HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS		QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced] Author: Keyword(s): Year:  Vol:  Page:

This Article Abstract Full Text (PDF) Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Services Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in Web of Science Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Download to citation manager Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Web of Science (14) Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Serra, R Articles by Crowley, M R Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by Serra, R Articles by Crowley, M R

Department of Cell Biology, University of Alabama at Birmingham, 1918 University Boulevard, Birmingham, AL 35294-0005, USA

(Requests for offprints should be addressed to R Serra; Email: rserra{at}uab.edu)

(Present address of M R Crowley is Department of Genetics, University of Alabama, Birmingham, 720 20^th Street South, Birmingham, AL 35294-0024, USA)

	Abstract

Top Abstract Introduction Mouse models of TGF-ß... Mouse models of TGF-ß... Summary References

 
It is now recognized that transforming growth factor ß (TGF-ß) is an important factor that regulates normal breast development as well as breast cancer. Genetically engineered mouse models have been used to determine the role and mechanism of TGF-ß action in normal development and diseases of the breast. Using these models, it has been determined that TGF-ß regulates many steps of normal mammary gland development including branching morphogenesis, functional differentiation, cell-lineage decisions, and involution. Effects of TGF-ß on normal development are mediated through signaling in both the epithelial and stromal compartments. In cancer, mouse models have indicated that TGF-ß has biphasic effects on tumor progression, acting as a tumor suppressor in early stages of cancer and promoting invasion and metastasis at later stages. In addition, TGF-ß may play a role in tumor progression through effects on the microenvironment. Recently, experiments in several mouse models have suggested that antagonism of TGF-ß signaling may provide a therapeutic target for late-stage breast cancer, blocking metastasis without detrimental side effects. In the future, genetically altered mice will be used to establish models of human breast disease providing opportunities to test strategies for disease prevention and treatment.

	Introduction

Top Abstract Introduction Mouse models of TGF-ß... Mouse models of TGF-ß... Summary References

 
Development of the mouse mammary gland begins at embryonic day 11 (E11) as an invagination of the ectoderm into the underlying ventral mesoderm (Imagawa et al. 1994, Hennighausen & Robinson 2001, Silberstein 2001, Parmar & Cunha 2004). A prominent mammary bud surrounded by condensed mammary mesenchyme is evident by E15. The mammary bud elongates slightly into the primitive mammary fat pad resulting in a mammary anlagen that consists of 12–15 branches at birth. The anlagen grows isometrically with the mouse until puberty at which time ovarian hormones stimulate the formation of large terminal end buds (TEBs) that rapidly invade the fat pad. Eventually, the TEBs reach the limits of the fat pad and regress. The adult female mammary gland then undergoes limited rounds of proliferation, differentiation, and apoptosis in response to hormonal changes of the estrus cycle. Pregnancy induces the differentiation of alveolar milk producing cells and lobuloalveolar structures along the existing ductal tree that eventually fill the fat pad with epithelium. Lactation signals a fully functional mammary gland and the differentiated cells are capable of producing and secreting milk. After weaning, milk stasis results in a process called involution. Involution is a two-step process that first involves programmed cell death of the milk-producing cells followed by extensive matrix remodeling, returning the mammary gland to a quiescent state. Many of the highly orchestrated biological processes that occur during the cycle of normal mammary gland development, including cell growth, invasion, differentiation, and apoptosis, are deregulated during the formation and progression of mammary cancer.

The transforming growth factor ß (TGF-ß) superfamily is recognized as a large and evolutionarily conserved family of secreted multifunctional peptides involved in regulating almost every aspect of cellular behavior (Miller et al. 1990, Roberts & Sporn 1990, Kingsley 1994, Massague et al. 2000). TGF-ß is the prototype for this large peptide family. Members of the superfamily include three isoforms of TGF-ß (TGF-ß1, TGF-ß2, and TGF-ß3): the activins and inhibins; the growth and differentiation factors (GDFs); and the bone morphogenetic proteins (BMPs). TGF-ß is first synthesized as a precursor protein with a signal sequence and a large prodomain (Pircher et al. 1986). TGF-ß is secreted in an inactive, latent form consisting of a 25 kDa mature peptide in a non-covalent association with the N-terminal prodomain of the precursor protein (latency-associated peptide; Wakefield et al. 1989). Activation of the latent form of TGF-ß may be a major regulatory step in controlling TGF-ß function in vivo (Barcellos-Hoff 1996, Murphy-Ullrich & Poczatek 2000, Koli et al. 2001). A constitutively active form of TGF-ß can be produced by mutations in cysteine residues 223 and 225 (Tgfb^223/225) that abrogate the ability of latency-associated peptide to associate with the mature peptide (Brunner et al. 1989).

TGF-ß signals through a heterotetrameric receptor complex composed of type I (TßRI) and type II (TßRII) serine threonine kinases (Fig. 1; Derynck 1994, Ten Dijke et al. 1996, Massague 1998b). TGF-ß ligand binds to TßRII on the cell surface and recruits TßRI into the heterotetrameric complex (Wrana et al. 1994). TßRII, a constitutively active kinase, phosphorylates and activates the kinase function of TßRI. Downstream substrates of TßRI transduce the signal to the nucleus. The most well-characterized TGF-ß signaling molecules are the Smads (Derynck & Zhang 1996, Massague 1998a, Massague & Wotton 2000, Wrana & Attisano 2000). Receptor-associated Smads (R-Smads) interact with and are directly phosphorylated by TßRI. Phosphorylated R-Smads can associate with Smad4, translocate to the nucleus, and regulate transcription either alone or in combination with transcriptional co-activators and co-repressors from other signaling cascades. In this way TGF-ß signaling is integrated with signaling from other growth factors (Zhang & Derynck 1999, Attisano & Wrana 2000, Massague & Chen 2000). Specific R-Smads transduce distinct signals for members of the TGF-ß superfamily. Smad2 and Smad3 mediate signaling by TGF-ß and activin whereas Smad1, Smad5, and Smad8 mediate BMP signaling. Inhibitory Smads (I-Smads), Smad6 and Smad7, have also been identified (Hayashi et al. 1997, Hata et al. 1998). TGF-ß receptors and Smads have been identified as potential tumor-suppressor genes in humans (Markowitz et al. 1995, Eppert et al. 1996, Hahn et al. 1996, Serra & Moses 1996, Massague et al. 2000, Derynck et al. 2001).

View larger version (25K): [in this window] [in a new window]   Figure 1 TGF-ß signaling pathway. TGF-ß binds to the type II receptor (II) on the cell surface. The type II receptor associates with and phosphorylates the type I receptor (I). The type I receptor phosphorylates receptor-associated Smads (R-Smads), which form a complex with Smad4, translocate to the nucleus, and act as transcription factors in combination with a variety of co-factors. Dominant-negative forms of the type II receptor lack kinase activity, preventing phosphorylation and activation of type I receptor and subsequent signaling events.

