|
|
||||||||
Julius Center for Health Sciences and Primary Care, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, The Netherlands
1 Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, New York University School of Medicine, New York, New York, USA
2 Epidemiology Unit, Cancer Research UK, University of Oxford, Richard Doll Building, Oxford, UK
3 National Cancer Institute, Milan, Italy
4 IARC International Agency for Research on Cancer (IARC-WHO), Lyon, France
5 Center for Nutrition and Health, National Institute of Public Health and the Environment, Bilthoven, The Netherlands
6 Department of Epidemiology, German Institute of Human Nutrition, Potsdam-Rehbrucke, Germany
7 Clinical Epidemiology, German Cancer Research Center, Heidelberg, Germany
8 Department of Clinical and Experimental Medicine, Federico II University, Naples, Italy
9 CPO-Piemonte, Torino, Italy
10 Molecular and Nutritional Epidemiology Unit, CSPO-Scientific Institute of Tuscany, Florence, Italy
11 Cancer Registry, Azienda Ospedaliera Civile M.P. Arezzo, Ragusa, Italy
12 Department of Hygiene and Epidemiology, School of Medicine, University of Athens, Athens, Greece
13 Public Health Division of Gipuzkoa, Health Department of the Basque Country, San Sebastian, Spain
14 Public Health Institute of Navarra, Pamplona, Spain
15 Epidemiology department (SERC), Catalan Institute of Oncology, Barcelona, Spain
16 Public Health and Health Planning Directorate, Asturias, Spain
17 Andalusian School of Public Health, Granada, Spain
18 Department of Epidemiology, Murcia Health Council, Murcia, Spain
19 MRC Dunn Human Nutrition Unit, Welcome Trust/MRC Building, Cambridge, UK
20 Clinical Gerontology Unit, Addenbrookes Hospital, Cambridge, UK
21 Inserm E3N-EPIC, Institute Gustave Roussy, Villejuif, France
22 Institute of Cancer Epidemiology, Danish Cancer Society, Copenhagen, Denmark
23 Department of Clinical Epidemiology, Aalborg Hospital, Aarhus University Hospital, Aalborg, Denmark
24 Institute of Community Medicine, University of Tromso, Tromso, Norway
25 Biomedical Sciences/Pathology and Department of Public Health and Clinical Medicine, University of Umeå, Umeå, Sweden
26 Department of Medicine, Lund University, Malmö, Sweden
27 Department of Epidemiology & Public Health, Faculty of Medicine, Imperial College London, St Marys Campufs, Norfolk Place, London, UK
(Requests for offprints should be addressed to R Kaaks who is now at Division of Cancer Epidemiology, German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Im Neuenheimer Feld 280, 69120 Heidelburg, Germany; Email: r.kaaks{at}dkfz-heidelberg.de)
We set out to study the relationship between circulating levels of IGF-I and its major binding protein (IGFBP-3) in relation to ovarian cancer risk. We conducted a case-control study nested within the European Prospective Investigation into Cancer and Nutrition. Levels of IGF-I and IGFBP-3 were measured in prediagnostic serum samples of 214 women who subsequently developed ovarian cancer, and 388 matched control subjects. Conditional logistic regression models were used to estimate relative risks of ovarian cancer by tertiles of IGF-I and IGFBP-3 levels. For all women, there was no association between the circulating IGF-I or IGFBP-3 levels and the risk of ovarian cancer. However, among women diagnosed with ovarian cancer aged 55 or younger, the relative risk was higher in the middle or top tertiles of serum IGF-I, when compared with women in the lowest tertile (odds ratios (OR) = 1.8 (95%CI 0.74.3) and OR = 2.4 (95%CI 0.96.4); Ptrend = 0.08) respectively. These results were adjusted for body mass index, previous hormone use, fertility problems, and parity. Restricting the analysis to women who were premenopausal at blood donation, relative risks for ovarian cancer diagnosed before age 55 were higher (OR = 5.1 (95%CI 1.518.2) and OR = 5.6 (95%CI 1.520.8) respectively, for second and third tertiles; Ptrend = 0.02). Adjustment for serum IGFBP-3 levels only slightly attenuated relative risk estimates. Relations between IGFBP-3 and ovarian cancer before age 55 were in the same direction as for IGF-I, but less strong and statistically not significant. In women aged over 55, there was no association between serum IGF-I or IGFBP-3 and ovarian cancer risk. Our results suggest that the circulating levels of IGF-I may play a potentially important role in the development of ovarian cancer in women of a pre- or perimenopausal age.
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
F. L. Crowe, T. J. Key, N. E. Allen, P. N. Appleby, A. Roddam, K. Overvad, H. Gronbaek, A. Tjonneland, J. Halkjaer, L. Dossus, et al. The Association between Diet and Serum Concentrations of IGF-I, IGFBP-1, IGFBP-2, and IGFBP-3 in the European Prospective Investigation into Cancer and Nutrition Cancer Epidemiol. Biomarkers Prev., May 1, 2009; 18(5): 1333 - 1340. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
L. J. Schouten, C. Rivera, D. J. Hunter, D. Spiegelman, H.-O. Adami, A. Arslan, W. L. Beeson, P. A. van den Brandt, J. E. Buring, A. R. Folsom, et al. Height, Body Mass Index, and Ovarian Cancer: A Pooled Analysis of 12 Cohort Studies Cancer Epidemiol. Biomarkers Prev., April 1, 2008; 17(4): 902 - 912. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
S. S. Tworoger, I-M. Lee, J. E. Buring, M. N. Pollak, and S. E. Hankinson Insulin-like Growth Factors and Ovarian Cancer Risk: A Nested Case-Control Study in Three Cohorts Cancer Epidemiol. Biomarkers Prev., August 1, 2007; 16(8): 1691 - 1695. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |