and children (Gupta et al. 2001). Gupta found that the pediatric PTC patients with the greatest number of proliferating lymphocytes in thyroid infiltrates had the longest disease-free survival. Of interest, intense tumor expression of the B7-2 antigen has been correlated with a greater propensity for recurrence in children and adolescents with DTC (Shah et al. 2002).
Some differences between pediatric and adult DTC may to at least some degree be artifacts of the observation period. For example, the purported low mortality rate of pediatric DTC may reflect relatively short follow-ups compared with patients lifespans. As seen in Table 2A
, most reports on DTC diagnosed in childhood have a median follow-up of
15 years. However, a high proportion of causespecific deaths may take place longer-term (Vassilopoulou-Sellin et al. 1998). For example, in the analysis of Harach & Williams (1995), mortality was 10% in the subgroup of 34 patients with
20- year follow-up. In one of the largest single-institution series, that of the Institut Gustave Roussy (Schlumberger et al. 1987), 15% (6/40) of patients diagnosed with DTC at age <12 years succumbed to their tumor 1233 years after initial treatment. The two cause-specific deaths in a 329-patient multi-institutional study with an 11.3-year median follow-up (Newman et al. 1998) took place 16 and 18 years post-diagnosis. In another series, DTC mortality was noted as late as 59 years after presentation (Landau et al. 2000).
Of interest, the relatively short follow-up in many studies also may lead to underestimation of the recurrence rate in patients diagnosed as children. In a large mixed young adult and pediatric series (~25% patients <17 years old), Welch Dinauer et al. (1998) observed 90% of recurrences within 7 years of diagnosis. However, in a similar-sized purely pediatric series, La Quaglia et al. (1988) observed only 50% of recurrences within 16 years after primary treatment. Relapses have been noted as long as 25 years after primary treatment (La Quaglia et al. 1988) or 44 years after diagnosis (Landau et al. 2000), and among DTC patients diagnosed at any age, Mazzaferri found 15% of locoregional and 24% of distant recurrences more than two decades after initial therapy (Mazzaferri 2004).
Within the pediatric DTC population, some investigators found an association between younger age at diagnosis and a higher rate of (Landau et al. 2000) or shorter time to (La Quaglia et al. 1988) recurrence. Alessandri et al. (2000) identified age at diagnosis as the major determinant of recurrence risk in pediatric DTC: 20-year recurrence-free survival (RFS) was 10.1% in patients diagnosed at age <10 years, vs 48.3% in patients diagnosed at ages 1018 years (P=0.008). However, the statistical significance of the association was not evident in multivariate analysis.
Our own work with larger series confirms this pattern. Univariate analysis of our original series of 103 pediatric DTC patients (Jarzab et al. 2000) revealed a poorer RFS when patients were diagnosed at age
10 years vs at age 1113 or 1417 years (0% vs 70% vs 88% respectively, P=0.05). However, age was non-significant in a multivariate analysis including treatment-related factors. With respect to locoregional recurrence, we now have extended these results to a larger population of 235 juvenile DTC patients, more than 100 diagnosed at age<15 years, and to our knowledge, the largest group yet reported of children followed according to a detailed, standard protocol (Handkiewicz-Junak D, Wloch J, Roskosz J, Krajewska J, Wróbel A, Kukulska A, Puch Z, Wygoda Z & Jarz
b B, unpublished observations). In our opinion, previous observations of worse outcome in the youngest patients were biased by a sometimes less intensive treatment approach in this group.
| Primary treatment of juvenile DTC |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Despite differences between PTC and FTC in molecular biology, histology and clinical picture, especially lymph node involvement at diagnosis, interventions are similar for both (Reynolds & Robbins 1997, Newman et al. 1998, Mazzaferri & Massoll 2002, Ringel & Ladenson 2004). As with adult disease, primary treatment of pediatric DTC generally comprises some combination of three modalities, surgery, radioiodine ablation, and thyroid hormone therapy, applied at varying levels of intensity.