	Mouse models of TGF-ß in mammary development

Top Abstract Introduction Mouse models of TGF-ß... Mouse models of TGF-ß... Summary References

The expression pattern of TGF-ßs in the mouse suggested that TGF-ß could have roles in regulating branching morphogenesis, lactation, and involution. Experiments using mouse models have confirmed a role for TGF-ß in several steps of post-natal mammary gland development (Table 1; Fig. 2). The growth-suppressive effects of TGF-ß on the TEBs were first demonstrated by implantation of slow-release pellets containing active TGF-ß1 or TGF-ß3 in the mammary fat pad in front of the elongating ductal tree (Silberstein & Daniel 1987, Robinson et al. 1991). Whole-mount and histological analysis of control mammary glands implanted with pellets containing BSA showed large, multilayered TEBs with high rates of proliferation. In contrast, the TEBs in glands implanted with beads containing TGF-ß regressed and had proliferation rates similar to quiescent mature ducts (Silberstein & Daniel 1987, Robinson et al. 1991). The effects of TGF-ß were reversible. Transgenic mice that expressed the active form of TGF-ß in mammary epithelium under the control of the mouse mammary tumor virus (MMTV) promoter, MMTV-Tgfb1^223/225, demonstrated a hypoplastic mammary gland (Pierce et al. 1993). That is, the ductal epithelium was delayed in filling the fat pad and virtually devoid of side branches (Pierce et al. 1993). Proliferation rates were reduced in the mammary epithelium 2-fold at 7 weeks and 4-fold at 13 weeks in the transgenic gland compared with wild-type animals (Pierce et al. 1993). Conversely, mice heterozygous for a null allele of the TGF-ß1 gene (Tgfß1^+/–) have 10% of the TGF-ß1 protein observed in wild-type mice. Tgfß1^+/– mice demonstrated increased ductal extension through the fat pad and increased proliferation rates of both end-bud and ductal epithelium (Ewan et al. 2002). Mice with a dominant-negative interference of TßRII function also demonstrated increased ductal extension through the end bud (Crowley et al. 2005a). The data suggest that TGF-ß normally acts as an inhibitor of ductal elongation and branching. In contrast, mammary glands from Smad3-null mice demonstrated delayed ductal development and decreased side branching, most likely due to impaired ovarian function (Yang et al. 2002a). Post-natal development was normal in Smad3-null mice supplied with exogenous hormones, suggesting that signaling through Smad3 is not inherently necessary for normal mammary gland development.

View larger version (34K): [in this window] [in a new window]   Figure 2 Role of TGF-ß in mouse mammary development. TGF-ß inhibits progression of the end buds through the fat pad during puberty (A), regulates side branching via the stroma (B), prevents formation of alveolar buds and premature milk secretion (C), and promotes apoptosis during involution (D).

TGF-ß also regulates the development and survival of alveolar epithelium. Mice in which active TGF-ß is expressed under the control of the pregnancy-specific whey acid protein promoter (WAP-Tgfb1^223/225) displayed normal branching morphogenesis but the development of secretory epithelium was inhibited as a result of early apoptotic death in the differentiating alveolar cells (Jhappan et al. 1993, Kordon et al. 1995, Smith 1996). Similarly, transgenic mice expressing activated TßRI in the mammary epithelium (MMTV-TßRI^AAD) displayed deficiencies in late pregnancy due to increased apoptosis in alveolar structures (Siegel et al. 2003). Conversely, dominant-negative interference of TGF-ß signaling in the mammary epithelium (MMTV-DNIIR) resulted in precocious alveolar development; that is, virgin mice demonstrated an early pregnant phenotype (Bottinger et al. 1997, Gorska et al. 1998). Since the phenotype was not detected until the mice were 20 weeks of age, the alveolar development seen in these mice most likely required several rounds of proliferation and apoptosis that normally occur during the estrus cycle. Accumulation of alveolar cells could be a consequence of a failure of the cells to be removed through apoptosis (Gorska et al. 1998). Crosses of MMTV-DNIIR and prolactin-null mice indicated that precocious alveolar development in the MMTV-DNIIR mice was dependent on prolactin (Bailey et al. 2004). It was suggested that prolactin and TGF-ß co-ordinate alveolar development through careful regulation of apoptosis mediated by Akt. Inappropriate alveolar development has also been observed in mice expressing TßRII anitisense mRNA and in mice with Cre/Lox-mediated conditional deletion of TßRII in mammary epithelium (TßRII^MMTVKO) (Lenferink et al. 2003, Forrester et al. 2005). Likewise, the reduced levels of TGF-ß1 found in Tgfß1^+/– mice resulted in an increase in alveolar development during pregnancy (Ewan et al. 2002). The data together suggest that TGF-ß acts to limit inappropriate alveolar development and to regulate alveolar outgrowth during pregnancy. TGF-ß’s ability to regulate apoptosis is likely to be involved.

Post-lactational milk stasis triggers the first wave of apoptosis in secretory alveoli during involution. High levels of TGF-ß3 mRNA were detected in mammary gland 6 h after the induction of milk stasis (Nguyen & Pollard 2000). Transgenic mice that expressed TGF-ß3 under the control of the ß-lactoglobin promoter, which directs expression to alveolar epithelial cells in late pregnancy and throughout lactation, showed a significant increase in apoptotic cells at days 1 and 3 of involution compared with control, non-transgenic mice. Increased apoptosis was concomitant with Smad4 nuclear translocation and induction of phosphorylated Stat 3 (Nguyen & Pollard 2000). In addition, when mammary glands from TGF-ß3-null mice, which die a few days after birth, were transplanted into syngeneic wild-type hosts, a decrease in alveolar apoptosis compared with heterozygous or wild-type glands was observed during involution (Nguyen & Pollard 2000). Furthermore, dominant-negative interference of TßRII in mammary epithelium (MMTV-DNIIR) results in a delay in involution in response to weaning or sealing the duct (Gorska et al. 2003, Bailey et al. 2004). The levels of phosphorylated Akt and Forkhead transcription factor 01 (FKHR) were increased in MMTV-DNIIR mice compared with wild-type controls, suggesting that TGF-ß may act to restrain Akt and FKHR activity thereby promoting apoptosis during the initial stages of involution (Bailey et al. 2004). Together the results suggest that TGF-ß3 signaling through TßRII has a key role in the early phase of involution. TGF-ß3 may also play a role in re-organization of the extracellular matrix in the late stage of involution. Faure et al. (2000) determined that the primary site of TGF-ß3 synthesis in late involution was myoepithelial cells. Expression corresponded to sites of laminin deposition leading the authors to propose that TGF-ß3 was involved in stromal reorganization (Faure et al. 2000).

In addition to accelerated apoptosis in differentiating cells, mammary epithelial cells from WAP-Tgfb1^223/225 mice demonstrated another phenotype, early growth senescence as seen by a diminished capacity of epithelial cells to repopulate a cleared fat pad (Kordon et al. 1995). Recently, a new parity-induced population of epithelial cells was discovered in the mouse mammary gland (Wagner et al. 2002, Boulanger et al. 2005). This population of cells is derived from differentiating cells during pregnancy and was identified by marking WAP-expressing cells with a lacZ reporter gene using Cre/Lox recombinase technology. It was shown that lacZ-positive cells accumulated in the mammary gland after pregnancy but did not accumulate in nulliparous mice with normal estrus cycle. The lack of persistence of lacZ-positive cells in nulliparous mice suggested that cells that differentiated during estrus were removed, most likely through apoptosis as described above. In contrast, a population of cells induced during pregnancy were maintained and contributed to future rounds of differentiation. The parity-induced cell population was shown to be pluripotent and capable of self-renewal (Boulanger et al. 2005). Experiments with mice expressing activated TGF-ß1 in the Cre/Lox/Lac Z background suggested that TGF-ß1 limited the self-renewal capacity of this cell population. The discovery of the parity-induced population of cells indicates that not all differentiated cells are removed during involution and explains some of the biological differences between nulliparous and parous glands.

Recently, Smad4, a central mediator of TGF-ß signaling, was deleted in mammary gland epithelium using a Cre/Lox recombination strategy (Li et al. 2003). Early mammary gland development was normal; however, lack of Smad4 induced gradual increases in proliferation, alveolar differentiation, and transdifferentiation of mammary epithelium into squamous cells. Mice later developed mammary abscesses and squamous cell carcinoma. The results suggest a role for TGF-ß in regulating cell-fate decisions in the mammary gland. In addition, it has been documented that 7,12-dimethybenz(a)anthracene (DMBA) treatment in mice results in the formation of a heterogeneous group of tumors, the most common being those with squamous metaplasia or adenomyoepithelial character (Cardiff et al. 1988, Rehm 1990, Bottinger et al. 1997). When mice expressing a dominant-negative form of TßRII were treated with DMBA, alterations in TGF-ß signaling influenced the pathology of the tumors formed (Bottinger et al. 1997, Crowley M, Frost A, Chen D-T, Baffi M, Nicola T & Serra R, unpublished work). In wild-type mice, DMBA promoted the formation of adenomyoepitheliomas. This type of tumor was not detected in glands with altered TGF-ß signaling. Furthermore, staining for SMA and K14 was reduced or absent in glandular structures from transgenic tumors relative to wild-type tumors (Crowley M, Frost A, Chen D-T, Baffi M, Nicola T & Serra R, unpublished work). The data suggest that TGF-ß is also involved in the differentiation, maintenance, and/or transformation of myoepithelial cells.

	Mouse models of TGF-ß in breast cancer

Top Abstract Introduction Mouse models of TGF-ß... Mouse models of TGF-ß... Summary References

 
The growth-suppressive effects of TGF-ß on epithelial cells are well documented (Alexandrow & Moses 1995). Analysis of TßRI and TßRII genes in colon and gastric cancers with microsatellite instability (RER+, replication error) provided genetic evidence of a tumor-suppressor role for TGF-ß (Markowitz et al. 1995). In addition, several genes that encode TGF-ß signaling molecules, TßRI and TßRII, Smad2, Smad3, and Smad4, have been found mutated or deleted in a variety of human cancers (Markowitz et al. 1995, Serra & Moses 1996, Massague et al. 2000, Derynck et al. 2001). Furthermore, mRNA levels for TGF-ß signaling molecules are altered in many additional tumors. Mutations in the TGF-ß signaling pathway are rare in human breast cancer; however, loss of the TßRII has been documented by immunohistochemistry (Gobbi et al. 1999, 2000). Significant loss of TßRII immunoreactivity in epithelial hyperplasia lacking atypia (EHLA) was correlated with an approximate 4-fold increase in relative risk for developing invasive breast cancer (Gobbi et al. 1999). Additionally, loss of TßRII staining was inversely correlated with tumor grade, mitotic index, and clinical stage (Gobbi et al. 2000). Several studies using transgenic mice support a role for TGF-ß as a tumor suppressor in the mammary gland. Expression of transforming growth factor- (TGF-) in mouse mammary epithelial cells via the MMTV promoter resulted in ductal hyperplasia that progressed to carcinoma (Matsui et al. 1990). Co-expression of TGF-ß1 in the mammary epithelium of the MMTV-TGF mice significantly reduced the number of tumors that formed (Pierce et al. 1995). In addition, TGF-ß expression alone (MMTV-Tgfb1^223/225) inhibited mammary tumor formation in mice challenged with DMBA as compared with DMBA-treated wild-type controls (Pierce et al. 1995). In complimentary studies, dominant-negative interference of TßRII in mouse mammary epithelium (MMTV-DNIIR) increased the incidence and number of tumors that formed after treatment with DMBA (Bottinger et al. 1997). MMTV-DNIIR mice also developed spontaneous tumors with long latency (Gorska et al. 2003). Mice that express activated neu in the mammary epithelium (MMTV-neu) are a well-characterized model for mammary tumor development and progression (Muller et al. 1988). Mice develop adenocarcinomas that metastasize to the lung in a defined period of time. Mice in which the activated form of TßRI was expressed in the mammary epithelium of MMTV-neu mice developed fewer tumors with greater latency than the MMTV-neu controls (Siegel et al. 2003). Conversly, expression of a dominant-negative form of TßRII in MMTV-neu mice decreased the latency of tumor onset (Siegel et al. 2003). Conditional deletion of TßRII in mammary epithelium (TßRII^MMTVKO) also resulted in shortened tumor latency in the context of polyomavirus middle-T induced oncogenesis (Forrester et al. 2005). The data suggest TGF-ßs can act as tumor suppressors in breast cancer but the mechanisms are still not clear.

