Tamoxifen (TAM) provides an effective agent for treatment of hormone-dependent breast cancer but resistance uniformly ensues upon continued use. Additional studies are required to define more precisely the mechanisms involved in development of resistance. We conducted systematic experimental and clinical studies based on the hypothesis that tumors exposed to TAM long-term may develop resistance by becoming hypersensitive to its estrogenic effects. These investigations uncovered new features of the TAM resistance (TR) phenomenon and identified possible means for its prevention and/or elimination. Initially we confirmed that TR may be divided into two subtypes, primary and acquired resistance, and that these differ by certain important characteristics including the level of the possible involvement of adaptive and genetic components. Then we distinguished at least three consequent stages of this phenomenon: stage I when TAM behaves as an antiestrogen, stage II with development of increased sensitivity to the agonistic (pro-estrogenic) properties of TAM and stage III with an adaptive increase in sensitivity to estradiol (E(2)). During this evolutionary process, as shown in vitro, MAP kinase (MAPK) and aromatase activities increase. The time frame of the increase in MAPK activity as a rule outpaces the increase in aromatase activity during the course of the development of TR. This may occur as a response to estrogen deprivation or interruption of the process of estrogen signaling and can be one of the promoting factors of increased aromatase activation. On the other hand, the chronology of these events indicates that changes in the MAPK cascade can be more important for the early steps of the development and maintenance of the TR state. Changes in local estrogen production/sensitivity to E(2) are perhaps essential for the later steps of this phenomenon. We have explored the use of a growth factor-blocking agent to abrogate the adaptive changes in sensitivity. Farnesylthiosalicylic acid (FTS), an inhibitor of GTP-Ras binding to its membrane acceptor site, reduces the increase in the number of MCF-7 cells induced by long-term TAM treatment. It also decreases MAPK activity in TAM-treated MCF-7 cells and in established TR cell lines. Alone or in combination with letrozole (presumably, through the influence on MAPK pathway) FTS exerts moderate inhibitory effects on aromatase activity in estrogen-deprived or estrogen-exposed MCF-7 cells. Taken together, our observations suggest that FTS is a 'candidate drug' for the treatment of TR. Both the adaptive and genetic types of resistance may be amenable to this approach. Our studies underline the possible importance of starting the treatment/prevention of TR early on. From our clinical studies using immunohistochemistry, there is a rather strong rationale to include as a predisposing factor in the development of TR the increase in MAPK and aromatase activities in human primary breast tumors. In summary, data obtained during the course of this project may be considered as evidence supporting the principle that processes resulting in responses to TAM as an agonist and the development of estrogen hypersensitivity of breast cancer cells could potentially be mechanistically linked.

This article has been cited by other articles:

				T. Li, P. J. Christos, J. A. Sparano, D. L. Hershman, S. Hoschander, K. O'Brien, J. J. Wright, and L. T. Vahdat Phase II trial of the farnesyltransferase inhibitor tipifarnib plus fulvestrant in hormone receptor-positive metastatic breast cancer: New York Cancer Consortium Trial P6205 Ann. Onc., April 1, 2009; 20(4): 642 - 647. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				M. Rokavec, W. Schroth, S. M.C. Amaral, P. Fritz, L. Antoniadou, D. Glavac, W. Simon, M. Schwab, M. Eichelbaum, and H. Brauch A Polymorphism in the TC21 Promoter Associates with an Unfavorable Tamoxifen Treatment Outcome in Breast Cancer Cancer Res., December 1, 2008; 68(23): 9799 - 9808. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				R. J. Pietras Biologic Basis of Sequential and Combination Therapies for Hormone-Responsive Breast Cancer Oncologist, July 1, 2006; 11(7): 704 - 717. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				K-M Rau, H-Y Kang, T-L Cha, S A Miller, and M-C Hung The mechanisms and managements of hormone-therapy resistance in breast and prostate cancers Endocr. Relat. Cancer, September 1, 2005; 12(3): 511 - 532. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				F. Boccardo, A. Rubagotti, M. Puntoni, P. Guglielmini, D. Amoroso, A. Fini, G. Paladini, M. Mesiti, D. Romeo, M. Rinaldini, et al. Switching to Anastrozole Versus Continued Tamoxifen Treatment of Early Breast Cancer: Preliminary Results of the Italian Tamoxifen Anastrozole Trial J. Clin. Oncol., August 1, 2005; 23(22): 5138 - 5147. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				Z.-Y. Zheng, B.-H. Bay, S.-E. Aw, and V. C-L. Lin A Novel Antiestrogenic Mechanism in Progesterone Receptor-transfected Breast Cancer Cells J. Biol. Chem., April 29, 2005; 280(17): 17480 - 17487. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				R I Nicholson, C Staka, F Boyns, I R Hutcheson, and J M W Gee Growth factor-driven mechanisms associated with resistance to estrogen deprivation in breast cancer: new opportunities for therapy Endocr. Relat. Cancer, December 1, 2004; 11(4): 623 - 641. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]