Surgery may range from lobectomy to total thyroidectomy. According to the recent guidelines of national and international societies and recent publications, total thyroidectomy is the preferred operation in cancers >pT1a (Mazzaferri & Kloos 2001, Ringel & Ladenson 2004, Watkinson 2004) and is routinely accompanied by en bloc dissection of the central compartment with clearing of lymphatic and soft tissue. Modified lateral neck dissection is advocated in cases of metastases to lateral lymph node compartments. The main potential complications include persistent hypoparathyroidism and recurrent laryngeal nerve injury of varying clinical relevance (van Santen et al. 2004, Schneider et al. 2004). After total or neartotal thyroidectomy, thyroid remnant volume should be <2ml on sonography performed no earlier than 1 month after the procedure (Maxon 1999, Mazzaferri & Massoll 2002).
Even after total thyroidectomy and negative postoperative sonography, some 131I uptake usually appears in the thyroid bed, particularly if scintigraphy is performed with an activity higher than that normally used for diagnostic whole-body scan (WBS) (Zidan et al. 2004). Most often, this residual uptake is attributable to healthy thyroid remnant cells. However, as tumor multifocality is frequent in DTC, especially PTC, and metastatic spread common in pediatric patients, the presence of cancer microfoci must be considered. In most European centers, as recommended by most guidelines (Reynolds & Robbins 1997, Mazzaferri & Massoll 2002, Haugen 2004), thyroid remnant ablation is routinely given to the vast majority of, if not all DTC patients to destroy every source of uptake, for several reasons which do play even a more prominent role in juvenile DTC (Table 3
). However, adjuvant radioiodine should be given to complete, not to replace total thyroidectomy: ablation success rates are significantly lower when patients have less extensive thyroid surgery (Maxon 1999), and our multivariate analysis in a large series of young DTC patients (Table 4
) shows that the two maneuvers are independent predictors of RFS, as previously reported in a general PTC population (Mazzaferri & Kloos 2001).
|
|
Ablation also should entail performance of a post-therapy or post-ablation WBS, generally 37 days after radioiodine administration. Detection or confirmation of functional metastases on this scan implies further radioiodine treatment, sometimes in combination with surgery.
The third modality in DTC primary treatment is thyroid hormone therapy with levo-thyroxine (T4). This modality is termed thyroid hormone suppressive therapy (THST) when supraphysiological doses are used to suppress serum TSH to subnormal levels, thereby reducing the risk of the TSH stimulating tumor growth and proliferation (Mazzaferri & Jhiang 1994b, Pujol et al. 1996). At present, many authors propose slightly suppressed, lownormal or even normal TSH levels as endpoints for thyroid hormone therapy (Mazzaferri & Massoll 2002, Barbaro et al. 2003, Schlumberger et al. 2004a, b).
A number of long-term safety issues surround THST, particularly in growing patients who are likely to receive the modality for a very long time (Muller et al. 1995, Shapiro et al. 1997, Horne et al. 2004, Botella-Carretero et al. 2004). Potential THST side effects may include osteoporosis (Schneider & Reiners 2003), and of special concern, cardiovascular complications, particularly ventricular hypertrophy (Biondi et al. 1993, Fazio et al. 1995, Matuszewska et al. 2001). In addition, target serum TSH levels need to be adjusted very carefully in children to avoid impairing physiological growth and development.
Primary treatment strategies
The goals of primary treatment of DTC are to eradicate disease and extend not only overall, but recurrence-free survival. Though sometimes and, we believe, curiously overlooked in debates on treatment strategies, maximizing RFS is, in our opinion, an important and desirable endpoint in and of itself (Mazzaferri & Kloos 2001). Extending RFS spares patients morbidity and anxiety, an especially important benefit in children and adolescents, who are in their psychologically formative years. Further, with sufficient follow-up, avoiding recurrence may decrease mortality. In one study (Landau et al. 2000), the risk of death was significantly higher in recurrent patients (hazard ratio 9.9, 95% CI, 0.98100.0, P=0.02), even though their median survival was 30 years. Additionally, anecdotal reports exist of patients diagnosed in childhood succumbing to recurrent DTC 2235 years later (Tubiana et al. 1985). Lastly, extending RFS may lessen medical resource consumption, e.g., avoid re-operation for local recurrence (Harness et al. 1992).