One proposed mechanism involves TGF-ß induced senescence in the mammary stem cell population (Kordon et al. 1995, Boulanger & Smith 2001). Innoculation of mammary glands with MMTV normally results in the development of hyperplastic alveolar nodules that presumably progress to form cancer in mice (Boulanger & Smith 2001). Introduction of MMTV into the mammary glands of 3–5-month-old WAP-Tgfb1^223/225 mice showed a decrease in tumor incidence (5.8%) compared with control mice (51.7%). Epithelial cells isolated from WAP-Tgfb1^223/225-expressing mammary glands also have a reduced capacity to repopulate cleared mammary fat pads compared with cells from wild-type littermates, suggesting premature senescence of stem cells in the TGF-ß-overexpressing tissue (Kordon et al. 1995). Recently, a parity-induced, pluripotent, self-renewing population of cells was discovered in the mammary gland (Wagner et al. 2002). TGF-ß also diminished the self-renewing capability of this cell population, raising the possibility that TGF-ß may induce premature senescence in stem cells, thereby reducing the number of target cells for development of cancer (Boulanger et al. 2005).

Although there is considerable evidence indicating TGF-ß functions as a tumor suppressor, there is also evidence pointing to a role for TGF-ß in promoting the progression of cancer and metastasis. Many breast cancers synthesize and secrete high levels of TGF-ß protein that can be detected in both the tumor cells and associated stroma (Teicher 2001). Clinical reports suggest that elevated levels of TGF-ß in tumor tissue or serum of cancer patients is associated with poor prognosis (Sheen-Chen et al. 2001, Teicher 2001, Ivanovic et al. 2003). It is thought that several variables, such as tumor stage, affect the way tumor cells respond to TGF-ß (Dumont & Arteaga 2000, Wakefield et al. 2000). Cells in early-stage tumors respond to TGF-ß with a growth-inhibitory response, suppressing further progression of the tumor. Later, as the tumor progresses, a different genetic or epigenetic environment exists and responsiveness to TGF-ß is altered so that the tumor-promoting activities of TGF-ß dominate. The tumor-promoting functions of TGF-ß can be a result of autocrine, paracrine, or tumor–host interactions (Dumont & Arteaga 2000). Cellular functions affected include regulation of extracellular matrix, angiogenesis, and immuno surveillance as well as epithelial to mesenchymal conversion.

The biphasic role of TGF-ß in mammary tumor formation in vivo can be seen in transgenic mice that express either activated or dominant-negative forms of the TGF-ß ligands and receptors. When expressed under the control of the MMTV promoter, an activated form of TßRI (MMTV-TßRI^AAV) suppressed Neu-induced tumorigenesis but promoted metastasis in the tumors that formed (Siegel et al. 2003). In contrast, expression of the activated ligand (MMTV-Tgfb1^223/225) did not affect tumor latency; however, tumors were more invasive and lung metastasis was more prevalent (Muraoka et al. 2003). Inducible expression of active TGF-ß1 (TetOp-Tgfb1^223/225) for as little as 2 weeks also increased lung metastasis in mice with polyomavirus middle-T-induced tumors, suggesting that TGF-ß can rapidly promote metastatic progression (Muraoka-Cook et al. 2004). Conversly, expression of a dominant-negative form of TßRII under the control of the MMTV promoter reduced the incident of metastasis in the MMTV-neu background (Siegel et al. 2003). Conditional deletion of TßRII in mammary epithelial cells using Cre/Lox recombination (TßRII^MMTVKO) also resulted in decreased latency in polyomavirus middle-T-induced tumors (Forrester et al. 2005). Unexpectedly, increased metastasis to the lung was observed in this mouse model (Forrester et al. 2005). Several possibilities exist for the discrepancy: incomplete deletion of TßRII in tumor cells, timing for the alterations in TGF-ß signaling, or cell-autonomous and non-cell-autonomous actions of TGF-ß. Tobin et al. (2002) showed increased lung metastasis of MDA-231 cells in response to TGF-ß irrespective of the expression of a dominant-negative receptor on the tumor cells, suggesting a role in metastasis that is paracrine-based. Nevertheless, the data suggest TGF-ß is an important factor in regulating invasion and metastasis, although the exact mechanism is not clear.

Whereas it has previously been established that normal development of the mammary ductal system requires signals generated from the stroma, only recently has evidence accumulated to suggest that the stroma and microenvironment directly influence the initiation, promotion, or progression of cancer (Noel & Foidart 1998, Tlsty 2001, Tlsty & Hein 2001, Tuxhorn et al. 2001, Wiseman & Werb 2002, Erickson & Barcellos-Hoff 2003). Desmoplasia, fibroblast proliferation in conjunction with remodeling of the extracellular matrix, is often observed in human breast cancers (Noel & Foidart 1998, Erickson & Barcellos-Hoff 2003). This altered stroma is also known as the reactive stroma and has some characteristics in common with granulation tissue found during wound repair (Tuxhorn et al. 2001). It has been proposed that TGF-ß expressed by cancer cells stimulates the formation of reactive stroma. TGF-ß induces myo-fibroblast differentiation, extracellular matrix remodeling, and angiogenesis, properties of the reactive stroma that could promote the progression of tumors (Tuxhorn et al. 2001). Recent experimental studies in mice have implicated TGF-ß signaling in the stroma as a regulator of tumor development. When epithelium-free mouse fat pads were exposed to gamma irradiation, tumor development was stimulated in a non-tumorigenic cell line, COMMA-D, suggesting that changes in the stromal environment contribute to neoplastic progression (Barcellos-Hoff & Ravani 2000). Before that, it was shown that gamma irradiation resulted in rapid remodeling of the extracellular matrix and activation of latent TGF-ß in the stroma (Barcellos-Hoff 1993, Barcellos-Hoff et al. 1994). Furthermore, neutralizing antibodies directed to TGF-ß suppressed matrix remodeling in response to irradiation, suggesting a role for activated TGF-ß and the remodeled extracellular matrix in neoplastic progression (Ehrhart et al. 1997). Subsequently, it was shown through conditional deletion of TßRII in fibroblasts via a FSP1-cre transgene (TßRII^FSP1KO) that TGF-ß signaling in the stroma modulates oncogenic potential of prostate and stomach epithelium (Bhowmick et al. 2004). Mammary cancer could not be investigated in this mouse model since the mice died at around 8 weeks of age. To access the role of TGF-ß signaling to the stroma in mammary cancer, co-cultures of polyomavirus middle-T-induced mammary carcinoma cells and TßRII-positive or TßRII-deleted (TßRII^FSP1KO) fibroblasts were transplanted under the kidney capsules of nude mice (Cheng et al. 2005). TßRII^FSP1KO fibroblasts promoted tumor cell growth and invasion, which correlated with increased activation of several tyrosine kinase receptors including c-Met. Furthermore, conditioned medium from TßRII^FSP1KO fibrobasts contained high levels of Hepatocyte Growth Factor (HGF) and other growth factors and inhibitors of the growth factors blocked increased cell growth and motility in response to the conditioned media. The results suggest that TGF-ß promotes mammary cancer via regulation of various growth factors in the stroma (Cheng et al. 2005). The studies together suggest that TGF-ß mediates changes in the stroma that contribute to neoplastic progression.

Since TGF-ß regulates invasion in mammary tumors, it has the potential to act as a therapeutic target in a clinical setting (Akhurst 2002). Clinically, tumors are generally identified at later stages of progression where the tumor-suppressive actions of TGF-ß have little effect. In this regard, the concept of using soluble antagonists of TGF-ß to block metastasis is appealing. It has been shown that intraperitoneal injection of a soluble chimeric protein composed of the extracellular portion of TßRII and the the Fc portion of IgG heavy chain (Fc:TßRII) blocks tumor metastasis in three different mouse models of breast cancer (Muraoka et al. 2002). Tumor cell motility and extravasation as well as matrix metalloproteinase activity were inhibited in the presence of Fc:TßRII. In addition, apoptosis in cancer cells was increased but alterations in tumor cell proliferation were not observed. Furthermore, vascular density within tumors was not affected by treatment with soluble Fc:TßRII. Transgenic mice that expressed Fc:TßRII under the control of the MMTV promoter were also resistant to metastasis compared with wild-type mice in both a tail vein metastasis assay and in crosses with MMTV-neu mice (Yang et al. 2002b). Most importantly, mice expressing Fc:TßRII did not demonstrate an increase in the formation of primary tumors and they did not demonstrate adverse side effects even though high levels of Fc:TßRII were detected in the serum. The data support the feasibility of using soluble receptors as injectable drugs in the treatment of breast cancer with few adverse effects.

	Summary

Top Abstract Introduction Mouse models of TGF-ß... Mouse models of TGF-ß... Summary References

 
Genetically engineered mice have been used to determine the role and mechanism of TGF-ß signaling in normal breast physiology and pathology. DNA-regulatory elements that direct the expression of activated TGF-ß ligands and receptors as well as dominant-negative forms of various signaling molecules to specific cell types and developmental stages within the mammary gland have lead to an understanding of how TGF-ß regulates spatial and temporal aspects of mammary gland development. Sophisticated transplantation techniques in combination with mouse transgenic and knockout models have permitted a discussion of the importance of stromal-epithelial interaction in both normal development and tumor progression. Recent advances using Cre/Lox technology in mice have allowed conditional deletion of genes in specific tissues at specific times, providing additional information regarding TGF-ß action in breast development and disease. This information is currently being used to develop strategies to combat breast cancer via the development of TGF-ß antagonists (Muraoka-Cook et al. 2005). In the future, these mouse models will allow further testing of additional cancer prevention and treatment strategies.

	Acknowledgements

 
R S is supported by NIH R01CA91974. M R C was supported by DMAD17-01-1-0201. The authors declare that there is no conflict of interest that would prejudice the impartiality of this scientific work.

	References

Top Abstract Introduction Mouse models of TGF-ß... Mouse models of TGF-ß... Summary References

 
Akhurst RJ 2002 TGF-beta antagonists: why suppress a tumor suppressor? Journal of Clinical Investigation 109 1533–1536.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]

Alexandrow MG & Moses HL 1995 Transforming growth factor ß and cell cycle regulation. Cancer Research 55 1452–1457.[Free Full Text]

Attisano L & Wrana JL 2000 Smads as transcriptional co-modulators. Current Opinion in Cell Biology 12 235–243.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]

Bailey JP, Nieport KM, Herbst MP, Srivastava S, Serra RA & Horseman ND 2004 Prolactin and transforming growth factor-beta signaling exert opposing effects on mammary gland morphogenesis, involution, and the Akt-forkhead pathway. Molecular Endocrinology 18 1171–1184.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Barcellos-Hoff MH 1993 Radiation-induced transforming growth factor ß and subsequent extracellular matrix reorganization in murine mammary gland. Cancer Research 53 3880–3886.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Barcellos-Hoff MH 1996 Latency and activation in the control of TGF-beta. Journal of Mammary Gland Biology and Neoplasia 1 353–363.[CrossRef][Medline]

Barcellos-Hoff MH & Ravani SA 2000 Irradiated mammary gland stroma promotes the expression of tumorigenic potential by unirradiated epithelial cells. Cancer Research 60 1254–1260.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Barcellos-Hoff MH, Derynck R, Tsang ML-S & Weatherbee JA 1994 Transforming growth factor-ß activation in irradiated murine mammary gland. Journal of Clinical Investigation 93 892–899.[Web of Science][Medline]

Bhowmick NA, Chytil A, Plieth D, Gorska AE, Dumont N, Shappell S, Washington MK, Neilson EG & Moses HL 2004 TGF-beta signaling in fibroblasts modulates the oncogenic potential of adjacent epithelia. Science 303 848–851.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Bottinger EP, Jakubczak JL, Haines DC, Bagnall K & Wakefield LM 1997 Transgenic mice overexpressing a dominant-negative mutant type II TGF-ß receptor show enhanced tumorigenesis in the mammary gland and lung in response to the carcinogen 7,12-dimethylbenz-[a]- anthracene. Cancer Research 57 5564–5570.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Boulanger CA & Smith GH 2001 Reducing mammary cancer risk through premature stem cell senescence. Oncogene 20 2264–2272.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]

Boulanger CA, Wagner KU & Smith GH 2005 Parityinduced mouse mammary epithelial cells are pluripotent, self-renewing and sensitive to TGF-beta1 expression. Oncogene 24 552–560.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]

Brunner AM, Marquardt H, Malacko AR, Lioubin MN & Purchio AF 1989 Site-directed mutagenesis of cysteine residues in the pro region of the transforming growth factor beta-1 precursor. Journal of Biological Chemistry 264 13660–13664.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Cardiff RD, Gumerlock PH, Soong MM, Dandekar S, Barry PA, Young LJ & Meyers FJ 1988 c-H-ras-1 expression in 7,12-dimethyl benzanthracene-induced Balb/c mouse mammary hyperplasias and their tumors. Oncogene 3 205–213.[Web of Science][Medline]

Cheng N, Bhowmick NA, Chytil A, Gorska AE, Brown KA, Muraoka R, Arteaga CL, Neilson EG, Hayward SW & Moses HL 2005 Loss of TGF-b type II receptor in fibroblasts promotes mammary carcinoma growth and invasion through upregulation of TGF-a, MSP-, and HGF-mediated signaling networks. Oncogene 24 5053–5068.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]

Couldrey C, Moitra J, Vinson C, Anver M, Nagashima K & Green J 2002 Adipose tissue: a vital in vivo role in mammary gland development but not differentiation. Developmental Dynamics 223 459–468.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]

Crowley MR, Head KL, Kwiatkowski DJ, Asch HL & Asch BB 2000 The mouse mammary gland requires the actinbinding protein gelsolin for proper ductal morphogenesis. Developmental Biology 225 407–423.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]

Crowley M, Bowtell DD & Serra R 2005a TGF-b, c-Cbl, and PDGFRa in the mouse mammary stroma. Developmental Biology 279 58–72.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]

Cunha GR, Young P, Hom YK, Cooke PS, Taylor JA & Lubahn DB 1997 Elucidation of a role for stromal steroid hormone receptors in mammary gland growth and development using tissue recombinants. Journal of Mammary Gland Biology and Neoplasia 2 393–402.[CrossRef][Medline]

Daniel CW, Robinson S & Silberstein GB 2001 The transforming growth factors beta in development and functional differentiation of the mouse mammary gland. Advanced Experimental Medical Biology 501 61–70.

