ERC Society for Endocrinology Archive
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Endocrine-Related Cancer 15 (3) 701-720    DOI: 10.1677/ERC-07-0288
Copyright © 2008 by the Society for Endocrinology.
This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
ERC-07-0288v1
15/3/701    most recent
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Grozinsky-Glasberg, S.
Right arrow Articles by Grossman, A. B
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Grozinsky-Glasberg, S.
Right arrow Articles by Grossman, A. B

Somatostatin analogues in the control of neuroendocrine tumours: efficacy and mechanisms

Simona Grozinsky-Glasberg1,2, Ilan Shimon 2, Márta Korbonits1 and Ashley B Grossman1

1 Barts and the London School of Medicine, Centre for Endocrinology, University of London, London EC1M 6BQ, UK2 Institute of Endocrinology, Beilinson Hospital, Rabin Medical Center, and Sackler Faculty of Medicine, Tel Aviv 49100, Israel

(Correspondence should be addressed to A B Grossman, Department of Endocrinology, St Bartholomew's Hospital, 5th Floor King George V Building, West Smithfield, London EC1A 7BE, UK; Email: a.b.grossman{at}qmul.ac.uk)

Neuroendocrine tumours (NETs) represent a heterogeneous family of neoplasms, which may develop from different endocrine glands (such as the pituitary, the parathyroid or the neuroendocrine adrenal glands), endocrine islets (within the thyroid or pancreas) as well as from endocrine cells dispersed between exocrine cells throughout the digestive and respiratory tracts. The development of somatostatin analogues (SSA) as important diagnostic and treatment tools has revolutionised the clinical management of patients with NETs. However, although symptomatic relief and stabilisation of tumour growth for various periods of time are observed in many patients treated with SSA, tumour regression is rare. Possible mechanisms when this does occur include antagonism of local growth factor release and effects, probably including activation of tyrosine and serine–threonine phosphatases, and indirect effects via anti-angiogenesis. The development of new SSA, new drug combination therapies and chimaeric molecules should further improve the clinical management of these patients, as should a more complete understanding of their mode of action.







HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 2008 by the Society for Endocrinology.