When formulating primary treatment strategies for juvenile DTC patients, the first question that arises is whether distinct strategies are required from those employed in adult patients (Ringel & Levine 2003). We, and many others (Zimmerman et al. 1988, Harach & Williams 1995, Dottorini et al. 1997, Newman et al. 1998, Hung & Sarlis 2002, Reiners 2003) believe that the answer is affirmative, particularly in patients <10 or<15 years old.
There are, we feel, two main rationales for distinct pediatric strategies. First, as discussed above, childhood DTC appears to behave differently from the adult disease: its large tumors, frequent metastasis, responsiveness to radioiodine, and above all, propensity for recurrence should influence decision-making (Newman 1993, Hung & Sarlis 2002, Orsenigo et al. 2003). Second, juvenile patients of course are, unlike adults, physically and psychologically developing and if cured, will have longer survival. Therefore both short- and long-term safety are extremely important considerations, and the clinician should, as always, aim to apply the minimum interventions likely to achieve treatment goals.
In formulating distinct pediatric treatment strategies, a conventional evidence-based approach is not possible. Given DTCs frequent curability and relatively low mortality, large sample sizes in a relatively rare disease and an unusually long follow-up would be required to detect intergroup differences in overall survival. Therefore no randomized, prospective studies in either pediatric or adult DTC have compared the effect of different therapeutic options on this endpoint, or, for that matter, with respect to RFS (Dragoiescu et al. 2003).
Three main sources of published guidance are available for devising pediatric primary treatment strategies: 1) the adult DTC outcomes literature (Schlumberger et al. 1986, DeGroot et al. 1990, 1994, Samaan et al. 1992, Mazzaferri & Jhiang 1994b, Sherman et al. 1998); 2) DTC treatment algorithms (Mazzaferri 1999, 2001a,b, Vini & Harmer 2002, Harris 2002, Phillips et al. 2003, Watkinson 2004 and other recent guidelines, among them EANM2003, AACE/ AAES 2001a and Polish Guidelines 2001b) based overwhelmingly on adult experience, and with few exceptions, not considering children separately; and, of greatest relevance, 3) the pediatric outcomes literature. Tables 2A
, B
summarize recent experience in children and young adults with DTC, published in the last 15 years in outcome studies reporting
15 patients. Several major papers of the late 1980s summarizing the largest centers earlier experience also are included (Schlumberger et al. 1987, La Quaglia et al. 1988, Zimmerman et al. 1988). Because it currently is likeliest to be seen in most clinical practices, sporadic pediatric DTC is emphasized and studies with >25% of patients with radiation-induced DTC (Tronko et al. 1999, Gow et al. 2003, Spinelli et al. 2004) have, with one exception (Harness et al. 1992) been excluded, as have those devoted only to distant metastatic cases (Vassilopoulou-Sellin et al. 1995, Brink et al. 2000, Reiners et al. 2002).
|
Nonetheless, some general comments may be made based on the recent juvenile DTC literature. First, the majority (~60%) of reported children and adolescents were treated with total or near-total thyroidectomy, while the policy towards radioiodine therapy is more varied (~50% use). However, few investigators favor less extensive surgery followed by radioiodine; postoperative 131I is given mostly by authors agreeing that both modalities improve final outcome. There is no clear relationship between treatment strategy and the recurrence rate, which averages about 25%. However, as seen in Fig. 2
, a trend towards less recurrence seems to emerge as the proportion of patients in a series receiving both total thyroidectomy and radioiodine ablation increases.
|
Less extensive surgery and omission of radioiodine ablation have been supported by the analysis of Newman et al. (1998) of determinants of DTC progression in an American multi-institutional cohort of 329 patients diagnosed when <21 years old. Progression- free survival did not differ significantly in relation to the extent of surgery or use of radioiodine ablation, while complications were more frequent after extensive operations (also van Santen et al. 2004). However, total thyroidectomy was more often applied to laterstage patients, calling into question the claim of no benefit from more intensive treatment. In addition, the inclusion of a substantial number of patients of age 1821 years, in whom the prognosis is usually excellent, might influence their conclusions.
The conservative primary treatment strategy entails so-called stage-oriented, risk-based algorithms (Newman et al. 1998, Powers et al. 2003b), which are widely accepted in adult DTC. Regarding radioiodine ablation, advocates of the conservative approach propose that beyond patients with functional distant metastases, the procedure be restricted to selected high-risk patients (Wartofsky et al. 1998). Implementing this algorithm is, however, complicated by the lack of consensus on the definition of high-risk patients, excluding the relatively rare stage IV cases at presentation. The numerous staging systems do not solve the problem (Sherman et al. 1998, Voutilainen et al. 2003), especially as the majority are based on overall survival rather than the much more appropriate endpoint of RFS (Mazzaferri & Massoll 2002). Staging is especially vexing in children, who have a high recurrence risk but very good overall survival. Based on the frequent extrathyroidal invasion, lymph node metastases and distant metastases, and above all, on the recurrence likelihood, most children should be included in the high-risk group, while because of good overall survival, most staging systems classify them as stage I, and only as stage II when they have distant metastases.
The main arguments favoring intensive primary treatment are its significant associations with improved RFS in many studies, especially those with longer follow-up (Tables 2A
, B
). For example, with respect to radioiodine ablation in children, a recent paper based on a large group of patients (n=60) is very conclusive on the procedures recurrence-related benefits. In univariate analysis, Chow et al. (2004a) demonstrated that local DTC relapse was reduced in children from 42.0 to 6.3% when 131I was administered postoperatively (P=0.001). Ten-year locoregional failure-free survival in children without distant metastases at diagnosis was 86.5% with, vs 71.9% without ablation (P=0.04). The distant failure-free rate was also reduced with adjuvant radioiodine: 100% vs 94%, albeit this difference did not reach significance. In addition, our own previously mentioned multivariate analysis of a large pediatric series found that ablation significantly reduced recurrence risk in both the thyroid bed and neck lymph nodes, independent of the influence of total thyroidectomy or adequate lymph node resection (Handkiewicz-Junak D, Wloch J, Roskosz J,Krajewska J, Wróbel A, Kukulska A, Puch Z, Wygoda Z & Jarz
b B, unpublished observations); thus, adjuvant radioiodine had an additive benefit to that of extensive surgery. The results of Chow et al. (2004a) and our group echo those of the recent meta-analysis of remnant ablation outcomes inDTC patients of all ages, which determined that this intervention reduced locoregional and distant recurrence risk (Sawka et al. 2004).
| Radioiodine treatment of metastatic DTC |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Both clinical experience and theoretical considerations indicate that response relates to tumor dimensions. Radioiodine treatment usually completely eradicates tumor deposits, especially when their diameter is
1 cm (Schlumberger et al. 1986, 1996a, Reynolds & Robbins 1997, Hindie et al. 2003). However, Monte Carlo simulations suggest that when tumor diameter is very small, especially <0.1mm, therapeutic results may be distinctly poorer, as >90% of ionizing energy emitted during 131I decay will be absorbed outside the tumor focus (the maximal range of beta particles is 2.4mm) (Reynolds & Robbins 1997, Maxon 1999). A 0.1mm lesion will receive only 8.6% of the radioactivity dose received by a 5mm lesion (Van Nostrand et al. 2002). This phenomenon may contribute to the failure of complete remission seen in some children withmetastatic DTC detected only by post-therapy scan.
Pediatric metastatic DTC appears to be more radioiodine-sensitive than adult disease, resulting in better survival in children. In publications to date, this modality achieved complete remission in the majority of children with lung metastases (Schlumberger et al. 1986, 1987, Vassilopoulou-Sellin et al. 1993, Sisson et al. 1996) and even partial responders rarely subsequently progressed (Brink et al. 2000, Jarzab et al. 2000, Reiners et al. 2003). Over a 20-year follow-up, La Quaglia et al. (1988) observed few if any cause-specific deaths in pediatric patients with lung metastases, which contrasts favorably with the 3060% 10-year mortality rate in their adult counterparts (Samaan et al. 1992, Casara et al. 1993a, Pacini et al. 1994a, Schlumberger et al. 1996a).