Derynck R 1994 TGF-ß-receptor-mediated signaling. Trends in Biochemical Science 19 548–553.

Derynck R & Zhang Y 1996 Intracellular signaling: The MAD way to do it. Current Biology 6 1226–1229.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]

Derynck R, Akhurst RJ & Balmain A 2001 TGF-beta signaling in tumor suppression and cancer progression. Nature Genetics 29 117–129.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]

Dumont N & Arteaga CL 2000 Transforming growth factorbeta and breast cancer: Tumor promoting effects of transforming growth factor-beta. Breast Cancer Research 2 125–132.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]

Ehrhart EJ, Segarini P, Tsang ML, Carroll AG & Barcellos- Hoff MH 1997 Latent transforming growth factor beta1 activation in situ: quantitative and functional evidence after low-dose gamma-irradiation. FASEB Journal 11 991–1002.[Abstract]

Eppert K, Scherer SW, Ozcelik H, Pirone R, Hoodless P, Kim H, Tsui LC, Bapat B, Gallinger S, Andrulis IL et al. 1996 MADR2 maps to 18q21 and encodes a TGF-ß regulated MAD-related protein that is functionally mutated in colorectal carcinoma. Cell 86 543–552.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]

Erickson AC & Barcellos-Hoff MH 2003 The not-so innocent bystander: the microenvironment as a therapeutic target in cancer. Expert Opinion in Therapeutic Targets 7 71–88.

Ewan KB, Shyamala G, Ravani SA, Tang Y, Akhurst R, Wakefield L & Barcellos-Hoff MH 2002 Latent transforming growth factor-beta activation in mammary gland: regulation by ovarian hormones affects ductal and alveolar proliferation. American Journal of Pathology 160 2081–2093.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Faure E, Heisterkamp N, Groffen J & Kaartinen V 2000 Differential expression of TGF-beta isoforms during postlactational mammary gland involution. Cell Tissue Research 300 89–95.[Web of Science][Medline]

Forrester E, Chytil A, Bierie B, Aakre M, Gorska AE, Sharif- Afshar AR, Muller WJ & Moses HL 2005 Effect of conditional knockout of the type II TGF-beta receptor gene in mammary epithelia on mammary gland development and polyomavirus middle T antigen induced tumor formation and metastasis. Cancer Research 65 2296–2302.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Gobbi H, Dupont WD, Simpson JF, Plummer WD Jr, Schuyler PA, Olson SJ, Arteaga CL & Page DL 1999 Transforming growth factor-beta and breast cancer risk in women with mammary epithelial hyperplasia. Journal of the National Cancer Institute 91 2096–2101.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Gobbi H, Arteaga CL, Jensen RA, Simpson JF, Dupont WD, Olson SJ, Schuyler PA, Plummer WD Jr & Page DL 2000 Loss of expression of transforming growth factor beta type II receptor correlates with high tumour grade in human breast in-situ and invasive carcinomas. Histopathology 36 168–177.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]

Gorska AE, Joseph H, Derynck R, Moses HL & Serra R 1998 Dominant-negative interference of the transforming growth factor beta type II receptor in mammary epithelium results in alveolar hyperplasia and differentiation in virgin mice. Cell Growth and Differentiation 9 229–238.[Abstract]

Gorska AE, Jensen RA, Shyr Y, Aakre ME, Bhowmick NA & Moses HL 2003 Transgenic mice expressing a dominant-negative mutant type II transforming growth factor-beta receptor exhibit impaired mammary development and enhanced mammary tumor formation. American Journal of Pathology 163 1539–1549.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Gregoire FM 2001 Adipocyte differentiation: from fibroblast to endocrine cell. Experiments in Biological Medicine (Maywood) 226 997–1002.

Hahn SA, Schutte M, Hoque ATMS, Moskaluk CA, Da Costa LT, Rozenblum E, Weinstein CL, Fischer A, Yeo CJ, Hruban RH et al. 1996 DPC4, a candidate tumor suppressor gene at human chromosome 18q21.1. Science 271 350–353.[Abstract]

Hata A, Lagna G, Massague J & Hemmati-Brivanlou A 1998 Smad6 inhibits BMP/Smad1 signaling by specifically competing with the Smad4 tumor suppressor. Genes and Development 12 186–197.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Hayashi H, Abdollah S, Qiu Y, Cai J, Xu YY, Grinnell BW, Richardson MA, Topper JN, Gimbrone MA Jr, Wrana JL et al. 1997 The MAD-related protein Smad7 associates with the TGFbeta receptor and functions as an antagonist of TGFbeta signaling. Cell 89 1165–1173.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]

Hennighausen L & Robinson GW 2001 Signaling pathways in mammary gland development. Developments in Cell 1 467–475.

Imagawa W, Yang J, Guzman R & Satybrata N 1994 Control of mammary gland development. In The Physiology of Reproduction, 2nd edn, pp 1033–1063. Eds E Knobil & JD Neil. New York: Raven Press.

Ivanovic V, Todorovic-Rakovic N, Demajo M, Neskovic- Konstantinovic Z, Subota V, Ivanisevic-Milovanovic O & Nikolic-Vukosavljevic D 2003 Elevated plasma levels of transforming growth factor-beta 1 (TGF-beta 1) in patients with advanced breast cancer: association with disease progression. European Journal of Cancer 39 454–461.

Jhappan C, Geiser AG, Kordon EC, Bagheri D, Hennighausen L, Roberts AB, Smith GH & Merlino G 1993 Targeting expression of a transforming growth factor ß1 transgene to the pregnant mammary gland inhibits alveolar development and lactation. EMBO Journal 12 1835–1845.[Web of Science][Medline]

Joseph H, Gorska A, Sohn P, Moses HL & Serra R 1999 Overexpression of a kinase-defiecient transforming growth factor-ß type II receptor In mouse mammary stroma results in increased epithelial branching. Molecular Biology of the Cell 10 1221–1234.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Kingsley DM 1994 The TGF-ß superfamily: New members, new receptors, and new genetic tests of function in different organisms. Genes and Development 8 133–146.[Free Full Text]

Koli K, Saharinen J, Hyytiainen M, Penttinen C & Keski-Oja J 2001 Latency, activation, and binding proteins of TGF-beta. Microscopic Research Techniques 52 354–362.

Kordon EC, McKnight RA, Jhappan C, Hennighausen L, Merlino G & Smith GH 1995 Ectopic TGFß1 expression in the secretory mammary epithelium induces early senescence of the epithelial stem cell population. Developments in Biology 168 47–61.

Lenferink AE, Magoon J, Pepin MC, Guimond A & O’Connor-McCourt MD 2003 Expression of TGF-beta type II receptor antisense RNA impairs TGF-beta signaling in vitro and promotes mammary gland differentiation in vivo. International Journal of Cancer 107 919–928.[CrossRef][Medline]

Li W, Qiao W, Chen L, Xu X, Yang X, Li D, Li C, Brodie SG, Meguid MM, Hennighausen L et al. 2003 Squamous cell carcinoma and mammary abscess formation through squamous metaplasia in Smad4/Dpc4 conditional knockout mice. Development 130 6143–6153.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Markowitz S, Wang J, Myeroff L, Parsons R, Sun L, Lutterbaugh J, Fan RS, Zborowska E, Kinzler KW, Vogelstein B et al. 1995 Inactivation of the type II TGF-ß receptor in colon cancer cells with microsatellite instability. Science 268 1336–1338.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Massague J 1998a TGF-ß signal transduction. Annual Review of Biochemistry 67 753–791.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]

Massague J 1998b TGF-ß signal transduction. Annual Review of Biochemistry 67 753–791.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]

Massague J & Chen YG 2000 Controlling TGF-beta signaling. Genes & Development 14 627–644.[Free Full Text]

Massague J & Wotton D 2000 Transcriptional control by the TGF-beta/Smad signaling system. EMBO Journal 19 1745–1754.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]

Massague J, Blain SW & Lo RS 2000 TGFbeta signaling in growth control, cancer, and heritable disorders. Cell 103 295–309.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]

Matsui Y, Halter SA, Holt JT, Hogan BLM & Coffey RJ Jr 1990 Development of mammary hyperplasia and neoplasia in MMTV-TGFalpha transgenic mice. Cell 61 1147–1156.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]

Miller DA, Pelton RW, Derynck R & Moses HL 1990 Transforming growth factor-ß: A family of growth regulatory peptides. Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences 593 208–217.[Web of Science][Medline]

Muller WJ, Sinn E, Pattengale PK, Wallace R & Leder P 1988 Single-step induction of mammary adenocarcinoma in transgenic mice bearing the activated c-neu oncogene. Cell 54 105–115.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]

Muraoka RS, Dumont N, Ritter CA, Dugger TC, Brantley DM, Chen J, Easterly E, Roebuck LR, Ryan S, Gotwals PJ et al. 2002 Blockade of TGF-beta inhibits mammary tumor cell viability, migration, and metastases. Journal of Clinical Investigation 109 1551–1559.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]

Muraoka RS, Koh Y, Roebuck LR, Sanders ME, Brantley- Sieders D, Gorska AE, Moses HL & Arteaga CL 2003 Increased malignancy of Neu-induced mammary tumors overexpressing active transforming growth factor beta1. Molecular and Cell Biology 23 8691–8703.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Muraoka-Cook RS, Kurokawa H, Koh Y, Forbes JT, Roebuck LR, Barcellos-Hoff MH, Moody SE, Chodosh LA & Arteaga CL 2004 Conditional overexpression of active transforming growth factor beta1 in vivo accelerates metastases of transgenic mammary tumors. Cancer Research 64 9002–9011.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Muraoka-Cook RS, Dumont N & Arteaga CL 2005 Dual role of transforming growth factor beta in mammary tumorigenesis and metastatic progression. Clinical Cancer Research 11 937s–943s.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Murphy-Ullrich JE & Poczatek M 2000 Activation of latent TGF-beta by thrombospondin-1: mechanisms and physiology. Cytokine Growth Factor Reviews 11 59–69.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]

Neville MC, Medina D, Monks J & Hovey RC 1998 The mammary fat pad. Journal of the Mammary Gland Biology and Neoplasia 3 109–116.

Nguyen AV & Pollard JW 2000 Transforming growth factor beta3 induces cell death during the first stage of mammary gland involution. Development 127 3107–3118.[Abstract]

Noel A & Foidart JM 1998 The role of stroma in breast carcinoma growth in vivo. Journal of the Mammary Gland Biology and Neoplasia 3 215–225.

Parmar H & Cunha GR 2004 Epithelial-stromal interactions in the mouse and human mammary gland in vivo. Endocrine-related Cancer 11 437–458.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Pierce DF Jr, Johnson MD, Matsui Y, Robinson SD, Gold LI, Purchio AF, Daniel CW, Hogan BLM & Moses HL 1993 Inhibition of mammary duct development but not alveolar outgrowth during pregnancy in transgenic mice expressing active TGF-ß1. Genes and Development 7 2308–2317.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Pierce DF Jr, Gorska AE, Chytil A, Meise KS, Page DL, Coffey RJ Jr & Moses HL 1995 Mammary tumor suppression by transforming growth factor ß1 transgene expression. PNAS 92 4254–4258.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Pircher R, Jullien P & Lawrence DA 1986 Beta-transforming growth factor is stored in human blood platelets as a latent high molecular weight complex. Biochemical and Biophysical Research Communications 136 30–37.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]

Rehm S 1990 Chemically induced mammary gland adenomyoepitheliomas and myoepithelial carcinomas of mice. Immunohistochemical and ultrastructural features. American Journal of Pathology 136 575–584.[Abstract]

Roberts AB & Sporn MB 1990 The transforming growth factor-ßs. In Peptide Growth Factors and their Receptors, pp 419–472. Eds MB Sporn & AB Roberts. Heidelberg: Springer-Verlag.

Robinson GW & Hennighausen L 1997 Inhibin and activins regulate mammary epithelial cell differentiation through mesenchymal-epithelial interactions. Development 124 2701–2708.[Abstract]

Robinson SD, Silberstein GB, Roberts AB, Flanders KC & Daniel CW 1991 Regulated expression and growth inhibitory effects of transforming growth factor-ß isoforms in mouse mammary gland development. Development 113 867–878.[Abstract]

Serra R & Crowley M 2004 TGF-b in mammary gland development and breast cancer. Breast Disease 18 61–73.

