ERC
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Endocrine-Related Cancer 11 (3) 553 -561     DOI: 10.1677/erc.1.00810
Copyright © 2004 by the Society for Endocrinology
This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Web of Science (2)
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Zuetenhorst, J M
Right arrow Articles by Taal, B G
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Zuetenhorst, J M
Right arrow Articles by Taal, B G

Interferon and meta-iodobenzylguanidin combinations in the treatment of metastatic carcinoid tumours

J M Zuetenhorst, R A Valdes Olmos1, M Muller2, C A Hoefnagel1 and B G Taal

Department of Gastroenterology, Netherlands Cancer Institute/Antoni van Leeuwenhoek Hospital, Plesmanlaan 121, 1066 CX Amsterdam, The Netherlands
1 Department of Nuclear Medicine, Netherlands Cancer Institute/Antoni van Leeuwenhoek Hospital, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
2 Department of Psychology, Netherlands Cancer Institute/Antoni van Leeuwenhoek Hospital, Amsterdam, The Netherlands

(Requests for offprints should be addressed to J M Zuetenhorst; Email: j.zuetenhorst{at}nki.nl)

Interferon (IFN) and meta-iodobenzylguanidin (MIBG) are active in metastatic carcinoids. In a phase II study, we evaluated the effect upon diagnostic 131I-MIBG uptake and the clinical response of the combination.

131I-MIBG scintigraphy was performed prior to treatment, after 8 weeks of IFN and after unlabelled MIBG. The tumour over non-tumour (T/NT) ratios were quantitatively determined by comparing counts in the centre of the tumour (liver metastases) with those in an adjacent area of normal liver uptake (T/NT1) and with abdominal background area (T/NT2).

The T/NT1 ratio showed an increase of > 10% in only four out of 21 patients (19%) after IFN (p = 0.178) and significantly more often in nine out of 18 patients (50%) after unlabelled MIBG (p = 0.016). The absolute uptake in tumour deposits was also increased if compared with the abdominal background (T/NT2:23% increase after IFN and 83% increase after unlabelled MIBG). The combination produced 91% of patients with stable disease (using World Health Organisation criteria) at computed tomography scan and a biochemical response (a reduction of at least 50% in urinary 5-hydroxyindolacetic acid excretion) in 39%.

IFN-{alpha} did not significantly improve tumour retention of 131I-MIBG. In contrast, unlabelled MIBG significantly improved biodistribution and tumour uptake in 83%. A synergistic effect was not seen.







HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 2004 by the Society for Endocrinology.