However, deeper inspection of the published data leads to the conclusions that long survival in radioiodine- treated children with DTC lung metastases is often unaccompanied by complete remission, and that persistent or recurrent disease can be lethal (Vassilopoulou-Sellin et al. 1998, Vassilopoulou-Sellin 2001). La Quaglia et al. (1988) noted a 31% locoregional or lung progression rate after a median 10-year follow-up among children given radioiodine for DTC lung metastases. In another large series, Reiners et al. (2002) noted complete remission in only 27% of children (26/95) with radiation-induced DTC, while elevated Tg levels persisted despite scintigraphic remission, albeit without clinical progression, in 37% (35/95). Other investigators (La Quaglia et al. 2000, Vassilopoulou-Sellin 2001), and we, have found similarly high prevalence of persistent disease in pediatric patients administered 131I for DTC lung metastases. In one series, such persistent disease caused six deaths at ages 1052 years among 112 patients (Vassilopoulou-Sellin 2001). The implication is that clinicians should avoid under-treatment of children with pulmonary DTC, notwithstanding justified optimism over their general prognosis. Hence repeated treatments are often appropriate to optimize response in children with lung foci.
It clearly would be desirable to have prospective evidence that children with DTC lung metastases have longer survival, better pulmonary function, or both with than without radioiodine. Unfortunately, lung function is only rarely determined in these patients (Ceccarelli et al. 1988, Samuel et al. 1998). Nonetheless, the survival and even response data described above do not in our opinion admit omitting 131I treatment of functional lung metastases, even if anecdotal observations exist of very long survival in a few untreated affected children (Brink et al. 2000).
A common dilemma over the indication for radioiodine treatment arises when serum Tg levels are elevated, but the patient remains asymptomatic and all available imaging procedures have failed to localize the putative disease foci (Schlumberger et al. 1997, van Tol et al. 2003). This situation occurs in 1015% of DTC patients, children included, and with respect to adults, has occasioned very intense controversy (McDougall 1997, Fatourechi et al. 2002, Britton et al. 2003). Koh et al. (2003) recently compared two non-randomized groups of adults with elevated serum Tg but no abnormal foci of 131I uptake on diagnostic WBS, one group (n=28) given 131I treatment and the other (n=32) untreated. Changes in Tg level did not significantly differ between groups. Nevertheless, the authors supported radioiodine administration in these cases, stressing that foci of uptake were localized by post-therapy WBS in 43% of treated patients. Of greater interest in our view, the post-therapy WBS indicated further 131I therapy in only two cases (7%), in both of whom multiple lung metastases were detected; in the majority of other patients, this scan served merely to detect locoregional foci to be treated surgically. We have noted that a rising serum Tg level in children is most often the first sign of lymph node recurrence, which requires operation, not radioiodine. Attempts should be made to localize such recurrences by sonography and fine needle biopsy before turning to 131I treatment (Antonelli et al. 2003).
Our experience in adults speaks for limited use of radioiodine treatment in asymptomatic hyperthyroglobulinemia if post-therapy WBS is negative or shows only operable foci, we discontinue 131I. We do likewise when scintigraphic remission is obtained, serum Tg decreases or even normalizes, but the lungs remain radiographically abnormal. In absence of size increase, no sure criterion exists to distinguish metastases that have lost functionality due to DTC progression from those that presumably have been rendered metabolically inactive and clinically stable by radioiodine therapy. The strategy of discontinuing 131I treatment of lesions in which proliferation potential has been destroyed seems particularly important in children, in whom every unreasonable use of ionizing radiation should be avoided. Additional reasons for this strategy are the potential for the radioisotope to induce de-differentiation or for TSH increase to accelerate tumor growth. These issues have been raised mostly regarding DTC patients >45 years of age, but may well affect younger patients (Sera et al. 2000). However, Schaap et al. (2002), who specifically addressed this question, reported no such disadvantageous effects in adult patients.
| Endogenous and recombinant human TSH in radioiodine therapy |
|---|
|
|
|---|
25 or 30 mIU/l are considered necessary to provide sufficient TSH stimulation (Schlumberger 1998). Until recently, TSH stimulation usually has been attained by a 45 week T4 withdrawal, often with a mixed regime including 23 weeks of triiodothyronine (T3) and then 2 weeks of full thyroid hormone cessation. However, such protocols often lead to symptomatic hypothyroidism resulting in debilitation, discomfort, inability to perform activities of daily living, missed or unproductive work or study (Dow et al. 1997, Nijhuis et al. 1999, Haugen et al. 2002), or decreased compliance with follow-up protocols (Cohen et al. 2004b). In addition, prolonged hypothyroidism is related to risks of exacerbating concomitant illnesses or stimulating tumor growth, sometimes causing complications in confined anatomical spaces (Jarzab et al. 2003, Luster et al. 2005).