Serra R & Moses HL 1996 Tumor suppressor genes in the TGF-ß signaling pathway? Nature Medicine 2 390–391.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]

Sheen-Chen SM, Chen HS, Sheen CW, Eng HL & Chen WJ 2001 Serum levels of transforming growth factor beta1 in patients with breast cancer. Archives in Surgery 136 937–940.

Siegel PM, Shu W, Cardiff RD, Muller WJ & Massague J 2003 Transforming growth factor {beta} signaling impairs Neu-induced mammary tumorigenesis while promoting pulmonary metastasis. PNAS 100 8430–8435.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Silberstein GB 2001 Postnatal mammary gland morphogenesis. Microscope Research Techniques 52 155–162.

Silberstein GB & Daniel CW 1987 Reversible inhibition of mammary gland growth by transforming growth factor-beta. Science 237 291–293.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Smith GH 1996 TGF-beta and functional differentiation. Journal of the Mammary Gland Biology and Neoplasia 1 343–352.

Strange R, Li F, Saurer S, Burkhardt A & Friis RR 1992 Apoptotic cell death and tissue remodelling during mouse mammary gland involution. Development 115 49–58.[Abstract]

Teicher BA 2001 Malignant cells, directors of the malignant process: role of transforming growth factor-beta. Cancer Metastasis Reviews 20 133–143.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]

Ten Dijke P, Miyazono K & Heldin C-H 1996 Signaling via hetero-oligomeric complexes of type I and type II serine treonine kinase receptors. Current Opinion in Cell Biology 8 139–145.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]

Tlsty TD 2001 Stromal cells can contribute oncogenic signals. Seminars in Cancer Biology 11 97–104.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]

Tlsty TD & Hein PW 2001 Know thy neighbor: stromal cells can contribute oncogenic signals. Current Opinion in Genetic Development 11 54–59.

Tobin SW, Douville K, Benbow U, Brinckerhoff CE, Memoli VA & Arrick BA 2002 Consequences of altered TGF-beta expression and responsiveness in breast cancer: evidence for autocrine and paracrine effects. Oncogene 21 108–118.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]

Tuxhorn JA, Ayala GE & Rowley DR 2001 Reactive stroma in prostate cancer progression. Journal of Urology 166 2472–2483.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]

Wagner KU, Boulanger CA, Henry MD, Sgagias M, Hennighausen L & Smith GH 2002 An adjunct mammary epithelial cell population in parous females: its role in functional adaptation and tissue renewal. Development 129 1377–1386.[Web of Science][Medline]

Wakefield LM, Smith DM, Broz S, Jackson M, Levinson AD & Sporn MB 1989 Recombinant TGF-beta 1 is synthesized as a two-component latent complex that shares some structural features with the native platelet latent TGF-beta 1 complex. Growth Factors 1 203–218.[Medline]

Wakefield LM, Yang YA & Dukhanina O 2000 Transforming growth factor-beta and breast cancer: Lessons learned from genetically altered mouse models. Breast Cancer Research 2 100–106.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]

Wiesen JF, Young P, Werb Z & Cunha GR 1999 Signaling through the stromal epidermal growth factor receptor is necessary for mammary ductal development. Development 126 335–344.[Abstract]

Wiseman BS & Werb Z 2002 Stromal effects on mammary gland development and breast cancer. Science 296 1046–1049.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Wrana JL & Attisano L 2000 The Smad pathway. Cytokine Growth Factor Reviews 11 5–13.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]

Wrana JL, Attisano L, Wieser R, Ventura F & Massagué J 1994 Mechanism of activation of the TGF-ß receptor. Nature 370 341–347.[CrossRef][Medline]

Yang YA, Tang B, Robinson G, Hennighausen L, Brodie SG, Deng CX & Wakefield LM 2002a Smad3 in the mammary epithelium has a nonredundant role in the induction of apoptosis, but not in the regulation of proliferation or differentiation by transforming growth factor-beta. Cell Growth & Differentiation 13 123–130.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Yang YA, Dukhanina O, Tang B, Mamura M, Letterio JJ, MacGregor J, Patel SC, Khozin S, Liu ZY, Green J et al. 2002b Lifetime exposure to a soluble TGF-beta antagonist protects mice against metastasis without adverse side effects. Journal of Clinical Investigation 109 1607–1615.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]

Zhang Y & Derynck R 1999 Regulation of Smad signalling by protein associations and signalling crosstalk. Trends in Cell Biology 9 274–279.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]

This article has been cited by other articles:

				S. M. Francis, J. Bergsied, C. E. Isaac, C. H. Coschi, A. L. Martens, C. V. Hojilla, S. Chakrabarti, G. E. DiMattia, R. Khoka, J. Y. J. Wang, et al. A Functional Connection between pRB and Transforming Growth Factor {beta} in Growth Inhibition and Mammary Gland Development Mol. Cell. Biol., August 15, 2009; 29(16): 4455 - 4466. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				W. V. Ingman and S. A. Robertson Mammary Gland Development in Transforming Growth Factor Beta1 Null Mutant Mice: Systemic and Epithelial Effects Biol Reprod, October 1, 2008; 79(4): 711 - 717. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				K. Roarty and R. Serra Wnt5a is required for proper mammary gland development and TGF-{beta}-mediated inhibition of ductal growth Development, November 1, 2007; 134(21): 3929 - 3939. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				S. Savas, I. W. Taylor, J. L. Wrana, and H. Ozcelik Functional nonsynonymous single nucleotide polymorphisms from the TGF-{beta} protein interaction network Physiol Genomics, April 24, 2007; 29(2): 109 - 117. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				N. Kirma, L. S. Hammes, Y.-G. Liu, H. B. Nair, P. T. Valente, S. Kumar, L. C. Flowers, and R. R. Tekmal Elevated Expression of the Oncogene c-fms and Its Ligand, the Macrophage Colony-Stimulating Factor-1, in Cervical Cancer and the Role of Transforming Growth Factor-{beta}1 in Inducing c-fms Expression Cancer Res., March 1, 2007; 67(5): 1918 - 1926. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				H. Koehler, D. Kofler, A. Hombach, and H. Abken CD28 Costimulation Overcomes Transforming Growth Factor-{beta}-Mediated Repression of Proliferation of Redirected Human CD4+ and CD8+ T Cells in an Antitumor Cell Attack Cancer Res., March 1, 2007; 67(5): 2265 - 2273. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

This Article Abstract Full Text (PDF) Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Services Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in Web of Science Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Download to citation manager Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Web of Science (14) Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Serra, R Articles by Crowley, M R Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by Serra, R Articles by Crowley, M R