Use of rhTSH to provide TSH stimulation exogenously avoids many of these drawbacks (Haugen et al. 2002, Pacini et al. 2004). Based on multicenter prospective studies (Ladenson et al. 1997, Haugen et al. 1999, Haugen et al. 2002, Pacini et al. 2004), rhTSH was licensed in Europe as an adjunct to diagnostic WBS or serum Tg testing in 1999 and to radioiodine ablation in early 2005, in the US, it is licensed only in the diagnostic setting. However, in both settings, the licensing covers only adults (age
18 years), thus rhTSH administration in children is off-label. This is probably due to the lack of pediatric patients in reported series (Luster et al. 2003) to our knowledge, the youngest published rhTSH ablation patient was age 17 years. In adults, the recommended regimen is two consecutive daily intramuscular injections of 0.9 mg, followed by the ablative radioiodine activity 24 h later.
The multicenter ablation study (Pacini et al. 2004, Ladenson et al. 2004) randomized 30 patients to conventional thyroid hormone withdrawal and 33 to rhTSH administration before radioiodine ablation with an activity of 3.7GBq (100 mCi). One hundred percent of both groups had successful ablation defined by thyroid bed uptake <0.1% on an rhTSH-aided diagnostic WBS ~8 months later, while 96% of evaluable rhTSH patients and 86% of evaluable withdrawal patients had successful ablation defined as rhTSH-stimulated Tg <2 ng/ml at the same time. The rhTSH group had significantly fewer hypothyroid symptoms and better quality of life, as measured by the Billewicz scoring system and Short Form-36 instrument respectively.
In addition to the multicenter study, at least 180 patients have received rhTSH-aided ablation in open-label studies, some 140 while on thyroid hormone (Luster et al. 2005). In this experience, rhTSH-aided ablation using 131I activities
3.7GBq (100 mCi) has been overwhelmingly successful, however, results have been more mixed when 1.11 GBq (30 mCi) activities were employed. A prospective study at the University of Pisa (Pacini et al. 2002) found significantly lower ablation success rates in the rhTSH group than in the withdrawal or withdrawal+rhTSH groups (54% vs 84% vs 79% respectively, P<0.01, rhTSH vs other groups). Success was defined as absence of visible thyroid bed uptake on a withdrawal-aided diagnostic WBS 610 months after the procedure. When success was defined as absent uptake or undetectable serum Tg, the success rates were 74% in the rhTSH group, 88% in the withdrawal group, and 95% in the withdrawal+rhTSH group (significance not reported). The results of the Pisa study may have been influenced by the fact that the study design included uptake measurements. Therefore the rhTSH groups received radioiodine 48 or 72 h after the last rhTSH injection, when serum TSH levels were declining rapidly, instead of at 24 h after the last injection (Luster et al. 2005).
Although not approved by European or American regulatory authorities for that purpose, rhTSH also may be considered as an adjunct to radioiodine treatment of local and, especially, metastatic DTC (Jarzab et al. 2003, Luster et al. 2005). The rhTSH-aided treatment experience published to date encompasses at least 216 patients and 266 courses, including individual activities from 119 GBq (27515 mCi) and up to 6 courses (Luster et al. 2005). The bulk of these patients have been elderly, and only a very few juvenile patients, the youngest, to our knowledge, age 14 years, have been reported.
We have some experience with rhTSH-aided radioiodine therapy in children with DTC, as to date, we have conducted 11 therapies in six patients<18 years old (range 616 years, mean 13 years) after rhTSH administration. Four children received rhTSH-aided therapy once, and two, multiple times (two and five courses respectively). Indications for rhTSH were very severe hypothyroidism on previous withdrawal, suspected central nervous system metastases, or desire to decrease the whole-body radiation dose in one course each, and desire to avoid advanced DTC progression due to protracted endogenous TSH stimulation in the other courses.
rhTSH dosing was not adjusted for body weight or surface area, although some reports indicate this might be appropriate (Vitale 2003). Serum TSH levels peaked on day 3, when radioiodine was administered, and averaged 200±66 mIU/l (range 128289 mIU/l) then, falling to a mean 4.4±2.7 mIU/l on day 6. Free T3 and free T4 levels remained stable and a nearly ten-fold rise in serum Tg was observed on average, from 35.3 ng/ml (range, 0.2279 ng/ml) immediately before rhTSH administration to 312.4 ng/ml (range, 0.31080 ng/ml) on day 6.
Two of the six patients received rhTSH-aided radioiodine therapy primarily for thyroid remnant ablation. In one of the two, brain metastases were suspected at the time of primary treatment, but excluded in further observation. The second patient exhibited not only thyroid bed but also mediastinal radioiodine uptake on post-therapy scan and was subsequently retreated on withdrawal. Both are now in remission.
The remaining four children were treated for pulmonary metastases, in one case accompanied by a mediastinal lymph node lesion. The post-therapy scan showed radioiodine uptake in metastatic lesions in three of the four, in one case, however, only after experimental retinoic acid pretreatment. This was a very rare instance of primarily non-functional lung metastases occurring in a young patient (Jarzab et al. 2003), in whom no progression has been observed post therapy. Two patients responded with distinct regression of metastatic foci. The fourth patient exhibited no radioiodine uptake on the post-therapy WBS which, in view of other examinations (serum Tg, chest CT) was interpreted as a proof of complete remission obtained by previous withdrawal-aided treatment.
No side effects were noted during the 11 courses of rhTSH-aided radioiodine therapy at our center, with the exception of a mild, transient skin rash seen in a patient who received her second rhTSH course. In the published experience, rhTSH also has generally been safe, with usually mildmoderate transient nausea or headache the most common side effects (
10% incidence). However, a potential issue with any form of TSH elevation in patients with known or suspected lesions in confined spaces is the possibility of transient edematous or hemorrhagic tumor expansion or tumor growth and resultant compressive neurological, respiratory or other clinical complications (Vargas et al. 1999, Goffman et al. 2003, Powers et al. 2003a). Thus in such patients, glucocorticoid administration and caution are recommended when TSH elevation is induced. Particular care should be taken in patients with known or suspected central nervous system or spinal metastases or bulky neck lesions impairing poor pulmonary reserve. In addition, patients with osseous lesions may suffer transient bone pain exacerbation, possibly due to tumor swelling (Lippi et al. 2001, Jarzab et al. 2003).
A potential benefit of rhTSH stimulation of radioiodine therapy is the decreased radiation burden to healthy tissues, due at least in part to better kidney function and twice as fast renal radioiodine clearance when patients remain euthyroid (Park et al. 1996, Ladenson et al. 1997). In the multicenter ablation study, patients given rhTSH had a one-third lower blood radiation dose than those undergoing withdrawal (Pacini et al. 2004); other investigators have reported similar observations (de Keizer et al. 2004). This safety benefit will be especially important in children. Simultaneously, any potential diminished efficacy because of a decreased pool of circulating radioiodine available for uptake by healthy or malignant thyroid cells may be less important in children due to the relatively high radioiodine sensitivity of their DTC cells (Reynolds & Robbins 1997, Hung & Sarlis 2002).
A potential issue regarding rhTSH-aided radioiodine therapy is possible iodine contamination from continued thyroid hormone, the subject of recent speculation (Massin et al. 1984, de Keizer et al. 2004). To avoid this possibility, a small study (Barbaro et al. 2003) used a 4-day mini-withdrawal around administration of 30 mCi of 131I. The study found that a rhTSH+mini-withdrawal group (n=16) had a numerically higher rate of ablation success, determined by rhTSH-aided diagnostic WBS and serum Tg testing 1 year after the procedure, than did a conventional withdrawal group (n=24) (88 vs 75%). No hypothyroidism would be expected to develop during such a short withdrawal.